AFI Custom Search

To ensure you are reading the latest post, click the logo above.
SEARCH by topic, keyword or phrase. Type in Custom Search box
Use this Custom Search toole.g. "IBM Eclipse Foundation" or "racketeering"

Tuesday, October 22, 2013


Obamacare confusion, IRS, AP, JPMorgan, Leader v. Facebook—All part of a grand scheme?

Contributing Writers | OPINION | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION  | Oct. 22, 2013
Barack Obama and Jamie Dimon have a cozy relationship
Fig. 1—Cozy is the only way to describe the longstanding relationship between Barack Obama and JP MorganChase's CEO, Jamie Dimon. Obama's Wall Street handlers appear to be Jamie Dimon, Lawrence "Larry" Summers, and Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs—all of whom Obama and Summers bailed out in 2008 to the tune of $30+ billion, not counting the Facebook IPO misrepresentation in collaboration with the SEC, and the "green" energy stimulus to cronies. Photo: Reuters.

(October 22, 2013)—The Obama Facebook Club orchestration of crisis on top of crisis continues. Layered on top of the Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption and the fraudulent use of Leader Technologies’ social networking invention, we now add Obama's/Eric Holder’s dubious settlement with Jamie Dimon, and the Obamacare website crisis.

Like Obama's confiscation of Leader Technologies' invention, Obama is now allowing JP MorganChase to turn over $13 billion to his government—property of the bank's shareholders, not Jamie Dimon's or Obama's. In short, this government is further shredding constitutional private property rights, just like the Federal Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court had no right to confiscate Leader's patent property rights by judicial fiat.

"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste," Rahm Emanuel, Mr. Obama's new chief of staff, told a Wall Street Journal conference.[01]

Barack Obama and the Facebook Club further muddy the waters with each new scandal
Fig. 2—Each new Obama scandal further muddies the waters. Photo: Lake

Why are these new crises good for the Obama Facebook Club Agenda? They muddy the waters further.

  1. Bailout Scam. They obscure Jamie Dimon’s intertwined associations with Goldman Sachs’ and Morgan Stanley’s $30 billion from U.S. taxpayers in the 2008 bailout—funds with significant portions sent to dubious foreign partner banks, including Russian banks associated with Russian oligarchs and Goldman Sachs-Moscow;
  2. Green Energy Stimulus Scam. They obscure the ongoing investigation into the funneling of "green" stimulus funds to Obama donors, including the families of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority leader Harry Reid—funds managed by JPMorganChase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Facebook law firm Cooley Godward LLP;
  3. Judicial Corruption. They take Congress’s attention away from the massive judicial corruption at the Federal Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court exposed by Leader v. Facebook.
  4. Property Confiscation. They delay redress of the confiscation of Leader Technologies’ patent properties by the Obama administration (47 million Obama Facebook “likes,” Patent Office’s 16,000 “likes,” etc.), not to mention Facebook’s illegal use of Leader’s property to drive the Facebook engine;
  5. Voter Manipulation. The delay enables Obama and Facebook to continue manipulating the LOFO voter (low-information voter) data and fund raising from Facebook that will be critical for the 2014 and 2016 elections;
  6. Corrupt Law Firms. They obscure the culpability of Washington DC and Silicon Valley law firms directly associated with these layers of corruption, including Gibson Dunn, Fenwick & West, Cooley Godward, Weil Gotshal, White & Case, Latham & Watkins, Blank Rome, Perkins Coii, Orrick Herrington, Federal Circuit Bar Assoc., DC Bar Assoc.
  7. Masters of Misdirection:
    Beware the hacker offering "help" to the Obamacare website; Facebook's NASDAQ website was broken too. All the Facebook Club insiders cashed out during that confusion.
    Securities Fraud. The delay obscures the massive Facebook IPO securities fraud perpetrated by JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and the SEC;
  8. Money Laundering. The delay obscures investigation of the Facebook Club ties among the IPO, 2008 bail out and energy stimulus.
  9. Obamacare Backdoors. The delay enables Obamacare to solicit website “help” from Facebook crony hackers to build privacy-violating backdoors “to enhance user experience.”

Real leadership creates peace, not confusion

Merriam Webster defines confusion as “a state or situation in which many things are happening in a way that is not controlled or orderly.” Contrast the confusion and injustice emanating from Washington DC with the words of St. Paul in I Corinthians 14:33: “God is not the author of confusion, but of peace.” Confusion is equated with madness and blindness in Deuteronomy 28: 20: “The Lord will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind.” From time immemorial, confusion has been associated with lack of humanity, injustice and unrighteousness. "You shall know them by their fruit." A bad tree cannot produce good fruit.

