AFI Custom Search

To ensure you are reading the latest post, click the logo above.
SEARCH by topic, keyword or phrase. Type in Custom Search box
Use this Custom Search toole.g. "IBM Eclipse Foundation" or "racketeering"

Monday, March 30, 2015


Hillary Clinton, Lois Lerner, Gibson Dunn LLP and James Chandler make their own law

Contributing Writers | Opinion | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION | Mar. 30, 2015 Updated Apr. 03, 2015 | PDF
Update, Apr. 03, 2015
What Facebook must produce:
Judge Broderick ordered Zuckerberg to give up stonewalled evidence; what's on the list?
Mark E. Zuckerberg
Fig. 1:—Zuckerberg Deleted Harvard Emails in 2010. Mark Zuckerberg was permitted to login to his Harvard email account in Oct. 2010 and delete email. Why did Harvard allow a 2nd-year dropout such extraordinary access, especially since both the Ceglia and Leader Technologies lawsuits were in process? Such destruction of evidence during active lawsuits is a criminal offense, just like it is for Hillary Clinton.
Photo: EliteDail
On Mar. 30, Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered Facebook and Zuckerberg to produce information from 2003-2004 "promptly." See Mar. 31 News Alert below.

On Mar. 27, 2014, Paul Ceglia's counsel, Gil Messina, had asked to review Zuckerberg's "Emails on Harvard Backup" and "Zuckerberg's Computer Hard Drives." The judge's order dialed back Messina's full request, for now, but what has been ordered casts a wide net that should include the detailed items anyway.

Messina's letter says Facebook is attempting to restrict Ceglia's current defense counsel from reviewing the evidence. (Editorial: If Zuckerberg is innocent, then what's the worry?) Zuckerberg's attorney, Gibson Dunn LLP, argues that since they have sued Ceglia's attorneys in New York state court, those attorneys should not be allowed to review the evidence.

In the spy business, Gibson Dunn's conduct is called "lawfare."

In keeping with his forgery story, Zuckerberg has sued all of Ceglia's lawyers for knowingly participating in a scheme to defraud Zuckerberg by putting forward a contract that they knew to be a forgery. However, on Mar. 23, 2015 this forgery story collapsed with the release of the government's own Secret Service forensic tests showed it to be genuine. This new lawsuit against the Ceglia's lawyers appears to be have been designed to try and ice them out form being able to review Zuckerberg's evidence.

Messina's bucket list for Zuckerberg's stonewalled evidence includes:

Zuckerberg's Harvard email—All Harvard stored emails from Mar. 2003 to June. 2004 from his Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences ("FAS") email account. These exist, according to Messina, because "evidence shows that Zuckerberg accessed his Harvard student account in October 2010, after the [Ceglia] complaint had been filed, when he was able to delete emails from his account."

Harvard anti-logo
Zuckerberg was permitted by Harvard to delete email in Oct. 2010 !!!
Curiously Judge Broderick and U.S. Attorney Preetinder Bharara are Harvard Law graduates, and protégés of former Harvard Law professor James P. Chandler. Zuckerberg was at Harvard. Harvard president Lawrence Summers arranged massive news coverage for the 19-year old Zuckerberg in The Harvard Crimson. Facebook largest shareholders from Accel Partners LLP (James W. Breyer, James Swartz, Ping Li) are Harvard graduates. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. is a Harvard graduate. Barack Obama is a Harvard graduate. Sheryl K. Sandberg, chief operating officer of Facebook, is from Harvard. She was mentored by then professor Larry Summers. JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon is from Harvard. Goldman Sachs' Lloyd Blankfein is from Harvard. Former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson is from Harvard. Yada, yada, yada. Harvard has a clear bias toward Facebook in these proceedings. One will probably have to hack this Harvard hubris with a macheti. Will Broderick hold these alums of his alma mater accountable for their misconduct?

Zuckerberg's 28 computer hard drives—Zuckerberg's computer hard drives exist and are in the custody of Zuckerberg's attorney in this case, Gibson Dunn LLP. This is known from the testimony of Zuckerberg's own expert witnesses Rose and McGowen. Zuckerberg and his counsel concealed this evidence in Leader v. Facebook and Ceglia's cases. The Federal Circuit court also ignored this concealment in Leader v. Facebook while also failing to disclose the prior relationships of the judges themselves with Gibson Dunn LLP, who had represented them and now disgraced chief judge Randall R. Rader in 2010 in a conflicts of interest case.

Anit-corruption suggestion box
When will judges fight back against Gibson Dunn LLP-esque justice?
The $64,000 question is: Will Judge Broderick cave to the pressure of this obvious bias against Paul Ceglia hovering over his court? We hope he will stand up for justice and the U.S. Constitution. The modus operandi with Gibson Dunn LLP has been interminable lying, misdirection and delay. They've done it for a decade to hide the truth about Mark Zuckerberg and the truth about Facebook's origins, why should they stop now? Our hunch is: expect more misdiretion. That is what these unscrupulous people believe is real work.
News Alert, Mar. 31, 2015
A first in Facebook lawsuits:
Zuckerberg and Facebook ordered to give up stonewalled evidence; but, does Judge Broderick have the backbone not to cave to Gibson Dunn LLP's lies?
Mark E. Zuckerberg
Fig. 2:—Mark Zuckerberg's opinion of U.S. judges and the law? It's time to pop the kid's bubble. C'mon Judge Broderick, show everyone you've got a backbone. Put him in jail for lying about the Paul Ceglia contract.
Photo: EliteDaily.
On Mar. 30, 2014, Judge Verson S. Broderick ordered Zuckerberg and Facebook to "promptly" produce all information from Jan. 1, 2003 to Jul. 29, 2004 that relates in any way to Zuckerberg and Ceglia. In yet more bend-over-backards protection of Zuckerberg, the court redacted a quote from a Aug. 18, 2003 smoking gun Zuckerberg Email.

(This is Gibson Dunn LLP's worn out modus operandi to seal court records so the truth about Zuckerberg stays hidden behind gag orders, euphamistically named "Protective Orders." )

Court records discussing this email say Zuckerberg and Ceglia were actually discussing the second contract that Zuckerberg claims was a forgery. The Government's own forensic experts now agree with the defense: the contract is genuine.

Put in cyber hijack timeline, Aug. 18, 2003 was two months before Leader Technologies debugged its key invention module for social networking—on Oct. 28, 2003. This was the very same night that Zuckerberg wrote in his online diary: "Let the hacking begin." Ceglia's lawyers also asked for access to Zuckerberg's Harvard Emails, but Broderick deferred that decision as an apparent carrot to get Ceglia to turn himself in. According to Ceglia father, he was threatened and left town with his wife, children and dog on about Mar. 10, 2015 after removing the GPS device strapped to his ankle.

