AFI Custom Search

SEARCH by topic, keyword or phrase. Type in Custom Search box
Use this Custom Search toole.g. "IBM Eclipse Foundation" or "racketeering"

Friday, June 24, 2016

HILLARY’S TRUMP IMMIGRATION RANT HIDES HER MASSIVE PROFILING TACTICS

Facebook & NSA feed data to Hillary’s Cartel to manipulate voters and maintain power

Contributing Writers | Opinion | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION  | Jun. 24, 2016, Updated Jun. 25, 2016 | PDF
Hillary Clinton planted the false flag of racial profiling on Donald Trump when, in fact, she is the racial profiler
Fig. 1--Hillary Clinton pounced on Donald Trump’s suggestion to temporarily stop immigration from troubled Muslim countries until America develops a way to identify anti-American ISIS and Al-Qaeda allegiances. Trump’s detractors called the suggestion racist profiling, conjuring up America’s controversies surrounding racial profiling. The illogic of not weeding out people dedicated to destroying America aside, Hillary’s accusations are a false flag to hide her massive racial profiling activity.
Graphic: Wire Photos.

(Jun. 23, 2016)—Donald Trump called for a temporary halt to immigration from predominantly Muslim countries. He suggested that America needed to figure out a better system to weed out anti-American ISIS soldiers and sympathizers.

Hillary Clinton, the DNC and Never-Trump Republicans pounced on this suggestion as racial and religious profiling.

Hillary’s Racist False Flag

The lunacy of indiscriminate admission of immigrants aside, the attempt to label Trump as a racist profiler is a false flag.

False flags are used in espionage to paint one’s opponent with one's weaknesses to try and diminish his support and gain advantage.

Hillary uses racial profiling to cajole the Black vote. Her profiling tells her their hot buttons and she punches them. However, she knows African-Americans hate racial profiling. So, she planted a false flag lie that Donald Trump is the racial profiler. While Trump defends himself, she exploits those Blacks whom she has profiled and gets their vote while they think Trump, and not Hillary, is the racist.

In the spy world, if you want to hide your activity, sometimes the best tactic is to plant a false flag by accusing your opponent of what you are doing. This diverts attention from you to your opponent who must then spend resources proving a negative—that they are not doing something. The whole time, you are the one doing it. The same tactic is used by both Democrats and Republicans in national elections. The strategy is: if your candidate has a weakness, attack the opponent on that issue. It tends to even out the playing field in a wall of smoke.

Trump simply voiced common sense: America should not invite people in UNTIL their backgrounds can be vetted to smoke out those who are dedicated to destroying America. It makes no sense to do otherwise, and yet, Hillary used a racial profiling false flag to paint Donald Trump as the racist.

Donald Trump stated the obvious: ISIS hates America and Americans

ISIS soldiers and sympathizers are infiltrating the refugees from Syria, Afghanistan and Libya. Therefore, until we figure out a way to weed them out, the U.S. should stop admitting people from the high risk countries.

For that, Trump was labeled a racist and racial profiler. Why?

Because Hillary wants to hide her massive racial profiling from being found out.
Hillary and her Establishment cronies on both sides of the isle don’t want to get caught, at least until after the election when they are able to seize power, probably permanently.

Hillary Clinton the “Profiler-in-Chief”

On Sep. 26, 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton started paying Facebook for election rigging software. This software used Facebook user data also being given to the NSA and used it to manipulate U.S. election results.

Edward Snowden proved that the NSA collects bulk profiling data (racial and otherwise)

Hillary and Bill Clinton’s donors are the same people who supply the NSA technology to spy on Americans. IBM, The Eclipse Foundation, HSBC, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Barclays, Microsoft, Cisco, Facebook, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Yahoo, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, AOL, Apple, Wind River, Symantec, Xerox, EMC, Oracle, SAP, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Andersen Consulting, PWC, Salesforce.com, etc.

This surveillance program was declared unconstitutional by the 3rd Circuit, but continues nonetheless.

It is human to profile in assessing risk

Profiling is not the issue, indiscriminate, illegal and unfair profiling is.

After 9/11, everyone on the planet looked twice at persons of Middle Eastern origin. Anyone who says otherwise is lying or deceiving themselves. This understandable caution is back due to the ISIS threat.

Donald Trump proposed to stop letting people in indiscriminately until some method to check people’s backgrounds for ISIS sympathies was in place. This kind of profiling is wise, moral and common sense.

This contrast was sharply illustrated after 9/11 when a Black comedian said in a sketch: “The brothers and I used to sit around and complain about racial profiling, but after 9/11, we call it damn fine police work.” Some people just call it smart policing.