Is it just us, or does the Obama Administration appear to be orchestrating these crises? Are they stealing properties and information as tools to radically alter American democracy? It is readily apparent that they rely heavily on the global communication system invented by Leader Technologies. It appears their strategy also includes control of healthcare and electioneering data, as well as financial and banking data. It appears that The People must stop this since Washington is already caught in this web of confusion.

Is American confusion actually a well-conceived Facebook Club plan?
Fig. 3—Is the confusion actually a well-conceived plan to unravel American Democracy in the name of "hope and change." Graphic: After Class Lounge.

Engineering 101: Define the confusion problem correctly

The first step in solving a problem is to define it correctly. It behooves our uncompromised American leadership to consider that these layers of crises emanate from a single strategy for political, financial, legal and technological control by the Facebook Club.

Pulling on the many threads of Jamie Dimon’s fabric of associations seems to lead to the same spool of Facebook Club thread. Congress should stop chasing each of these crises separately, and instead, dig into the unifying motive.

* * *


[01] “In Crisis, Opportunity for Obama.” The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 21, 2008 <>; See also <>.


  1. In a letter to Thomas Jefferson, John Adams advised: "No effort in favor of virtue is lost."

    This site is a clear example of virtuous efforts. Adams would be proud of these truly patriotic people.

  2. NSA program appears to be much more far-reaching than the FRA surveillance scheme that has been ongoing since 2008. NSA targeted prominent business and politics, When certain TELEPHONE numbers are used this ACTIVATES a signal that triggers the recording of CONVERSATIONS. The system also picks up TEXT messages and their content. And a lot of this info ended up on Obama desk President Obama is directly in total control of Digital data and Innovation IDEAS that are stolen, You must explain your actions OBAMA, This just puts UNPRECEDENTED POWER into the hands of the unscrupulous like facebook, but you know this Obama (blackmail, coercion, sabotage, manipulation, business interference, robbery,

    its irresponsible of facebook to post beheading videos without warning We need to stand up, speak up, and work together to end the corruption exposed by Americans for Innovation. U.S. intelligence spying on its own citizens, and the world

  3. The supposed "shakedown" of JPMorganChase is suspicious. CEO Jamie Dimon is an OBAMA HANDLER -- ONE OF THE PUPPET MASTERS. One doubts that the tail is wagging the dog here. Some of my contacts are suggesting that Obama is only pretending to fleece JPMorganChase in order to raise funds to promote his failing Obamacare rollout. Some suggest that the $13 billion being extracted from JPMorganChase's shareholders will be used for political purposes. If so, this amounts to property confiscation of JPM's shareholders' value by the administration, just like Obama is currently promoting his agenda today to his 47 million Facebook "likes" using Leader Technologies' confiscated invention called Facebook.

    Here's Obama's video post today to his 47 million Facebook likers:

    "They're paying a huge fine to a cash-hungry treasury. They're also giving the president money to spread around for political purposes. Four billion [dollars] for consumers who were hurt by basically fraudulent mortgages.

    Peter Morici: Justice Department is 'Shaking Down' JPMorgan

    1. The following DC and Silicon Valley law firms and pseudo-laywers appear to be leading the drive to dismantle American democratic processes. Whenever problems become intractable, like we are seeing in Washington, that's because hidden agendas are at play. These law firms have a bevy of "specialists" in constitutional law, ethics, securities and intellectual property. What better group to use their knowledge of the weaknesses of our democratic institutions to take over, what with George Soros now in play with John P. Breyer (Facebook's James W. Breyer's father and head of Accel-IDG Capital Partners-China) in this global chess match?

      Hey American citizens. How do you like being the chess pieces of corrupt lawyers and financiers?

      1. Gibson Dunn LLP
      2. Fenwick & West LLP
      3. Cooley Godward LLP
      4. Weil Gotshal LLP
      5. White & Case LLP
      6. Latham & Watkins LLP
      7. Blank Rome LLP
      8. Perkins Coii LLP
      9. Orrick Herrington LLP
      10. Sullivan Cromwell LLP
      11. Federal Circuit Bar Association
      12. DC Bar Association
      13. US Patent Office (nothing but layers)
      14. US Justice Dept (nothing but lawyers)
      15. US Securities & Exchange Dept.(nothing but lawyers)
      16. Chief Justice John G. Roberts
      17. McBee Strategic LLC (pseudo lawyers)
      18. Accel Partners LLP/James W. Breyer (pseudo lawyers)
      19. Accel-IDG Partners China LLP/John P. Breyer (pseudo lawyers)
      20. Goldman Sachs (psuedo lawyers)
      21. Morgan Stanley (psuedo lawyers)
      22. US Executive Branch (nothing but lawyers)
      23. George Soros (surrounded by lawyers)

      The cast of characters for this lawfare tragedy appears set.