Given the judicial abuses Ceglia has suffered at the hands of the Chandler-Holder-Bharara kangaroo courts, who can blame him for trying to protect himself and his family from this government oppression?

"You can't handle the truth"
(When men write their own rules about the good of others. Chandler justifies his actions for the good of national security, just like Jack Nicholson's character.)

Zuckerberg now has to prove that he isn't lying about the contract. If he is lying (which now the government forensics people say he is), then he committed fraud on the court. That could mean major jail time for him and his accomplices, including his attorney, Gibson Dunn LLP. If so, this attempt by the Obama-Holder-Chandler cartel to intimidate Paul Ceglia with criminal charges will have blown up in their faces. This appears to be the Kevin Bacon scene from A Few Good Men where Bacon's character takes the general, played by Jack Nicholson, into custody for lying to the court.

Montgomery County, Maryland appears to be swimming with world-class intellectual property sharks like James P. Chandler, the U.S. Patent Office, IBM and The Eclipse Foundation. Sharks in sheep's clothing
Fig. 3—Professor JAmes P. Chandler, III The Obama Administration's Legal and Intelligence Puppet master. Chandler is uniquely qualified to have directed the unholy alliance among Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the NSA and the Justice Department during the Obama administration.

Ironically, Chandler is the author of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and the Federal Trade Secrets Act. Chandler was a law professor at Harvard Law. He is a mentor to U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. and David J. Kappos, former IBM chief intellectual property counsel and later director of the U.S. Patent Office. Chandler has also advised U.S. Attorneys like Preetinder Bharara (U.S. v. Ceglia) on trade secrets and economic espionage. Apparently that advice extended beyond how to defend against it . . . all in the name of "national security," of course, including the NSA's exploitation of Facebook customer data and slimy carte blanche user license.


(Mar. 30, 2015)—American law says destruction of evidence during a lawsuit is a criminal offense. However, Hillary Clinton, Lois Lerner and Gibson Dunn LLP (Facebook) have destroyed evidence, and have gotten away with it during Obama’s presidency, so far.

American judges should stay away from these legal professionals who have shown no respect for our justice system.

If Hillary, Lois Lerner & Gibson Dunn LLP get away with destroying evidence, everybody will do it

Hillary just wiped her personal email server clean while she was under investigation by Congress. Likewise, Lerner claimed that her hard drive was “fried” and her emails lost. Gibson Dunn LLP claimed in Leader v Facebook that all of Zuckerberg’s 2003-2004 emails and documents were “lost." They stonewall current attempts in Ceglia v. Zuckerberg and U.S. v. Ceglia for the same discovery.

Magically, Gibson Dunn LLP has now found all of the previously "lost" Zuckerberg computers. However, now they refuse to produce them in Ceglia v. Zuckerberg and U.S. v. Ceglia. They tell Ceglia's attorneys that they'll never get them.

How do they know unless Judge Vernon S. Broderick is in their pocket?

Destroyers of Evidence . . . with impunity?
Mark E. Zuckerberg Lois G. Lerner Hillary R. Clinton Theodore B. Olson, Gibson Dunn LLP
Fig. 4—L/R: Mark E. Zuckerberg, Lois G. Lerner, Hillary R. Clinton, Theodore B. Olson (Gibson Dunn LLP).
Photos: Zuckerberg (EliteDaily), Lerner (C-SPAN), Clinton (NBC News), Theodore Olson (LawDragon).

The puppet master: Professor James P. Chandler, III

What do these attorneys have in common?

It is Professor James P. Chandler, III, whose knowledge of American law is uniquely qualified to circumvent it to benefit himself, his cronies and his private national security agenda.

Chandler and the Clinton's are tight. Chandler was appointed to Bill Clinton’s National Infrastructure Assurance Council (NIAC) on Jan. 18, 2001—just 10 months before Chandler organized The Eclipse Foundation with IBM and Fenwick & West LLP on Nov. 29, 2001. Three months earlier, on Aug. 07, 2001, Chandler had joined the board of Eurotech, Ltd. which was staffed with former commanders and directors of the Department of Energy, NASA and the NSA. Trouble is, neither Chandler nor Fenwick sought a conflict of interest waiver from their client, the true inventor of social networking, Columbus innovator Leader Technologies, Inc., who Chandler and Fenwick were ostensibly "advising" on their legal strategies. See Hijack of the Cyberworld Database and Timeline.

Fenwick & West LLP is now Facebook's chief securities and intellectual property counsel. Imagine that. Can the collusion get any more obvious?

Eclipse’s own meeting notes discuss a “single source” for the original source code that became social networking (a source which they were "unable to locate" just 18 months later - LOL - and were forced to "re-implement" - LOL - lawyer term for steal). In 2000, Chandler had been hired as Leader Technologies' patent counsel. A review of the timeline makes evident Chandler's collaboration with IBM, Fenwick & West LLP, Gibson Dunn LLP and the NSA. Trouble is, they were basing their plans on intellectual property theft. That is illegal and un American.

Gibson Dunn LLP—"One of the most corrupt law firms in America"

This cartel very evidently tapped Gibson Dunn LLP to take custody of the Zuckerberg's 28 hard drives and Harvard emails and conceal them from scrutiny by all comers.

Reporter Julia Davis investigated Gibson Dunn LLP. She credits the firm with the reason why not a single Wall Street banker has gone to jail since 2008. Davis wrote: "Skillful manipulation of the firm’s extensive media connections allows Gibson Dunn to promote their causes, while simultaneously smearing their opponents and silencing embarrassing news coverage."

Only shocking to those who don’t see Chandler’s unseen hand, the judge and U.S. attorney in U.S. v. Ceglia have allowed Gibson Dunn and Zuckerberg to enter the Ceglia case to prevent access to Zuckerberg’s 28 computers and emails from 2003-2004.

American intelligence & Justice directed out of a garage in Potomac, Maryland

The six-year pattern of stonewalling in Washington points to the unique experience of Professor James P. Chandler, III, who, according to Montgomery County, Maryland property records, appears to coordinate America's national intelligence strategy out of his garage in Potomac, Maryland. As a former law professor, his students now run many of our courts. As advisor to the Justice Department on economic espionage, U.S. Attorneys and judges have relied upon him for decades. As advisor to the NSA and C.I.A., he appears to have stepped over the line when he stole his client's social networking invention and colluded with Wall Street to line their collective pockets with Facebook ecosystem stock manipulation. As the saying goes, power corrupts . . .