Trump detractors pounced

Hillary Clinton and colluding elements of the DNC and RNC, on the other hand, comb through massive piles of Facebook and NSA profiling data to manipulate American elections.

One day they target Blacks, the next day Gays, then next Latinos, then White Women, then Students in general, then African-American Students, then Latino Gays, then Black inner city unemployed, etc.

Trump proposed profiling to protect Americans from outside forces.

Hillary profiles Americans to benefit outside forces.

The contrast could not be starker.

Hillary Clinton’s profiling of people based upon their demographic profiles is indiscriminate and insincere. While it may or may not be illegal, it is certainly immoral.

Theft and misuse of Leader Technologies’ social networking invention enabled exploiting bulk metadata collection for mass profiling—Hillary & Bill drive the bus

Hillary and Bill have participated in the exploitation of the theft of the social networking invention of Columbus innovator Leader Technologies. The invention enabled them to begin collecting metadata on citizens on a mass scale, an ability that had eluded them with IBM, Microsoft and Xerox technologies previously.

They have used the technology to manipulate American elections and line their pockets. See previous posts and Timeline for People you trusted are now hijacking the Internet.

Hillary Clinton is the racist profiler, not Donald Trump

The attempt to label Donald Trump a racist will ultimately fail because it is not factual.
However, facts don’t matter in this election. Sadly, fleeting impressions and “narratives” rule. They don’t have to be true, they just need to finagle unsuspecting voters a few percentage points toward one candidate or another.

Such a view of ones fellow human being as nothing more than a Pavlovian animal to be manipulated is inhuman and as Machiavellian as it gets.

Reverse the Psychology: Read every Clinton false flag as an admission of her personal guilt

Citizens of the former Soviet Union used to joke wryly that they had become experts at reading between the lines. In other words, whatever they read in print, they looked for the truth in the white space between the lines. If the government said something was white, it was black in reality. If the government told you to go right, you should go left. 

From now on, readers are encouraged to listen to Hillary and the Establishment with new ears.

  • If Hillary accuses Trump of racism, she’s the racist.
  • If Hillary says Trump is a bad businessman, he’s a good one. She’s the bad deal maker.
  • If Hillary says The Clinton Foundation gives 80% to charity, it gives less than 20%.
  • If Hillary praises Mark Zuckerberg as a genius, she’s dishonest and praises thieves.
  • If Hillary calls you a friend, you are an enemy.
  • If Hillary says she never sent emails marked classified, she sent many and exposed our country’s secrets.

In Hillary’s world of opposites, lies are her truths.

AFI writers support various political candidates. Some support Donald Trump enthusiastically, others do not, at least not yet.

However, they all agree that American political discourse must return a semblance of honesty and fair play. Telling lies all the time is destroying America's social fabric and destroying public trust.

What we see in Hillary Clinton, the current DNC, elements of the RNC and our colluding judiciary has destroyed trust in our leaders and the institutions we have let them run (into the ground).

We The People must throw them out and demand higher standards of ethics and morality in American society.

* * *

Notice: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Photos used are for educational purposes only and were obtained from public sources. No claims whatsoever are made to any photo.

Comment

Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to amer4innov@gmail.com and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.

43 comments:

  1. IT IS INCREDIBLE that we the people are putting up with this. Hillary lies so much the endless lies are beginning to appear totally normal. It is unforgivable that she tries to label Trump's excellent, common sense ideas to protect us 'racist', while she continues as Racist-in-Chief. Cannot wait 'til she is lost and gone in November and Trump can begin his campaign to restore this country to its former glory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Email comment by JPM:

    Stephen Braun. (Jun. 24, 2016). Clinton's State Dept. calendar missing scores of entries. Associated Press.

    http://bigstory.ap.org/article/858997d5d9a540688d316654a5bb0c15/clintons-state-dept-calendar-missing-scores-entries

    WASHINGTON (AP) — An Associated Press review of the official calendar Hillary Clinton kept as secretary of state identified at least 75 meetings with longtime political donors, Clinton Foundation contributors and corporate and other outside interests that were not recorded or omitted the names of those she met.

    The fuller details of those meetings were included in files the State Department turned over to the AP after it sued the government in federal court.

