Facebook & NSA feed data to Hillary’s Cartel to manipulate voters and maintain power
(Jun. 23, 2016)—Donald Trump called for a temporary halt to immigration from predominantly Muslim countries. He suggested that America needed to figure out a better system to weed out anti-American ISIS soldiers and sympathizers.
Hillary Clinton, the DNC and Never-Trump Republicans pounced on this suggestion as racial and religious profiling.
Hillary’s Racist False Flag
The lunacy of indiscriminate admission of immigrants aside, the attempt to label Trump as a racist profiler is a false flag.
False flags are used in espionage to paint one’s opponent with one's weaknesses to try and diminish his support and gain advantage.
Hillary uses racial profiling to cajole the Black vote. Her profiling tells her their hot buttons and she punches them. However, she knows African-Americans hate racial profiling. So, she planted a false flag lie that Donald Trump is the racial profiler. While Trump defends himself, she exploits those Blacks whom she has profiled and gets their vote while they think Trump, and not Hillary, is the racist.
In the spy world, if you want to hide your activity, sometimes the best tactic is to plant a false flag by accusing your opponent of what you are doing. This diverts attention from you to your opponent who must then spend resources proving a negative—that they are not doing something. The whole time, you are the one doing it. The same tactic is used by both Democrats and Republicans in national elections. The strategy is: if your candidate has a weakness, attack the opponent on that issue. It tends to even out the playing field in a wall of smoke.
Trump simply voiced common sense: America should not invite people in UNTIL their backgrounds can be vetted to smoke out those who are dedicated to destroying America. It makes no sense to do otherwise, and yet, Hillary used a racial profiling false flag to paint Donald Trump as the racist.
Donald Trump stated the obvious: ISIS hates America and Americans
ISIS soldiers and sympathizers are infiltrating the refugees from Syria, Afghanistan and Libya. Therefore, until we figure out a way to weed them out, the U.S. should stop admitting people from the high risk countries.
For that, Trump was labeled a racist and racial profiler. Why?
Because Hillary wants to hide her massive racial profiling from being found out.
Hillary and her Establishment cronies on both sides of the isle don’t want to get caught, at least until after the election when they are able to seize power, probably permanently.
Hillary Clinton the “Profiler-in-Chief”
On Sep. 26, 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton started paying Facebook for election rigging software. This software used Facebook user data also being given to the NSA and used it to manipulate U.S. election results.
Edward Snowden proved that the NSA collects bulk profiling data (racial and otherwise)
Hillary and Bill Clinton’s donors are the same people who supply the NSA technology to spy on Americans. IBM, The Eclipse Foundation, HSBC, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Barclays, Microsoft, Cisco, Facebook, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Yahoo, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, AOL, Apple, Wind River, Symantec, Xerox, EMC, Oracle, SAP, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Andersen Consulting, PWC, Salesforce.com, etc.
This surveillance program was declared unconstitutional by the 3rd Circuit, but continues nonetheless.
It is human to profile in assessing risk
Profiling is not the issue, indiscriminate, illegal and unfair profiling is.
After 9/11, everyone on the planet looked twice at persons of Middle Eastern origin. Anyone who says otherwise is lying or deceiving themselves. This understandable caution is back due to the ISIS threat.
Donald Trump proposed to stop letting people in indiscriminately until some method to check people’s backgrounds for ISIS sympathies was in place. This kind of profiling is wise, moral and common sense.
This contrast was sharply illustrated after 9/11 when a Black comedian said in a sketch: “The brothers and I used to sit around and complain about racial profiling, but after 9/11, we call it damn fine police work.” Some people just call it smart policing.
Trump detractors pounced
Hillary Clinton and colluding elements of the DNC and RNC, on the other hand, comb through massive piles of Facebook and NSA profiling data to manipulate American elections.
One day they target Blacks, the next day Gays, then next Latinos, then White Women, then Students in general, then African-American Students, then Latino Gays, then Black inner city unemployed, etc.
The contrast could not be starker.
Hillary Clinton’s profiling of people based upon their demographic profiles is indiscriminate and insincere. While it may or may not be illegal, it is certainly immoral.
Theft and misuse of Leader Technologies’ social networking invention enabled exploiting bulk metadata collection for mass profiling—Hillary & Bill drive the bus
Hillary and Bill have participated in the exploitation of the theft of the social networking invention of Columbus innovator Leader Technologies. The invention enabled them to begin collecting metadata on citizens on a mass scale, an ability that had eluded them with IBM, Microsoft and Xerox technologies previously.
They have used the technology to manipulate American elections and line their pockets. See previous posts and Timeline for People you trusted are now hijacking the Internet.
Hillary Clinton is the racist profiler, not Donald Trump
The attempt to label Donald Trump a racist will ultimately fail because it is not factual.
However, facts don’t matter in this election. Sadly, fleeting impressions and “narratives” rule. They don’t have to be true, they just need to finagle unsuspecting voters a few percentage points toward one candidate or another.
Such a view of ones fellow human being as nothing more than a Pavlovian animal to be manipulated is inhuman and as Machiavellian as it gets.
Reverse the Psychology: Read every Clinton false flag as an admission of her personal guilt
Citizens of the former Soviet Union used to joke wryly that they had become experts at reading between the lines. In other words, whatever they read in print, they looked for the truth in the white space between the lines. If the government said something was white, it was black in reality. If the government told you to go right, you should go left.
From now on, readers are encouraged to listen to Hillary and the Establishment with new ears.
- If Hillary accuses Trump of racism, she’s the racist.
- If Hillary says Trump is a bad businessman, he’s a good one. She’s the bad deal maker.
- If Hillary says The Clinton Foundation gives 80% to charity, it gives less than 20%.
- If Hillary praises Mark Zuckerberg as a genius, she’s dishonest and praises thieves.
- If Hillary calls you a friend, you are an enemy.
- If Hillary says she never sent emails marked classified, she sent many and exposed our country’s secrets.
In Hillary’s world of opposites, lies are her truths.
AFI writers support various political candidates. Some support Donald Trump enthusiastically, others do not, at least not yet.
However, they all agree that American political discourse must return a semblance of honesty and fair play. Telling lies all the time is destroying America's social fabric and destroying public trust.
What we see in Hillary Clinton, the current DNC, elements of the RNC and our colluding judiciary has destroyed trust in our leaders and the institutions we have let them run (into the ground).
We The People must throw them out and demand higher standards of ethics and morality in American society.
* * *
Notice: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Photos used are for educational purposes only and were obtained from public sources. No claims whatsoever are made to any photo.
Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to firstname.lastname@example.org and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.