The epidemic of legal misconduct in Washington appears to have been empowered by Professor James P. Chandler under the secrecy guise of the FISA court, and in the name of national security.

Advice: the ship of this massive collusion is listing badly. Whistleblow while you can.

* * *

Notice: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself.


Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.

Thursday, March 26, 2015


Secret Service forensics prove Zuckerberg lied to the court, Eric Holder acted without probable cause while the Government and judiciary protect NSA / C.I.A. backdoors into Facebook

"Friends of Paul Ceglia" Writers | Opinion | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION | Mar. 26, 2015, Updated Mar. 28, 2015 | PDF


MAR. 20, 2015 Wellsville Daily Reporter article

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Southern District of New York, U.S. v. Ceglia
Fig. 1—Judge Vernon S. Broderick replaced Judge Andrew L. Carter on Jan 8, 2015 in U.S. v. Ceglia, Among other conflicts, Broderick failed to disclose his numerous financial holdings in Facebook interests, including IBM, Morgan Stanley (Facebooks underwriters), The Eclipse Foundation, AllSeen Alliance and NSA. This photo is taken from his appearance on C-SPAN in ACLU v. Clapper (NSA). Photo: C-SPAN.
Ceglia fears for his life in a rigged court; Judge Broderick's Harvard-Gibson Dunn LLP loyalties slip out

(Mar. 24, 2015 Update)—The court just released a 29-page transcript of the March 24, 2015 hearing with Paul Ceglia parents. U.S. Attorney Preetinder Bharara attended but was silent—even when the discussion turned to his former employer, Gibson Dunn LLP. Bharara is evidently conflicted, yet refuses to recuse. Bharara and Broderick clearly have their marching orders from Obama's Facebook Cartel and have no intention of giving Paul Ceglia a fair trial, even after Zuckerberg's claims were proven a lie by the government's own forensic tests (see post below).

My son is “Afraid for his life” and not “going to get a fair shot”

Paul Ceglia’s father stated: “he was just afraid for his life [and] that he wasn’t going to get a fair shot” (Tr. 15: 19-20).

Three times Judge Vernon S. Broderick (Harvard Law) stated his intention to run a fair trial:
BRODERICK: “our job is to make sure things are fair” (Tr. 18: 9-10);
BRODERICK: “we are here to make sure that both the defense and the government get a fair trial” (Tr. 18: 13-14); and
BRODERICK: “It is my job to make sure that this process is fair for your son and fair for the government” (Tr. 16: 22-23).
Broderick’s “we” Freudian slip
However, while discussing the government’s intent to get a judgment against Ceglia’s parent’s property, Broderick’s Freudian bias toward the government slipped out, again:
MRS. CEGLIA said: “You are basically saying you owe us $250,000. We don’t care how you pay us, you owe us $250,000 right now?
BRODERICK responded: “That’s correct, with one caveat, we don’t care how you pay it…” (emphasis added)(Tr. 12: 16-20).
Taken in isolation, this misstatement could be excused. However, given the longstanding bias toward the government in this court, as Ceglia's parents point out, Broderick no longer gets the benefit of the doubt. So much for Broderick pretending impartiality. Wait a minute [head wagging double take]: “WE” don’t care how you pay it? We thought you weren't on either side, judge.

This injustice is off the charts. The proven liar, U.S. Attorney Preetinder "Preet" Bharara, is confiscating the Ceglia's property based on his fraudulent charges and Paul Ceglia's efforts to protect himself and his family from this governmental oppression. Welcome to the old Soviet Union folks (see Original Post below). This is also what the Nazi's did to Jewish homes and businesses on Kristallnacht. (AFI knows this from contributing writers whose families were victims of Kristallnacht - The Night of the Broken Glass, November 9-10,1938. They had their homes and business confiscated to pay fines levied against them on trumped up charges.)


Also glaring in the transcript is the government and court’s double-speak in seeking Ceglia’s parent’s assistance in finding their son:
BRODERICK: “Your assistance in connection with his return would be something that I could take into consideration” (Tr. 5: 3-4).
However, Ceglia’s mother pointed out:
MRS. CEGLIA: “The [U.S.] marshals already told me, if you talk to him, I am an accessory, something or other” (Tr. 22: 9-10).
The parents were essentially brainstorming with Judge Broderick about how they could help without running afoul of the law themselves.

Broderick Waffled

Broderick then waffled, dumping the moral and legal dilemma he had just created into Ceglia’s attorneys' laps, stating: “I can’t give you legal advice about that” (Tr. 23: 10-11). He repeated that four times after asking for the parents' help.

More double-speak

NSA domestic spying tramples on inalienable American rights to privacy and property
Broderick also made contradictory statements about Zuckerberg's attorney's role in the case—Gibson Dunn LLP. He said "They [Gibson Dunn] are not a party to this litigation" (Tr. 16: 13), then said "they [Gibson Dunn] are a party to this" (Tr. 16: 16).

Gibson Dunn LLP is the uber-corrupt law firm that has stonewalled all discovery of Zuckerberg's 28 hard drives and Harvard emails in this and all other cases involving Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg. Gibson Dunn LLP partners, Thomas G. Hungar and Theodore B. Olson, are close to Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.


(1) In asking Ceglia's parents for help in finding their son, Broderick was luring them into a trap where they could be prosecuted for helping (but Mrs. Ceglia saw through that), (2) Broderick disguised his Facebook / NSA / C.I.A. bias in feigned fairness (ask why he was appointed as a newbie Obama judge to the appeals panel hearing complaints about NSA spying on Americans (hint: Chandler stooge to control the findings) - See Fig. 1) , and (3) Bharara was silent. Bharara also attended Harvard and worked for Gibson Dunn LLP, so his conflicts with the judge are legion.

Our American Republic is doomed if we allow lawyers and judges like these—people devoid of moral integrity—to hijack our legal system.

The Soviet KGB-directed courts went through similar motions before incarcerting innocent victims of the Soviet State abuse. George Orwell's 1984 described the double-speak of a society without moral foundation.


Montgomery County, Maryland appears to be swimming with world-class intellectual property sharks like James P. Chandler, the U.S. Patent Office, IBM and The Eclipse Foundation. Sharks in sheep's clothing
Fig. 2—Who Tells the Truth?

The Government's own Forensic Experts Just Proved Zuckerberg and Bharara have lied from Day 1.
Those adept at reading non-verbal body language cues can often determine the intentions of a person—whether or not they are liars—from observing his or her eyes and facial expressions. This one set of photos above is not sufficient to make that assessment in and of itself. However, we noted in our research the strained effort by the mainstream media to make Paul Ceglia appear guilty, whereas Mark Zuckerberg and U.S. Attorney Preetinder "Preet" Bharara needed no help, as a Google image search shows.