    The missing entries raise new questions about how Clinton and her inner circle handled government records documenting her State Department tenure — in this case, why the official chronology of her four-year term does not closely mirror the other, more detailed records of her daily meetings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Email comment by GH:

    Email comment by GH:

    More on LYIN' HILLARY

    Jennifer H. Hickey. (Jun. 24, 2016). With Clinton at helm, State Dept. got 'prestigious' award for record-keeping. Fox News.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/24/with-clinton-at-helm-state-dept-got-prestigious-award-for-record-keeping.html

    At the same time then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was storing emails on a personal server in violation of the rules, her department twice received a "prestigious" award for its record-keeping practices -- an honor that, in retrospect, has watchdogs scratching their heads.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What type of currency will Briton use BITCOIN

    Winklevoss twins: Bitcoin was not formed to rebel against regulation (Video) - New York Business Journal
    The Winklevoss say they heard about the digital currency while holidaying in Ibiza in 2012, BULL SHIT the winkleoss did an article about Bitcoin years before 2012 Mr London put an article on line about Bitcoin and then contacted the winklevoss about the idea and 3 months later the wiklevoss put up an article about Bitcoin and this was way before 2012

    Craig Wright is not f--ing Satoshi Nakamoto. the idea Bitcoin was Mr London idea Craig Wright was the 4 or 5 person who was invited in the idea followed by the Winklevoss followed by Aaron Greenspan and he stole the ideas on how set up Bitcoin saying the idea he developed was his idea BULLSHIT, the Winklevoss say they found the idea Bitcoin but this was a lie, Bitcoin was regested in India by Mr London and was in contact with Satoshi Nakamoto and so named Nakamotobitcoin, the Winklevoss extorted millions from facebook by saying the idea facebook was their idea they had all the IMs and Emails on how Zuckerberg stole the idea facebook YOU GUYS ARE FUCKING FAG HOLES


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Australian businessman Craig Wright, the man who previously claimed to be the inventor of bitcoin, is looking to amass a massive number of patents that is predictably centered around blockchain technology.
      The last time Bitcoin amassed such coverage, an Australian named Craig Wright stepped up and summoned a select handful of publications. He then claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin’s mysterious and pseudonymous inventor. His announcement made mainstream headlines around the world. Excitement soon made way to cynicism and within days, Craig Wright had retreated, apologetically.
      The money men behind Craig Wright had absolved him off of his dues, writing off nearly $15 million in debt that Wright’s companies had racked up. $1.5 million had gone to Wright’s lawyers alone. The reason for backing him? To them, he was Satoshi Nakamoto. The intellectual property belonging Satoshi Nakamoto, they believed, would fetch them upwards of a billion dollars. and as for you O’Hagan you are a suck up little FART
      The hurry for the patents was to help with the giant sale to Google MacGregor [Wright’s Canadian backer] later told me he was speaking to Google and Uber, as well as to a number of Swiss banks. ‘The plan was to package it all up and sell it,’ Matthews told me. ‘The plan was never to operate it.’

      So what do we have here Google is financing Craig Wright and then they BUY BITCOIN??? and say hay look what we just Brought BITCOIN every one
      Craig Wright Mr London wants to have a word with you and he has the records



      Delete
  5. Email comment by Sharyl Attkisson:

    ON BREXIT CENSORSHIP BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA

    Dan Riehl. (Jun. 24, 2016). Sharyl Attkisson: Brexit Support Was ‘Largely Censored from the Mainstream Media’. Breitbart.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/24/sharyl-attkisson-brexit-support-was-largely-censored-from-the-mainstream-media/

    Sharyl Attkisson of Full Measure told Breitbart News Daily SiriusXM host Stephen K. Bannon that “if the media is this shocked” over last night’s Brexit vote, “that means they aren’t really good listeners, or predictors, or measurers of what’s happening on the ground. That’s kind of basically what they’re admitting.”

    Continued Attkisson:

    This is just more evidence of the same trend. Journalists I spoke to said they aren’t allowed to write about this sort of thing. If they write anything that discussed the Brexit, or the exit part of the vote and the sentiment for it, that was, they said, largely censored from the mainstream media. So, maybe it’s no surprise that our media over here was unaware there was so much sentiment on that side. It’s being censored from the news. If you write off the narrative on that topic and others, in that country, just like in this country, they want to drum you out of the mainstream and paint you as controversial. Maybe that’s why people didn’t have the information to understand what was going on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Relative to this post on Hillary's racial profiling, the mainstream media are card-carrying members in the Clinton-IBM-NSA bulk metadata feasting. Exploiting this data, they know what people are really thinking. So, anytime their data tells them a trend is not going their way, this will be thire response--censorship. Censorship of the truth in order to influence enough fence sitters toward their preferred outcome. Brexit proved that The People still have enough power to stop this. On to the American election.

