Appeals court affirms Zuckerberg's debunked forgery story despite Secret Service Forensic authentication
(Apr. 20, 2015)—No wonder Paul Ceglia left town with his family. The American justice system is out to put him away because, we believe, his claims upset a long-planned hijack of American digital infrastructure by Facebook’s handlers via the NSA, IBM and The Eclipse Foundation. In the process, judges are being handsomely compensated by Wall Street for going along.
The Facebook financial conflicts-laden Second Circuit in Paul Ceglia’s appeal (see previous post for analysis of their financial disclosures, also here: Cabraras | Raggi | Calabresi) took only one day to issue its opinion. The hearing occurred in Manhattan only on Thursday.
This Made-for-TV opinion is replete with narcissistic references to Facebook’s "Academy Award-winning movie."
Remarkably, an allegedly-esteemed U.S. appeals court is taking its cue about the facts and the law from Hollywood. The National Enquirer would be proud.
U.S. Secret Service Forensics: The Ceglia-Zuckerberg contract is authentic
The “Summary Order” ignored the elephant in the room. The recent U.S. Secret Service Forensics report concluded that the CONTRACT IS VALID and NOT A FORGERY as claimed by Zuckerberg.
Despite this hard evidence, the Second Circuit continued to support the BIG ZUCKERBERG LIE—that the lower court got it right by so-called “clear and convincing evidence” that the contract was a forgery.
Abortion of due process
The lower court judge made that decision without a jury trial, and with a magistrate judge, Leslie G. Foschio, who issued a 155-page report using only Facebook’s forensic hired-liar experts whom he shielded from cross-examination by Ceglia’s experts. Ceglia was also blocked from discovery of Zuckerberg’s 28 hard drives and Harvard emails.
Ceglia’s appeal focused on these clear abuses of due process—which the Second Circuit IGNORED.
This is one of the most pathetic abuses of federal power in recent memory. Like lemmings, these appeals court judges spout the Zuckerberg fiction while ignoring affirmed facts by the government’s own experts.
Ceglia says he is telling the truth. The Secret Service affirms that he is telling the truth. And yet, these judges ignore the evidence and say he is guilty.
The gross decline of Yale & Harvard Law integrity
These judges (Calabresi, Cabranes and Raggi) hail from Yale and Harvard Law. The quality of their legal and moral education is very evidently suspect.
Welcome to the kangaroo courts of the old Soviet Union folks. We've arrived. This opinion proves this thesis with empirical evidence.
Click here to read the Second Circuit opinion. Summary Order, Doc. No. 158-1, Ceglia v. Zuckerberg; Holder et al, 14-1365-cv; 14-1752-cv (2nd Cir. 2014).
* * *
Notice: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself.
Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to firstname.lastname@example.org and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.