  4. Let's see if we can make sense of this.


    Leader spends approximately 3-4 years and $10 million dollars to develop what we now know, proven in court, is the core software of Facebook.


    Mark Zuckerberg claims that he wrote all the code for the core of Facebook in 2 weeks... while also studying for finals at Harvard. What was his budget for development? Several thousand dollars. Remember, he did not get connected to the Accel Partners until after the launch of Facebook!


    Now we have the US Government and the Affordable Healthcare Act "Obamacare" saying it took them 3 1/2 years and over $500 MILLION and 4 separate contractors, and they still don't have it working right!


    Why hasn't the press investigated Zuckerberg's "one to two weeks" nonsense in the Leader v. Facebook trial? Could it be because of the Facebook Cabal's connections with the Federal government, courts, judges, etc.? Is the Pope Catholic?


    One only has to think to see the massive corruption.

  5. This is really not accurate. Leader sued for patent infringement, not copyright infringement. Patent infringement deals with the method that something is done. The only thing that was shown at trial is that Facebook ended up implementing some minor features the same way that the Leader patent described. But there was never any showing or argument that the code was actually the same. That is the key difference between a patent and copyright. There was certainly no showing that anything was ever stolen. If the code was the same, Leader would have brought a copyright suit.

    I was a student at Harvard when the original Facebook rolled out. It was very, very primitive and was all coded in PHP. it very easily could have been written in a week or so. It had no functionality beyond any existing platforms like MySpace. But I remember that there was a huge buzz because it was Harvard exclusive. I remember that is really what got people excited from the start.

    1. Jill (aka Facebook attorney and spin doctor):

      Your information is totally off base. Facebook was judged guilty of literal infringement on all 11 counts. That's the highest form of patent infringement. Your "minor features" happen to be the entire Facebook site. Further, your legal understanding of willful infringement, be it patent or copyright, is woefully inadequate.

      Your waxing eloquent about PHP code is laughable. You Facebook attorneys are showing your knowledge that is a mile wide and an inch deep. We suggest you find another line of work.

    2. There were FOUR "facebooks" floating at Harvard in late 2003, early 2004. Harvards', Winklevoss', Greenberg's and Zuckerberg's using Leader Technologies' platform. Curiously, the only one that received Harvard Crimson publicity was Zuckerberg's. Coincicentally, Larry Summers just happened to be the Harvard President then and has benefited financially (Goldman Sachs, Digital Sky, Instagram, Sherly Sandberg, Yuri Milner, etc. etc.). Do ya think Jill's Harvard "buzz" was an inside job? Sure was since she (the Facebook lawyers) were doing all the buzzing, being directed by the "PayPal Mafia" and the Harvard uber-alums James W. Breyer, Ping Li and James Swartz along with Reid Hoffman.

      These people were buzzing their little bee wings off they were so excited at their luck of discovering Leader Technologies' invention.

  6. Investigating this further, something seems very wrong. The Donnakline site is now promoting some plumbing company? After doing additional research, it appears that Donna is not actually a journalist. She provides journalism for payment. "She recently launched DLK Industries, which is a firm designed increase clients’ Internet visibility through press releases, improvements in both internal and external communication and video production. ".

    Why was this conflict of interest not disclosed by Leader?

    All of the sudden, her site has now modified itself so that sites like can no longer access it. She is apparently trying to hide all of her previous Facebook posts. This is very disturbing. What prompted this attempt to hide the past?

    1. LOL. You Facebook-lover lawyers are fixated on Donna Kline. All of Ms. Kline sites are accessible in PDF form at

      The fact that Ms. Kline decided to stop chasing you Facebook lawyers around your May Pole shows she needed to get on with her life and career. Her professional bio speaks for itself, and her current activities are her choice. You're just jealous that she stopped paying attention to you. Who can blame her for getting disgusted with the moral profligacy exhibited by the Facebook Club?

  7. ROTFL!!!!!"

    Jill, your "in depth" investigating is amazing! I hope the "buzz" that was at Harvard at the time Facebook started wasn't the one that prompted your comment! It is a well known secret that "journalist" are not supposed to make any money. You have just revealed their secret! Also, as has been pointed out many times, it seems that any defense of Zuckerberg comes by misdirection. No addressing the issues, no substance!

    You are making the Lofo voters look brilliant with these comments!

    Thanks for the humor.


  8. How in the world would you consider that to be misdirection? My comment was very simple. The original Facebook site was very primitive and easily could have been programmed in a week. Leader always claims that it would've taken years and millions of dollars. That is just false. A simple site like the original Facebook could easily be programmed in a matter of days by single programmer.

    A journalist who is being paid by a company to write articles has a duty to disclose that. There was never any mention that Leader was paying for coverage, and now it appears that she is attempting to scrub any record of her articles from the Internet.