Note that the mainstream media are heavily owned by Facebook Cartel mutual funds with a vested interest in protecting their Facebook Cartel investors.
Photos: Ceglia, CNN; Zuckerberg,;
Bharara, NY Daily News. Graphic: Americans For Innovation.

(Mar. 26, 2015)—The old Soviet KGB regularly fabricated charges against innocent citizens, then sent them to prison. The U.S. Government and federal judges are engaged in similar conduct in U.S. v. Paul Ceglia.

When the Soviets wanted to silence a critic, they might have a psychiatrist provide a diagnosis like “philosophical intoxication,” “delusion of reformism,” “poor social adaptation,” “social dangerousness” “dissemination of slander,” “exaggerated religious belief,” “excessive valuation of the West” and “sluggish schizophrenia.” Next, they would plant contraband evidence in the person’s home (favorites were foreign literature and Bibles).  Then, KGB lawyers filed criminal charges as the excuse to incarcerate the dissenter in a mental institution “for rehabilitation.”

This same type of collusion among politicians, law enforcement and the judiciary is occurring in the Government’s persecution of Paul Ceglia. Mr. Ceglia’s current effort to protect himself and his family against this oppression is being met with sarcasm and derision from the Facebook PR machine—just like the Soviets gloated over their staged incarcerations.

See Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union. Wikipedia; See also The Legacy of Psychiatric Abuse in the USSR. Human Rights Watch.

Even though the Government has not proven its case against Paul Ceglia, the mainstream media persists with pejorative descriptions like “scammer” (NY Post), “fraud suspect” (ABC News) and “schemer.”

Mainstream media: Obedient lemmings repeating the narratives of the highest bidders

Nowhere in the current press is Mark Zuckerberg described as the hacker, thief and liar that he has been proven to be. This is yet more proof that given enough money and a salacious “narrative,” the mainstream media will repeat the lies like obedient lemmings. The Facebook Effect by David Kilpatrick and The Social Network movie were primary vehicles in perpetrating the false narratives about Zuckerberg’s activities at Harvard in 2003-2004.

New forensic tests by the U.S. Secret Service prove that Zuckerberg lied and that the Government never had probable cause

Exhibit C, Secret Service Forensic Report, Mar. 11, 2015, US v. Ceglia, Case No. 15-628, Doc. No. 20-2, Mar. 23, 2015
Fig. 3—Exhibit C, United States Secret Service Office of Investigations, Forensic Services Division, US v. Ceglia, reported on March 11, 2015. Off the four criteria tested, two favored Paul Ceglia, two were inconclusive. None favored Zuckerberg's claims. Therefore, U.S. Attorney Preetinder "Preet" Bharara could not have had probable cause to arrest Paul Ceglia two and a half years ago.

Before the Government can bring criminal charges against a citizen, it must have probable cause. In this case, the Government was required to be relatively certain that Zuckerberg’s forgery charges against Paul Ceglia were more likely than not to be true.

Logic says the Government would have performed forensic analysis on the contract before bringing charges two and a half years ago, on October 25, 2012. Instead, the Government pressed this case with no proof at all. In fact, it was not until March 11, 2015 that the Government finally submitted the contract for forensic analysis at the United States Secret Service Office of Investigations, Forensic Services Division, reported on March 11, 2015.

The lab concluded that on two of four criteria (toner and paper), the contract is likely genuine. And, on the other two criteria (age and ink), the lab was unable to give an opinion due to inability to test the materials. Nothing in the Government’s own forensic tests support Zuckerberg’s complaint. Therefore, the Government had no objective criteria to support probable cause.

Zuckerberg’s flip-flop

To put this duplicity in perspective, in November 2011, Zuckerberg told the Government's investigator that Paul Ceglia's contract was a one-page forgery. Then a year later, in August 2012, Zuckerberg flip-flopped by asserting to the Buffalo Judge that Paul Ceglia's contract was a two-page forgery! In a fair court, this fact alone would have caused dismissal.

The Government's U.S. Postal Service and Secret Service Labs have effectively proven Zuckerberg as the liar.

  1. Government based its case solely on the word of Zuckerberg, a Harvard drop out

Taken at face value, the Government based its case solely on Zuckerberg’s unsubstantiated accusations. Since this is highly unlikely given the Harvard Law pedigrees of the Government’s lawyers, other agendas were afoot. After all, in this day and age the words lawyer and “evidence fabrication” are all too often synonymous. The energy being expended by these Harvard Law graduates on a 19-year-old Zuckerberg’s behalf raises eyebrows.

  1. CIA interests bias the Government

Thanks to Edward Snowden, Americans now know that the CIA and NSA have spied on Americans citizens through Facebook since June 6, 2009 using a dubious FISA court judicial opinion. Read AFI. (Jul. 2, 2014). Eric Holder Exploits Secret FISA Laws For Personal Gain. Americans For Innovation; See also AFI. (Jun. 20, 2014). Pattern of US Scandals Points to Shadowy Group. Americans For Innovation.

The CIA, through its private venture capital business In-Q-Tel, invests in “big data” projects with all of Facebook’s principal underwriters, investors and partners.

See Cloudera. (Mar. 18, 2015). CrunchBase. Read: Macaskill, E., Greenwald. (Jun. 07, 2013). NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google, [Facebook] and others. The Guardian; See also Macaskill, E., Dance, G. (Nov. 1, 2013). NSA FILES: Decoded, What the revelations mean for you. The Guardian

The C.I.A.'s investing and business partners include the following Facebook stakeholders: James W. Breyer, Accel Partners LLP, The Eclipse Foundation, IBM, the National Venture Capital Association, Fidelity, Vanguard, T. Rowe Price, Kleiner Perkins, Cloudera, Brookings Institution, Meritech Capital Partners, Gibson Dunn LLP, Orrick Herrington LLP, Fenwick & West LLP, James P. Chandler, the National Intellectual Property Law Institute, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, JPMorgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Credit Suisse, Barclays, Morgan Stanley, Erskine Bowles, Peter Thiel, Reid Hoffman, Sheryl K. Sandberg, James Swartz and Ping Li.

Therefore, the Government itself has a bias in the outcome of U.S. v. Ceglia and cannot offer an impartial court.

Despite this obvious conflict of interest, the Government continues to press the criminal case against Paul Ceglia in an evident effort to protect its private investments in Facebook and its collaborators.