      One difference between Brexit and the 2016 election is the Cartel's insider position vis a vis electronic voting machines. Since these machines use software created by the IBM Eclipse Foundation members and the NSA, they all have backdoors that can used to change the results in key precincts of key states. It has already happened with these machines starting in 2004.

      We need technology whistleblowers to blow the lid off this electronic voting machine manipulation. Guys and girls, sitting in silence about this voting machine fixing is immoral and against every good bone you have left in your bodies. Save your souls and whistleblow so that American can have a fair 2016 ballot box at least. Someone should offer a reward to vote-machine rigging whistleblowers.

      Delete
    2. ARNEBACK: “Had the GOP vote been closer, Trump’s victory would likely have been stolen in the same manner”

      Racketeering Lawsuit Exposes Nationwide Vote Rigging in DNC Primaries Could Derail Clinton

      “Americans do not want to believe that we have people stealing their elections”

      June 13, 2016― The first statistician to show how electronic vote rigging worked in the 2004 Ohio election was an information technologist named Michael Connell, CEO of GovTech. Connell worked for the Bush family and Karl Rove.
      ________________________________________

      “This is not a Republican-Democrat issue, this is not a partisan issue, this is a Democracy issue.”
      ________________________________________

      Connell was deposed in 2004 in King Lincoln Bronzeville v. Blackwell (then Ohio Secretary of State). He testified that he ran the private information technology firm GovTech which created the controversial system that transferred Ohio’s vote count late on election night 2004 to a partisan Republican server site in Chattanooga, Tennessee owned by SmarTech. That is when the vote shift happened, dramatically shifting the count to give Bush the victory.

      Connell died six weeks after his testimony in a suspicious small plane crash. The Blackwell case stalled after that.

      Now it appears that Bernie Sanders was robbed of the Democratic primary in similar fashion.

      http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2016-05-29-Protecting-Our-Elections-by-Ed-Ellsworth-and-Bob-Fitrakis-Cliff-Arnebeck-Lori-Grace-Trust-Vote-Org-Enlightened-Films-May-29-2016.pdf

      See this 7 min. 46 min. summary:
      https://youtu.be/_IAJ5fAm3Cs

      See the full 2 hr. 25 min. seminar:
      https://youtu.be/ofB3QMbPu60


      Delete
    3. Do You Think The Democratic Party Is In Bed With Corporate America? I see Google are trying to get a patent right for voting (vote riging)

      Delete
    4. Dear dave123: Is the Pope Catholic?

      Delete
    5. All attempts to patent apps are fraudulent since Leader Technologies holds the underlying patents on social networking. None of these patents are identifying Leader's inventions in their prior art disclosures to the patent office. Therefore, these applications are fraudulent. In patent legalese its called "inequitable conduct." Pretty sanitized term for cheating and lying by the Clinton IBM Cartel, isn't it?

      Delete
    6. Sharyl Attkisson:
      ALJAZEERA

      Delete
  6. Email comment by Gym Nasium:

    Jessica Conditt. (Jun. 24, 2016). Judge says the FBI can hack your computer without a warrant. Edgadget.

    https://www.engadget.com/2016/06/24/fbi-no-warrant-hack-computer/

    The FBI did not need a warrant to hack a US citizen's computer, according to a ruling handed down on Tuesday by Senior US District Court Judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr. If the decision is upheld, it may have ripple effects that essentially allow government agencies to remotely search and seize information from any computer in the US without a warrant, probable cause or suspicion, the EFF argues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I See Blaming the Chinese for hacking and stealing your info was getting a bit thin

      Delete
  7. Email comment by Boss Hog:

    Todd Beamon. (Jun. 24, 2016). Newt: 'People Are Sick of Their Elites'. Newsmax.

    http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/newt-gingrich-people-sick-elites/2016/06/24/id/735588/

    Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Friday that the Brexit vote proved that "people are sick of their elites" and that does not bode well for Hillary Clinton.

    "They are sick of the corruption and sick of being told they have to obey some weird set of ideologies they don't believe in," Gingrich, who represented Georgia from 1979 to 1999, told Greta Van Susteren on Fox News.

    "This is a very strong signal that the election this fall could literally be the American people versus the Washington bureaucrats," he added. "And I think that bodes very, very badly for Hillary Clinton."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's never too early to dump the Party that has long dumped the People for their Donors LOLOL

      Delete
    2. Sanders has repeatedly stressed since the end of the campaign season that his endorsement of Clinton would depend on her platform and how closely her goals aligned with his own campaign’s. LOL vomit or vote

      Delete
  8. Greenwald nailed it for me.