    1. Now Ms. Kline has control of This is a laughable assertion. If didn't archive Donna's blogs, that is their shortcoming. If one wants to investigate paid "journalists," one should ask David Kirkpatrick if he has been paid for his spin-doctoring for Facebook since 2004.This misdirection regarding Donna Kline is silly fabrication.

      Heads up Readers: The Facebook Club seems to be having a hard time justifying Zuckerberg's claim to have built the entire Facebook website in "one to two weeks" while studying for finals in Jan. 2004. Here's Zuckerberg's testimony. Now they're trying to get people to believe the first Facebook site was "primitive." In Zuckerberg's testimony he even alludes to "other" sources. Everything about this kid is evasive. Such is the way with pathological liars.

      Zuckerberg is truly magical to hear his lawyers tell the story. After all, they're the only ones who love him. Now the spin is that his first code was "primitive." This is priceless tripe to throw at the LOFO (low-information) Facebook users who don't understand the intricacies of programming anyway. Just throw around a few acronyms like PHP and you throw them off the trail. Don't be fooled LOFOs, no programmer could have built such a site in "one to two weeks" while drinking, chasing girls and studying for finals. Its a total fabrication that these people have gotten the world to swallow hook, line, and sinker since 2004.

    2. Also, if Facebook was really "primitive PHP" then why did they conceal it and say Zuckerberg's documents and hard drives were all "lost" when Leader's lawyers asked for all the files and documents? Only in 2012 did the world learn in the Ceglia v. Zuckerberg case that those hard drives were always in the possession of Facebook's appeals attorney Gibson Dunn LLP.

      Facebook's lawyers flat out lied in Leader v. Facebook about the whereabouts and existence of the 28 Zuckerberg hard drives and Harvard emails. If the code really was as primitive as Jill says, then (a) how does Jillie known this, and (b) Zuckerberg should produce the code to prove it really was "primitive."

      Deposition of Michael F McGowan, Facebook Forensic Expert, Paul D. Ceglia v. Mark E. Zuckerberg, 1:10-cv-00569-RJA (W.D.N.Y. 2010), Jul. 19, 2012.

      Deposition of Bryan J. Rose, Facebook Forensic Expert, Paul D. Ceglia v. Mark E. Zuckerberg, 1:10-cv-00569-RJA (W.D.N.Y. 2010), Jul. 18, 2012.

  9. There has never been a shred of evidence that Facebook actually stole any code. Leader had access to all of the code in its lawsuit, so if there were actual evidence of copying you would have seen it in the trial.

    And Donna modified the robots text file on her site to prevent from accessing it. She apparently wants to erase the signature of her leader press coverage

    1. Wow "Jill." Which Facebook law firm do you work for? Your knowledge of the trial is more SPIN to fool the unsuspecting. You've been proven to be liars and now you're feeling the need to create more lies to fix the other lies. We're not going to help you any further with evidence since you seem to have a selective memory. Let's see, now suddenly you have intimate knowledge of We already gave you a link to ALL of Donna's posts, so what's your point? She passed the torch to this site and all the posts are available in full in PDF form. So much for trying to "erase" the press coverage! LOL.

  10. This blog simply does not understand the difference between patent infringement and copyright infringement. They are two very different things. Here, leader sued for patent infringement during the course of the case, leader had access to Facebook's code.

    If Facebook had actually stolen any code, i.e. copied Leader's code, then leader would have brought a copyright claim.

    At a minimum, leader would have amended its complaint to include a claim for copyright infringement. Or, leader would have filed a separate lawsuit for copyright infringement. Non-of this was ever done.clude a claim for copyright infringement. Or, leader would have filed a separate lawsuit for copyright infringement. None of this was ever done, which makes clear that leader knew it didn't actually have a copyright suit. This blog can make all of the wild accusations it wants, but when the company that actually owns the code decides that there is no claim, that speaks volumes.

    1. There you go again, trying to change the subject. Facebook was found guilty on 11 of 11 counts of PATENT INFRINGEMENT. Willful infringement means you knew you were infringing. Who mentioned copyright? In any event, if you copied the code in a patent infringement case, or a copyright infringement case, you still copied the code. You are making a distinction without a difference.

      Facebook attorneys CONCEALED Zuckerberg's 28 hard drives and Harvard emails from the Leader v. Facebook discovery - by the testimony of your own experts in 2012! LOL. Whoops. If there was nothing to hide, then why did you hide it? Double Whoops. And, if you are so confident that Zuckerberg is innocent, produce those 28 hard drives and Harvard emails to the court. Of course, we know he isn't and you won't until you are facing jail time.


NOTICE TO COMMENTERS: When the MSM diatribe on "fake news" began, our regular commenters were blocked from posting comments here. Therefore, email your comments to a new secure email addess and we will post them.