  1. Harvard Law interests bias the Government

Further complicating the C.I.A.’s conflict of interest is the Harvard Law connection among the prosecutors and judges in this case. Both judges, Vernon S. Broderick and Andrew L. Carter, Jr., the U.S. Attorney Preetinder Bharara and Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. are all Harvard Law graduates.

  1. Obama nominees bias the Government

On May 2, 2007, President Obama announced his candidacy for President on Facebook. He relies upon Facebook “Likes” to press his agenda and raise political funds. Obama appointed Judges Carter and Broderick to the court hearing this case. Obama also appointed Eric Holder and Preetinder Bharara. In addition, a notoriously large political donor to Barack Obama is Elon Musk, a prominent Facebook stockholder and beneficiary of $465 million in energy stimulus funds used to start Tesla Motors. The Tesla funds were funneled to Musk via Cooley Godward LLP, Facebook’s attorney in Leader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., 08-cv-862-JJF-LPS (D. Del. 2008) where Facebook was proved to be infringing Leader’s invention on 11 of 11 counts.

These close associations with Barack Obama, Harvard and Facebook hopelessly taint the Ceglia court.

See Petition for Writ of CertiorariLeader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., No. 12-617 (U.S. Supreme Court Nov. 16, 2102).

  1. Facebook cartel financial interests bias the Government

The first judge in US v. Ceglia, Judge Andrew L. Carter, has substantial financial investments in Facebook interests. Despite those conflicts, Carter blocked discovery of Mark Zuckerberg’s 28 hard drives and Harvard emails. He holds up to $1.2 million investments in at least 60 stocks in Facebook interests, including Fidelity and Vanguard, as well as Facebook’s underwriters JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley and BlackRock. Carter specifically holds Fidelity Contrafund (symbol: FCNTX) which is the largest mutual fund holder of Facebook stock with approximately $1 billion invested currently.

See Weiss, M. (Jun. 1, 2011). 'Fidelity's Danoff Bets on Facebook, Bloomberg;  See also Thayer, E. (Dec. 11, 2013). 'Fidelity Contrafund gets big lift from Facebook surge. Reuters; AFI. (Jan. 16, 2015). Obama Attempting to Shoehorn Crony Control of the Internet Disguised as "Net Neutrality." Americans For Innovation.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. also hold Contrafund and have not recused themselves in any matter involving Facebook, even though Roberts did recuse himself in Microsoft v. i4i.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick, also Harvard Law, replaced Carter earlier this year after Carter removed himself inexplicably. Broderick was formerly a partner with Weil Gotshal LLP who became embroiled in Leader v. Facebook judicial scandal at the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Weil Gotshal’s disgraced partner, Edward R. Reines, was caught trading on his friendship with Chief Judge Randall R. Rader to get legal engagements at the Federal Circuit. See Graham, S. (May 23, 2014). Rader Steps Down as Chief, Apologies for Reines Email. The Recorder.

Weil Gotshal had earlier made an appearance in Leader v. Facebook where one of the panel judges, Judge Kimberly A. Moore, failed to disclose her Facebook financial interests as well the fact that Weil Gotshal was her former client.

A close collaborator with Reines at the Federal Circuit is Thomas G. Hungar, Gibson Dunn LLP. Thomas G. Hungar was Facebook’s appeal attorney in Leader v. Facebook who concealed the existence of the 28 Zuckerberg hard drives and Harvard emails to the tribunal. Therefore, there is no arm’s length relationship among Weil Gotshal LLP, Gibson Dunn LLP and Facebook. Broderick’s Weil Gotshal LLP association taints these Facebook proceedings.

The fact is, a certain group of American judges are growing disproportionately rich on the strength of their financial holdings in Facebook interests concealed inside colluding mutual funds. Read: AFI. (Nov. 26, 2014). How Judges Grow Rich On The Backs Of American Inventors. Americans For Innovation.

U.S. Government & Justice Department are running a KGB-style kangaroo court.
The Harvard Law Kangaroos - U.S. v. Paul Ceglia, Profess0r James P. Chandler, U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch, District Court Judge Vernon S. Broderick, District Court Judge Andrew L. Carter, U.S. Attorney Preetinder Bharara, U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Fig. 4—The Harvard law Kangaroo Court in U.S. v. Ceglia. The lawyers circling the wagons to protect Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook have substantial financial and relationship investments in Facebook. In addition, the C.I.A. via its private venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel has been partnered with Facebook's principles ever since Professor James P. Chandler first leaked his client Leader Technologies' social networking invention out to James W. Breyer, Accel Partners LLP, and Leader's other attorney, Fenwick & West LLP. Fenwick & West is Facebook's patent and corporate counsel currently. Barack Obama's 2008 and 2012 elections would not have happened without his reliance on Facebook users for votes. Clearly, Barack Obama and the current U.S. Government are conspiring to protect Facebook, we think. Paul Ceglia cannot receive a fair trial, in our opinion.
Created by The Friends of Paul Ceglia's Constitutional Rights; Graphic source: J.R. O'Dwyer.

Harvard professor James P. Chandler works in the shadows as an organizer of a shadow government, powered by NSA, judicial, Harvard, banking and Silicon Valley crony control of information flow—Paul Ceglia’s claims threaten Chandler’s monstrous agenda

The common denominator among all the Government’s Harvard lawyers and judges appears to be former Harvard Law professor, James P. Chandler. It is notoriously known in Washington D.C. that Chandler advises the White House, C.I.A., NSA, the Justice Department and some members of Congress, like Senator Harry Reid and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi on national security. Chandler also advised IBM and Obama’s eventual Patent Office director, David J. Kappos. He also advised Eric Holder when he was Assistant Attorney General. Chandler was evidently instrumental in IBM’s $40 million “donation” to start The Eclipse Foundation on November 29, 2001. Eclipse widely distributed the platform source code that caused the uncharacteristically meteoric rise of social networking in early 2004.

See (Nov. 29, 2001). Minutes of the Board Meeting, Nov. 29th, 2001. Retrieved from; IBM. (2001). 2001 IBM annual report, Armonk NY, p. 21 (“We donated more than $40 million in application development tools to a new, independent, open-source software community called Eclipse.”). Retrieved from IBM.

Zuckerberg was a pawn tasked to stall Paul Ceglia

Zuckerberg appears to have been a pawn in Chandler’s power play on behalf of IBM, the NSA and the C.I.A. (his clients). Unbeknownst to Paul Ceglia, his desire to build a Facebook at Harvard interfered with the Chandler / IBM grand plan for The Eclipse Foundation. Zuckerberg was likely tasked to stall Ceglia from getting a Facebook started at Harvard before The Eclipse Foundation code was ready by way of the theft of social networking source code from Columbus innovator Leader Technologies―Chandler’s and Fenwick & West LLP’s client.