    Glenn Greenwald. (Jun. 25, 2016). Brexit is Only the Latest Proof of the Insularity and Failure of Western Establishment Institutions. The Intercept.

    https://theintercept.com/2016/06/25/brexit-is-only-the-latest-proof-of-the-insularity-and-failure-of-western-establishment-institutions/

    THE DECISION BY UK VOTERS to leave the EU is such a glaring repudiation of the wisdom and relevance of elite political and media institutions that – for once – their failures have become a prominent part of the storyline.

    ...in particular, “since the 1980s the elites in rich countries have overplayed their hand, taking all the gains for themselves and just covering their ears when anyone else talks, and now they are watching in horror as voters revolt.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “the arrogance of neoliberal elites in constructing a politics designed to sideline and work around democracy while leaving democracy formally intact.”

      Delete
    2. "In sum, the west’s establishment credibility is dying, and their influence is precipitously eroding – all deservedly so. The frenetic pace of online media makes even the most recent events feel distant, like ancient history. That, in turn, makes it easy to lose sight of how many catastrophic and devastating failures western elites have produced in a remarkably short period of time."

      Delete
    3. "In 2008, their economic worldview and unrestrained corruption precipitated a global economic crisis that literally caused, and is still causing, billions of people to suffer – in response, they quickly protected the plutocrats who caused the crisis while leaving the victimized masses to cope with the generational fallout. Even now, western elites continue to proselytize markets and impose free trade and globalization without the slightest concern for the vast inequality and destruction of economic security those policies generate."

      Delete
    4. "In sum, western elites thrive while everyone else loses hope... These are not random, isolated mistakes. They are the by-product of fundamental cultural pathologies within western elite circles – a deep rot."

      Delete
    5. New poll 30% of Belgium won't out of EU

      Delete
  9. Thanks Rain, this is a wonderful find.

    Glenn Greewald is the courageous former Guardian (UK) investigative journalist who first published the Edward Snowden NSA leaks. Thank you to one of our AFI investigators for making a PDF of this Greenwald assessment of Brexit, Trump, the failed Establishment elite and their mainstream media mouthpieces.

    Here's the PDF:

    Glenn Greenwald. (Jun. 25, 2016). Brexit is Only the Latest Proof of the Insularity and Failure of Western Establishment Institutions. The Intercept.

    http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2016-06-25-Brexit-is-Only-the-Latest-Proof-of-the-Insularity-and-Failure-of-Western-Establishment-Institutions-by-Grenn-Greenwald-The-Intercept-Jun-25-2016.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  10. Email comment by Gym:

    Jon Fingas. (Jun. 25). Snowden's email provider confirms it was an investigation target. Engadet.

    It's a poorly kept secret that officials targeted Lavabit's secure email service as part of their investigation into Edward Snowden's leaks. Heck, the US government inadvertently leaked the truth itself. However, a gag order has prevented Lavabit from publicly acknowledging this... until now. In a statement, company founder Ladar Levinson can finally confirm that law enforcement pursued Lavabit in order to access Snowden's communications. When the investigation began, authorities wanted the provider to hand over an encryption key that would not only expose Snowden, but all 410,000 Lavabit customers. It's no wonder that Levinson decided to close shop -- it's hard to advertise private email when the feds can theoretically spy on any of your users.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Darrell Issa is the former longtime chairman of the House Oversight Committee that Obama has stonewalled on Benghazi, Hillary private server, IRS, Associated Press snooping, Fast and Furious, and others. So he has seen the Obama-Clinton corruption train up close and personal.

    Here's what he just said:

    EXCLUSIVE: Darrell Issa: There Is Enough Evidence to Indict Hillary Clinton. Breitbart.

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/25/exclusive-darrell-issa-there-is-enough-evidence-to-indict-hillary-clinton/

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Republican California Rep. Darrell Issa said that there is enough evidence to indict Hillary Clinton for mishandling national security information on her private email server.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alex Swoyer. (Jun. 25, 2016). Darrell Issa: ‘Only the Voters Can Hold Hillary Clinton Accountable,’ ‘More than Enough’ for Indictment. Breitbart.

      http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/25/darrell-issa-only-the-voters-can-hold-hillary-clinton-accountable-more-than-enough-for-indictment/

      “Only the voters can hold Hillary Clinton accountable. This administration will not do it,” Issa charged, adding that “there’s more than enough [evidence] for an indictment.”

      He explained that the statute essentially holds an individual responsible for transmitting what would be perceived as classified material in a non-secured environment. He said Clinton transmitted communications such as working with a Mayor in Afghanistan, adding that if those communications had become available to the wrong people, he could have been killed.

      Delete
    2. Linda Wilson
      Hillary Clinton exposed national security information on her private email server to a public private person exposing phone taping of a country that was about to invade another country and they did i will try and get this Email for you

      Delete
  12. Sounds a lot like what AFI has been saying!!! Jolly good job Oliver!!!

    Oliver Stone Accuses Facebook, Google of ‘Collaborating’ With U.S. Government in Snowden Case

    Filmmaker Oliver Stone railed against the U.S. government, technology giants and the presidential candidates of both parties during a Wednesday press junket in France for his upcoming Edward Snowden biopic.

    by JEROME HUDSON22 Jun 2016, 3:42 PM PDT52

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/06/22/oliver-stone-accuses-facebook-google-collaborating-u-s-government-snowden/

    Filmmaker Oliver Stone railed against the U.S. government, technology giants and the presidential candidates of both parties during a Wednesday press junket in France for his upcoming Edward Snowden biopic.

    During an appearance at Cannes Lions to promote Snowden, Stone reportedly accused technology giants including Facebook, Google and Microsoft of “collaborating” with the U.S. government in the notorious ex-NSA contractor’s case.

    “It’s a form of fascism — the sovereignty of the state versus the sovereignty of the individual,” Stone said, according to AdWeek. “It’s the reverse of the way this country was founded.”

    The 69-year-old three-time Oscar-winner also piled on both political parties’ presumptive presidential nominees, accusing Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton of supporting what he called “the surveillance state.”

    The National Security Agency’s (NSA) secret domestic surveillance program “was not even mentioned in the debates; both candidates are for it—and want more of it, it seems. Nor have they discussed climate control, nor the Earth’s fate, nor the wars and the U.S.’s involvement in them, nor the buildup of our military,” Stone said.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Their are a lot of people who won't out of the EU Obama no one wants to suck on it and yes that dos mater

    ReplyDelete
  14. Email comment by GH:

    Editorial Team. (Jun. 27, 2016). Busted! DNC caught in $100 million voter scheme. The HORN News.

    https://thehornnews.com/exposed-secret-dem-program-linked-dirty-foreign-cash/

    A foreign billionaire and seven-figure donor to the Clinton Foundation has been caught funding a reportedly illegal voting scheme that links straight to the Democratic National Committee and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

    A computer hacker who goes by the moniker Guccifer 2.0 recently leaked emails allegedly from the DNC outlining their 2016 general election strategies — and one of them details a coordinated effort with a foreign entity, funded entirely with $100 million from big-time Clinton donor and Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, to influence the results of the 2016 election.

    The group was allegedly targeting pro-Clinton demographics for voter registration as well as “outreach, organizing, and legal and policy advocacy on voting laws”, and according to Washington Beacon reporter Lachlan Markay, that’s illegal.

    The group behind the $100 million voter registration push, The Wyss Foundation, is registered as a 501(c)(3) charitable foundation. It is forbidden by law from financing direct political projects.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Hatch Act:

      The 1939 Act forbade the intimidation or bribery of voters and restricts political campaign activities by federal employees.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act_of_1939

      Delete
  15. Federal judges have been acting as if they had no regard to the U.S. Constitution they took an oath to uphold, but this is one of the first times I've seen a judge actually admit he loathes the Constitution openly.

    Impeachment is the only way to get these guys out. There needs to be a better way. Otherwise, Congress would be consumed in impeaching the bad boys and girls that are overrunning our federal judiciary.

    HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM:

    Joel B. Pollack. (Jun. 27, 2016). Republican Judge Richard A. Posner: F*** The Constitution. Breitbart.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/27/posner-republican-judge-f-constitution/

    Judge Richard A. Posner, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981 and serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago, has published an op-ed at Slate declaring that the U.S. Constitution is a waste of time.

    Presumably, when Posner took office, he had to take an oath to defend the Constitution:

    I … do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as … under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.

    Liberal jurists are known for their view that the Constitution is a “living document,” i.e. subject to re-interpretation by judges as time and circumstance dictate (and uniformly in a socially liberal, statist direction).

    It took a Republican judge to declare it “dead.”

    ReplyDelete
  16. HILLARY CLINTON'S AID -- HUMA ABEDIN -- WHO COVERED UP THE PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER WAS PROBABLY INTENTIONALLY MOVING CLASSIFIED INFO TO AND FROM HILLARY WHILE HER SAUDI FAMILY HACKERS READ EVERYTHING (and who else?)

    Aiding and abetting hacking is just as bad as doing it.