James P. Chandler, as author of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and the Federal Trade Secrets Act, was uniquely positioned to pursue this aggressive agenda across the legal, technical and political spectra. At the founding of Eclipse, Chandler was a member of President Clinton’s National Infrastructure Assurance Council.

Corrupt lawyers and judges stonewall review of Zuckerberg’s 28 hard drives and Harvard emails, like they do with Benghazi, IRS and Fast & Furious

One thing is certain, a thorough review of Zuckerberg 2003-2004 information will definitively settle the questions about Facebook’s origins—a story that has been stonewalled as badly as the Benghazi, IRS and Fast & Furious scandals. Same law firms, different subjects.

No judge in any lawsuit against Zuckerberg and Facebook has permitted a proper review of Zuckerberg’s information from 2003-2004. This is because we believe the following evidence will emerge:

  1. Ceglia’s contract is genuine. Paul Ceglia and Mark Zuckerberg did sign a valid Facebook contract. Ceglia thought it was to have programming done. Zuckerberg knew his only job was to stall introduction of a Harvard Facebook until his handlers were ready with the Leader Technologies source code. Zuckerberg also stalled the Winklevoss Twins and Aaron Greenspan similarly.

  2. Zuckerberg used The Eclipse Foundation code stolen from Leader Technologies. Mark Zuckerberg misappropriated Leader Technologies’ social networking invention source code, provided through James P. Chandler, David J. Kappos, IBM, Mitch Kappor, Fenwick & West LLP and The Eclipse Foundation to start Facebook on February 4, 2004.

  3. Larry Summers shilled for the 19-year old Zuckerberg at The Harvard Crimson. Lawrence Summers, president of Harvard, arranged for Zuckerberg to get more press coverage from September 2003 to June 2004 in The Harvard Crimson than any world leader or news topic.

  4. Chandler helps orchestrate the NSA surveillance agenda. Professor James P. Chandler, III, helps drive the NSA, IBM and The Eclipse Foundation legal, technical and political agenda in secret and accountable to no one.

  5. Pay Pal Mafia gave the NSA/C.I.A. the keys to the backdoor to our privacy as the quid pro quo. The Pay Pal Mafia bankrolled Zuckerberg to implement the commercial versions of Leader Technologies’ invention while the NSA and C.I.A. built backdoors into the code.

How many large law firms colluding with Facebook does it take to corrupt the American Republic?

The judicial community has permitted Facebook’s gaggle of unscrupulous law firms to stonewall discovery of the truth. For the record, those Facebook attorneys include:

  1. Gibson Dunn LLP
  2. Cooley Godward LLP
  3. Weil Gotshal LLP
  4. Fenwick & West LLP
  5. Orrick Herrington LLP
  6. Perkins Coie LLP
  7. Blank Rome LLP
  8. White & Case LLP
  9. Latham & Watkins LLP
  10. Cravath Swaine LLP
  11. Wily Rein LLP

How many large law firms colluding with Facebook does it take to spoil the American Republic? Apparently, about eleven.

Paul Ceglia is innocent. The Government and Zuckerberg have committed willful fraud on the court.

* * *

Paul Ceglia’s appeals attorneys are:

Joseph M. Alioto
Alioto Law Firm
One Sansome Street, 35th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 434-8900

Robert Ross Fogg
Law Office of Robert Ross Fogg, Esq. LL.M
69 Delaware Avenue
Buffalo, NY 14202
(716) 940-5573

Gil D. Messina
Messina Law Firm, P.C.
961 Holmdel Road
Holmdel, NJ 07733
(732) 332-9300


Note that the author of this press release, Friends of Paul Ceglia’s Constitutional Rights, is a private advocacy group with no affiliation to Paul Ceglia or his legal counsel.  This document may contain opinion that should not be relied upon without independent verification.

Our interest is in ensuring that Mr. Ceglia is afforded his sacred constitutional right to fair and impartial tribunals—something he has been egregiously denied.

We believe that if we do not vigorously defend Paul Ceglia’s constitutional rights now, the abuses will only grow until America becomes a full-fledged plutocracy and ceases to be a Republic.


Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.

Tuesday, March 10, 2015


Whistleblower unearths notes showing law Professor James P. Chandler met secretly with county officials on behalf of himself, Patent Office, IBM and The Eclipse Foundation

Contributing Writers | Opinion | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION | Mar. 10, 2015, Updated Mar. 22 | PDF
Paul Ceglia
Paul D. Ceglia
u.s. secret service logo
Paul Ceglia's contract is genuine, according to Larry F. Stewart, former director of the U.S. Secret Service Forensic Laboratory, and many other forensic experts.
Graphic: FICO.
Update Mar. 22, 2015
Friends of Paul Ceglia issue press release
Click here for "Friends of Paul Ceglia" press release
. The release exposes more C.I.A./NSA ties to the Facebook-U.S. government collusion. (James P. Chandler, see below, advised the C.I.A., NSA, Patent Office (David J. Kappos), Justice Department (Eric H. Holder, Jr.) and the White House simultaneously, according to Washington insiders who wished to remain anonymous.)
Preetinder Bharara, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder
The Harvard Law Amigos. L/R: U.S. Attorney Preetinder Bharara, U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. Three Amigo's in the crimes against Paul Ceglia. All Harvard Law protégés of James P. Chandler. See a pattern?
Photo: The Last Civil Right.
Whistleblower Edward Snowden has already revealed substantial Facebook collaboration with the NSA/CIA in PRISM.) According to the release, Paul Ceglia is the victim of a political hit job to protect Facebook in who all of the judges and U.S. Attorneys have investments and relationship conflicts. We suggest you send this press release to decision influencers you know. The "Court of Public Opinion" may be the only court that can stop the evident corruption in our legal system. After all, these judges collect their paychecks from "We The People." Why are we continuing to pay for this abuse of power? Click here for Wellsville (NY) Daily Reporter coverage.

Click here to read the just published forensic results that support Paul Celgia and prove unequivocally that the Ceglia-Zuckerberg contract is genuine (NOT a forgery, as Eric Holder's minions concocted). One of the forensic experts cited is Larry F. Stewart, former director of the U.S. Secret Service Forensic Laboratory.
Zuckerberg's chickens coming home to roost
On Aug. 30, 2002, Professor James P. Chandler discussed the use of his client Leader Technologies' invention of social networking for the benefit of IBM, the Patent Office and C.I.A. with Montgomery County, Maryland officials. Click here for full whistleblower notes.
Graphic: Chandler Law.
Beware of the C.I.A.'s Cloud–era update (Mar. 15, 2015)
—The newly-leaked Chandler notes refer to the Central Intelligence Agency ("C.I.A.") and a "National Security Academy" sponsored by Chandler's "NIPLI" (National Intellectual Property Law Institute) for which there is "no info. on www." This is consistent with the experience of the AFI university law research librarians who could find nothing on the World Wide Web about Chandler's activities.