    Lee Stranahan. (Jun. 28, 2016). On September 11, Huma Abedin Worked For Hillary Clinton and Saudi Charity Suspected of Terror Funding. Breitbart.

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/28/bombshell-911-huma-worked-hillary-saudi-charity-suspected-terror-funding/

    On September 11, 2001 Huma Abedin — Hillary Clinton’s aide for twenty years and co-chair of her current Presidential run — was working for an organization located in the offices of Saudi Arabia’s Muslim World League.

    That’s a Wahhabist Islamic group that Breitbart News recently reported was going to be put on a list of terror funders by U.S. government but was removed, reportedly under pressure from Saudi Arabia.

    This latest revelation ties the Muslim World League directly to the The Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs and the Journal for Muslim Minority Affairs, an organization that Vanity Fair writer William D. Cohan called “the Abedin family business.

    Huma Abedin is scheduled to give a deposition today on her role in the Hillary Clinton email server scandal, which involved classified documents.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Email comment by TEX:

    I was watching "Sponge Bob Square Pants " with my grandson this morning when my IPhone told me that the Benghazi 800 page report was finished and a press conference was about to begin. Although I have not read the report yet, it is apparent that facts are creating angst for Barry and Hillary.

    So I watched the press conference and was shocked to hear the media focus on cost of investigation and political motivation of this committee. " Is it fair to Americans for you to spend millions of dollars on this old news?" Put this in perspective....Barry and Michelle spend more on their vacations than the two year cost of this investigation. They spend millions upon millions of dollars in celebrity parties more than the cost of this investigation. Benghazi was an attack on property owned by the USA and resulted in the death of four loyal Americans. How can cost even be an issue? These reporters should be fired.

    If this is political, GOOD. Hillary is a liar, a coward, power hungry , and totally incompetent . She can not be the leader of the free world. We can only measure leadership qualities by leadership in critical times. Barack/ Hillary failed and folks died. Then they lied , over and over again.

    Please insist that all of your friends and neighbors read this report. It is real important.

    Have a great day, TEX

    ReplyDelete
  18. Email comment by TEX, PART I:

    America's elite including the big network media , unelected judges, unelected bureaucrats, WallStreet crony money boys, and brilliant academia are scratching their collective heads and asking "why is Trump able to create interest from hard working American voters?" They say he isn't prepared to be our leader. After all, he's not a Harvard or Yale lawyer.

    OK, let's see.......(1) Our federal debt is now greater than our national GDP and under Obama our annual GDP growth rate has yet to reach a pitiful 3%. (2) 95 million Americans ( 1/3 of our population ) have physically and mentally disengaged from our productive workforce (3) Those workers that do produce the goods and services that are consumed by the unproductive portion of our population , have huge tax burdens on their income . There are large incentives to LEAVE the workforce. (4) Our businesses have been clobbered with the highest corporate taxes on the planet, forced to fund flawed Obamacare insurance programs, told what to pay entry level employees, chastised for their legal management of their own earned capital, and forced to compete with foreign companies that have none of those burdens. They are not spending their cash hoards on capital expenditures because they are not confident of our future. (5) Our embedded government officials and bureaucrats which number above 22 million, outnumber our manufacturing jobs by 8 million. Since 1989, our manufacturing jobs have declined by 4.5 million, our government jobs have risen over 5 million. During that same period, the world manufacturing jobs have risen by 100's of millions. Our jobs really did go overseas. Our middle class has been decimated . (6) Our political system now enjoys the greatest political division in our history. Our judges write laws , our wimpy Congress does sit ins and protests , our President does what he wants, spends what he wants , and decries the evil that America produces. Our states have no rights anymore. It looks nothing like our Constitution. (7) and finally, a formerly unrecognized enemy has put together a global effort to jihad our collective heads off. They are real, they are voracious killers, and they are gaining momentum. They will be in your neighborhood soon if not destroyed. Our President and his cohorts believe that ISIS, or ISIL, or DASH are insignificant. They use these various acronyms to confuse us. They honestly can not call Radical Islam terrorism by its name. Islam has been at war since it emerged in , what is now , Saudi Arabia in the 7th century. Obama calls it a religion of peace .Islam has NEVER been at peace. Obama has reduced our military and police capabilities. He wants to take away personal weapons. And he encourages unobstructed entry across our borders . How's that gonna work out? Whose side is he really on ?

    ---END, TEX, PART I***

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ***BEGIN, TEX, PART II***

      So now we have a serial liar on one side who is absolutely corrupt as the candidate for " more of the same" versus a businessman on the other side who has fought the battles , overcome the roadblocks , and knows/ speaks the truth as he sees it. He may stretch the truth a bit but so do you and I and everyone else you know. Interestingly, even the GOP elites have their hair on fire with Trump because their little fiefdoms are in jeopardy. This " counter globalism revolution" will be historical. It will be global and it has started.....Brexit. And in the midst of this chaos , America will have a chance to turn the momentum. We will have a slight opening to avoid annihilation as a country. This is why Trump will win. American middle class must have him in this top job. With Trump, the rich will stay rich, the poor will have a chance to improve, and the middle class will grow. What the heck is wrong with that if , in fact, the individual person can get an education in areas that interest him/her and they have access to a way to compete to improve ? That is the American Dream. Here's the bottom line: Hilary loves the notion of power. She wants to be a "first". She literally will kill to get this piece of history. Trump , on the other hand, loves America. He wants to give back, not take. He will go backwards in terms of wealth and living a joyous life. He will serve, she wants to be served.

      AFI is a great blog because it focuses on an honest, dependable , non corrupt America. We have to fire up our patriots.....pass these posts on to your friends and colleagues. The truth must be heard.

      Have a great day, TEX=

      Delete
    2. Thanks TEX. We would appreciate donations and volunteers to be able to expand the corruption investigations. --AFI Writers.

      Delete
  19. Email comment by GH:

    OK folks, we must put these rabid dogs down. (FOR THE PC POLICE: This is a rhetorical metaphor and not be taken literally.)

    Caroline Howe. (Jun. 29, 2016). EXCLUSIVE: Slush funds to pay 'personal consultant' Huma Abedin, a $34,000 a night Caribbean holiday for daughter Chelsea and payoffs to silence Bill's sex accusers - How Hillary has used donations to the Clinton Foundation as her ‘personal piggy bank’. The Daily Mail (UK).

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3659123/Slush-funds-pay-personal-consultant-Huma-Abedin-luxe-Caribbean-holiday-daughter-Chelsea-payoffs-silence-Bill-s-sex-accusers-Hillary-used-donations-Clinton-Foundation-personal-piggy-bank.html

    The Clinton Foundation is 'a vast, criminal conspiracy' and 'a slush fund for grifters' with thousands of honest people who are victims after contributing their hard-earned money to what they believed would be used for philanthropic causes.

    In truth, the money that was donated to help earthquake victims in India and Haiti and HIV/AIDs sufferers in the Third World has mostly enriched the Clintons and their friends through scams spanning the globe, claims author Jerome Corsi in his book, Partners in Crime: The Clintons' Scheme to Monetize the White House for Personal Profit, which will be published in August.

    Driven by insatiable greed while crying they were near-broke, the couple schemed and Hillary used her position as secretary of state to leverage lucrative deals for the Foundation as well as six-figure speaking fees for Bill Clinton.

    The scheme engineered through the Foundation has enriched the Clintons by hundreds of millions of dollars as well as adding $2billion to the Clinton Foundation and raising $1billion for Hillary's second run for the presidency, writes Corsi in his upcoming book.

    ReplyDelete
  20. http://www.realtor.com/news/trends/mark-zuckerberg-built-a-wall-his-neighbors-hate/

    ReplyDelete
  21. https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=hillary+clinton+benghazi&rlz=1T4ADFA_enNZ371NZ371&prmd=ivns&source=univ&tbm=nws&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPw5ni1tDNAhVJ42MKHc7iDgoQqAIIEw YOU GOT READ THIS

    ReplyDelete
  22. Clinton met with the families of the four victims three days after the tragedy. The meeting also involved President Obama and other officials. It is being alleged that Clinton knew she was providing the families with false information about the attack and its causes, which included the provocative low-grade Innocence of Muslims.

    Since the meeting was held behind closed doors, all of the participants have their own version of what was said, but Hillary’s later insistence that she hadn’t blamed the attack on the tape is overwhelmingly in the minority.

    “Hillary Clinton is a liar. Hillary Clinton has been a liar all along, and I don’t care what she wants to move on from – she has never answered the question of why is my son dead. Why was he even there? She says she testified for hours – eight or 11 hours or something… But nobody gave me any answers. I don’t know what this is all about. All I know is my son asked for help many, many times. I underline the many. Nobody helped.”

    ReplyDelete
  23. SOUTH WALES VOTE
    more than 60%chose to leave EU

    ReplyDelete

NOTICE TO COMMENTERS: When the MSM diatribe on "fake news" began, our regular commenters were blocked from posting comments here. Therefore, email your comments to a new secure email addess afi@leader.com and we will post them.