Will an Internet Cloud founded upon theft, lies, avarice, deception & lawlessness serve humankind morally & make us safer?
". . . like a foolish man who built his house on sand."
Matthew 7:26.
"Paper presented to C.I.A." Chandler's notes disclose a C.I.A. National Security Academy that he is promoting for which there will be no public accountabilty.

"Chandler has faith in the government." This affirmation of faith from a law professpr emeritus of George Washington University, member of President Clinton's National Informaiton Assurance Council, and author of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and the Federal Trade Secrets Act, would certainly lead a hearer to believe that Professor Chandler will follow the very laws he helped create.

"JPC [James P. Chandler] enjoys his life in Montgomery County." Chandler appears to be making his physical proximity to the proposed IBM/The Eclipse Foundation facilities in Montgomery County as a selling point. This note smacks of nepotism.

C.I.A. and the Facebook Cartel are heavily invested in Cloudera "Big Data" storage. It did not take AFI investigators long to discover deep connections among these Chandler notes, the C.I.A. and the Facebook Cartel. Cloudera's $1.2 billion in investors includes the C.I.A. (In-Q-Tel), Accel Partners, Meritech Capital Partners and T. Rowe Price. These In-Q-Tel investing partners are the largest of Facebook's investors. Accel Partners (James W. Breyer) is Facebook's largest, Meritech was the sixth largest beneficiary of insider trading on Day 3 of the IPO. T. Rowe Price held more than 5% of the Facebook pre-IPO stock. Leader Technologies' other attorney, Fenwick & West LLP, is Facebook's securities and patent attorney. Cloudera's own PR says they are "founded by leading experts on big data from Facebook." These misappropriations of Leader's invention and trade secrets are no longer in doubt.
The 2002 scene of the crime that became Facebook, and the rest of the "social" world
Zuckerberg's chickens coming home to roost
2002 Scene of the "Social" Crimes
Full Timeline
2001 Scene of the Social Networking Technology Crime
Mar. 12, 2015 Update
—Newly leaked evidence from 2002 completes the puzzle of events that laid the foundation for the Phoenix-like rise of "social" technology from the ashes of foundering "open source" initiatives—all based on Leader Technologies' invention.

James E. Freeze, former Leader Technologies Director; Chairman of Pinkerton Government Services; former head of the U.S. Army Security Agency; former Asst. Deputy Dir. of the National Security Agency (NSA); author of 'The Freeze Report' on national laboratory security.
Maj. Gen. James E. Freeze (Army, NSA ret.)
Professor James P. Chandler, former Leader Technologies Director, IP Counsel; President, National Intellectual Property Law Institute; Partner, Chandler Law Firm Chartered; Professor Emeritus George Washington University; adviser to Congress on intellectual property matters including trade secrets, patents, economic espionage.
Prof. James P. Chandler
Starting in late 2001, Leader directors James P. Chandler and James E. Freeze secretly repurposed Leader's innovations and business plans for their Eurotech, Ltd. (aka Eurotech, SpA) colleagues recently retired from NASA, NSA, Navy and Department of Energy. They used a federal research program as their vehicle to gain custody of Leader's source code for IBM / Eclipse, the NSA and Fenwick & West LLP—all in the name of national security, of course. The obscene irony here is that Chandler wrote the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and the Federal Trade Secrets Act. He was circumventing his own laws. He then leveraged his Harvard relationships to press his agenda for politics, law, technology, security and race relations—all hidden from public view and accountable to no one.

This "CRADA" (Cooperative Research and Development Agreement) gave Leader access to Department of Defense cryptographic programs—which Chandler and Freeze repurposed using Leader's homeland security business plans for Battelle Memorial Institute, Etelix and Eurotech, aka, aka Markland Technologies, aka, Technest, aka AccelPath, aka EOIR Technologies, aka The White Oak Group which has over $1 billion in defense contracts currently. All this is in addition to the repurposing by IBM, Xerox, Facebook, Fenwick & West LLP, The Eclipse Foundation and their "open source" devotees. (Read: We like open source software, as long as somebody else spent the money to create it.) Leader spent over $10 million and 145,000 man-hours. That was a pretty good head start for these theives. Chandler described these activities as a "coup" to Maryland development officials in a secret meeting revealed by meeting notes from that Sep. 06, 2002 meeting just leaked by a whistleblower. Read more.


Montgomery County, Maryland appears to be swimming with world-class intellectual property sharks like James P. Chandler, the U.S. Patent Office, IBM and The Eclipse Foundation. Sharks in sheep's clothing
Fig. 1—Montgomery County, Maryland— appears to be swimming with world-class intellectual property sharks like James P. Chandler, the U.S. Patent Office, IBM and The Eclipse Foundation. Sharks in sheep's clothing.
Photo:Montgomery County.
James P. Chandler
James P. Chandler
Photo: NIPLI.

(Mar. 10, 2015)—AFI received stunning new evidence from a whistleblower just as news of Hillary Clinton’s secret email system broke. Notes of secret conversations from Aug. to Nov. 2002 meetings provide more proof of law Professor James P. Chandler’s collusion with the Patent Office, Justice Department, IBM and even Montgomery County, Maryland, to steal Leader Technologies’ invention—his client.


Equally stunning is the level of braggadocio and self-interest exhibited by the professor. For example:

“We do valuable work for our country and it is important for that to be understood and acknowledged”
Chandler claimed that the Patent Office deferred to him for decisions on the “whole intellectual property history [of the United States from] 1790 to present . . . “JPC [Chandler] made tentative decision to begin with the TM [trademark] collection – 42 classes… Patent Classes – many many more.”
AFI. (Feb. 13, 2015). Findings of Fact and Timeline, Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Americans For Innovation.
Fig. 2—Chandler concealed his private representation of the Patent Office. Click here for full whistleblower notes.
AFI. (Feb. 13, 2015). Findings of Fact and Timeline, Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Americans For Innovation.
Fig. 3—Chandler claimed much control over intellectual property policy. Click here for full whistleblower notes.
AFI. (Feb. 13, 2015). Findings of Fact and Timeline, Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Americans For Innovation.
Fig. 4—Chandler demands respect from total strangers. Doug Duncan was the Montgomery County Executive at that time. Click here for full whistleblower notes.
AFI. (Feb. 13, 2015). Findings of Fact and Timeline, Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Americans For Innovation.
Fig. 5—Chandler's scheme to "contract back" prior art search services to the Patent Office. Click here for full whistleblower notes.
“Where US policy is being made on an I.P. [issue] – Chandler generally has a say in it.”
“DO NOT GO PUBLIC with this.”
“Chandler hasn’t been in touch with Senators, Congress, etc. [As an Institute, we cannot lobby, can only educate]… if we get it in place – they want to contract back to do the [patent prior art] searches . . . this is a huge opportunity for the State/County (kind of a ‘coup’ of sorts) . . . the USPO”
AFI. (Feb. 13, 2015). Findings of Fact and Timeline, Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Americans For Innovation.
Fig. 6—Chandler indicates that the uspto gift of patent and trademark inventory since 1790 to cHANDLER is a done (no-bid) deal. Click here for full whistleblower notes.
AFI. (Feb. 13, 2015). Findings of Fact and Timeline, Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Americans For Innovation. IBM 2001 Annual Report announcement of $40 million funding of The Eclipse Foundation
Fig. 7—Chandler solicited Montgomery County, Maryland officials to partner with IBM/Eclipse. Evidence of an illegal solicitation? NIPLI is Chandler's organization, the National Intellectual Property Law Institute. Click here for full whistleblower notes.

These notes provide hard proof of Chandler’s promotion of “IBM Incorporating Members, Business Model – different from current business model . . . consider some approach to partnering with IBM.” According to IBM’s 2001 Annual Report, they funded The Eclipse Foundation with over $40 million on Nov. 29, 2001.

Chandler even promotes IBM and Eclipse involvement to the county from whom he is seeking special favors so that he can establish a facility for the USPTO that they will contract back to him. Chandler admits he is not allowed to lobby as an Institute, but he is clearly doing just that in these meetings.

Chandler dropped the names of numerous influential people, including Bruce Lehman, then current commissioner of the Patent Office, and Doug Duncan, the well-connected Democrat county executive. Chandler alludes to his mastery over Congress and the Courts, stating “NIPLI and Chandler drafted the [Federal Trade Secrets Act]. In that same exchange he alludes to his mastery of the Justice Department as well where his close confidante, Eric H. Holder, was then assistant attorney general and being advised by Chandler on trade secrets, as Chandler says in these notes.

AFI. (Feb. 13, 2015). Findings of Fact and Timeline, Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Americans For Innovation.
Lynn Mattice, former Chief Security Officer, Boston Scientific Corporation
Lynn Mattice, former Chief Security Officer, Boston Scientific Corp.
Photo: ISC West.
Fig. 8—Lynn Mattice, Boston Scientific meetings were arranged for Leader by Chandler. Facebook blindsided Leader just days before trial with fabricated on-sale bar evidence surrounding these Boston Scientific meetings. Judge Stark refused to allow Leader to depose Boston Scientific witnesses or Professor Chandler. Curiously, Chandler's discussion with Montgomery County centered on prior art searching, for which he was angling for the global franchise. Click here for full whistleblower notes.

Exploratory conversation with Boston Scientific figured prominently in Facebook’s 11th hour introduction of dubious on-sale bar evidence in Leader v. Facebook. Those meetings were arranged by Chandler, as these notes confirm. The notes even detail Chandler's travel schedule to Boston. Lynne Mattice was the chief security officer at Boston Scientific and a Chandler colleague in NIPLI.

Leonard P. Stark
Leonard P. Stark
Photo: US Courts.

Hindsight shows that Facebook was evidently coached by Chandler on how to most effectively blindside Leader with prior art arguments at trial in order to give crony Judge Stark the excuse he needed to support the bogus on-sale bar verdict.

Judge Leonard P. Stark blocked Leader from being able to interview Boston Scientific witnesses once the Boston Scientific evidence emerged on the eve of trial.

AFI. (Feb. 13, 2015). Findings of Fact and Timeline, Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Americans For Innovation.
Fig. 9—Chandler's travel schedule to Boston for the Leader Meeting he arranged with Lynn Mattice, which became the focus of Facebook's last minute on-sale bar blindside at trial. "(614) 890-3141" is a Leader Technologies number. Click here for full whistleblower notes.
Mitch Kappor, founder of Lotus Corp; founder of Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF); likely a James P. Chandler ''ombudsman'' to funnel Leader Technologies' source code to IBM and The Eclipse Foundation
Mitch Kappor.
Findings Timeline, No. 33..
Photo: Foundersatwork.

Tellingly, Chandler mentioned the name of former Patent Office commissioner, Bruce Lehman. Lehman disclosed in his Senate testimony that Lotus Corporation and Adobe Systems are his former clients. Lotus’ founder, Mitch Kappor, started “Project Chandler(see No. 33)” on Oct. 21, 2002 ostensibly to disseminate open source software (Leader Technologies’ invention). Kappor appears to have become one of the "ombudsmen" Chandler sought in these conversations.

Even more telling, according to The Eclipse Foundations own meeting minutes, they released version 1.0 of the Eclipse “open source” software on Mar. 06, 2002—the same moment that Leader Technologies placed its source code in Professor Chandler’s and Fenwick & West LLP’s custody, ostensibly as a part of their Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) project escrow. See Findings of Fact and Timeline.

George Will said Sunday of the Clintons that they "could find a loophole in a stop sign." The individuals just exposed by this whistleblower will start digging for their loopholes, but they're going to need some pretty deep holes. Rarely do such insider notes as this surface, so the opportunities to corroborate this evidence are many.

Readers should know that AFI has engaged the services of experienced law librarians from a major university who were quite frustrated by the lack of evidence about all these Chandler activities, which were clearly many, and all done in secret. Their conclusion was that the web itself was intentionally cleansed of information about him and his many associations, just like it has been for John P. Breyer, the father of Accel Partners LLP's James P. Breyer, Fenwick & West LLP's client in 2002 when the theft of Leader Technologies' code occurred.

It appears that we finally have a date for the theft of Leader's invention—Mar. 6, 2002.

IBM 2001 Annual Report announcement of $40 million to fund The Eclipse Foundation

According to IBM’s 2001 Annual Report, they funded The Eclipse Foundation with over $40 million on Nov. 29, 2001. IBM's chief inside intellectual property counsel was David J. Kappos. James P. Chandler, III, was IBM's chief outside intellectual property counsel. Mitch Kappor had cashed out Lotus via IBM and maintained strong ties. Kappos was appointed director of the U.S. Patent Office in an unusual recess appointment by President Barack Obama on Aug. 07, 2009—without Congressional approval. Graphic: IBM 2001 Annual Report.

* * *


Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.