and now: new Email proof hillary sold influence at state Dept — Democrat leader called for special prosecutor
(Aug. 01, 2016)—There, we have said it. We believe that Hillary Clinton will go down in history as a key figure in a $1 trillion crime. Now we will prove it. The "smoking gun" evidence from her private email server was uncovered by corruption watchdog Judicial Watch.
Before his passing late last year, an internationally recognized Democrat luminary and historian called for a special prosecutor in the Leader v. Facebook patent infringement corruption case.
A special prosecutor was his suggestion because the normal judicial processes had broken down. He had been thoroughly briefed, according to multiple AFI contributing writers.
[Authors: Out of respect for the family’s privacy, we will not publish his name. May he rest in peace (and pray for us).]
Hillary’s Litany of Lies
Hillary Clinton’s litany of lies in her presidential nomination acceptance speech further reinforces the need for a special prosecutor.
Washington, D.C. cries out for new blood to restore equal protection under the law. The current Democratic Administration has consistently thwarted Leader Technologies’ efforts to find justice and a payday for their longsuffering investors who played it straight, took the risk and now deserve their entrepreneurial reward.
Leader Technologies’ fight for justice is every American’s fight for the Rule of Law and fair play. If Americans do not step up and DEMAND justice in Leader v. Facebook, then the U.S. Constitution is a pointless piece of paper.
Remarkably, Hillary Clinton condemned her own corrupt actions as Secretary of State when she said:
HILLARY: “I believe that our economy isn’t working the way it should because our democracy isn’t working the way it should.”
Hillary and Bill’s scandals are CAUSING our democracy/republic to sputter.
The list of the Clinton's undemocratic actions is now a litany: Whitewater, Benghazi, Travelgate, Vince Foster, Marc Rich, Frank Giustra, UrAsia, Uranium One, The Clinton Foundation, The Clinton Global Initiative, theft of social networking invention, the body count and State Department influence pedaling.
According to Hillary these are all misunderstandings created by a "vast right wing conspiracy." (Clue to interpreting Hillary: Saul Alinsky, her mentor, in Rules for Radicals: If your scheme is exposed, deny, deny, deny.)
Guilty by her own hand
The secret contracts Hillary wrote with Facebook are completely on her. These contracts were concealed from the House Oversight Committee and stonewalled from Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. It took an order by district court Judge Sullivan to pry them loose. These Facebook contracts prove Hillary's criminal activity. She cannot blame others since only a small group of her senior State Department staffers even knew she had done it.
Lie #1: Hillary called America a “democracy”
America is not a democracy. America is a republic. This difference is crucial to a proper understanding of American governance. It is not mere semantics.
Hillary’s misleading words telegraph the progressive agenda to destroy the Constitution and remake America in their image. Hillary’s oligarchy of globalists want power, permanently. Such is the long history of pure democracy where the more powerful majority abuses the disenfranchised minority.
Instead, America’s founders chose a republican democracy where the rights of the majority prevail without infringing the rights of minorities.
Rule of Law Rule of Men
Our fallible, flawed group of founders reached beyond their individual weaknesses and prejudices to conceive a brilliant form of governance that transcends time and human shortcomings. It is called the Rule of Law over the Rule of Men.
In a republican democracy equal justice is the right of every citizen whether in the majority or minority. This principle is the backbone of the U.S. Constitution.
This gift of the founders to the world is encapsulated in Benjamin Franklin’s answer to his Philadelphia friend and keen political observer, Mrs. Powel (yes, one “L”). She lived at Powel House (now 244 South 3rd Street) near Independence Hall.
Mrs. Powel, a woman with no right to vote, is credited with almost single handedly convincing George Washington to run for a second term. She persuaded General Washington that he must run to prove that the republican ideal was not merely an idealistic fluke. Imagine that, one woman changed the political course of humankind.
The day the Declaration of Independence was signed, Mrs. Powel asked Mr. Franklin what form of government the framers had given us. Monarchy? Democracy? Franklin replied:
“A republic, if you can keep it.”
Founder Thomas Jefferson reinforced Franklin's “if you can keep it” caveat when he wrote:
“Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.”
These men and women knew there was no room for complacency among the citizenry in a republican democracy. [The authors believe the current rise of populism among Trump and Sanders supporters emerges from this font of wisdom. The citizens have awakened.]
Hillary and the globalist clearly want to destroy the American republican priority for the Rule of Law. They want to "disaggregate" it (from A New World Order (2004) by Hillary political adviser and George Soros in-law Anne-Marie Slaughter) into a two-tiered system, one for the so-called Progressives and a different one for the Great Unwashed. Then, their permanent majority would make the rules in their image, permanently.
Frighteningly, this was essentially the state of the American British Colony courts in 1776 who were overridden regularly by King George.
With a globalist ascension in Hillary Clinton, the 240-year flame of The Great American Experiment will be extinguished, we believe.
Lie #2: Hillary said she is a champion of small business, entrepreneurs and innovation
In her acceptance speech Hillary said she was a champion of small business. However, in Hillary's world of doublespeak “innovation” is a euphemism for intellectual property theft for the benefit of her ruling globalist oligarchs.
Indeed, the U.S. Patent Office has become Hillary's globalist toy box of free goodies where real inventors are exploited to enrich her friends.
Let's face it, when it comes to true innovation, globalists are lazy. They reason: “Why do the hard work of inventing when we can simply steal it? If sued, they buy off everyone in the litigation path: agencies, commissioners, chairs, judges, jurists, witnesses, experts, attorneys, law firms, clerks, examiners. Such is the massive globalist Ponzi scheme being unearthed. No wonder even Republican corporate types are flocking to Hillary. The true source of their product ideas is being exposed as a fraud.
Adolf Hitler allowed this very model prior to World War II with German companies who were left alone as long as they did his bidding. The Soviets essentially did the same thing by nationalizing industry and declaring State ownership of all property.
Judicial Watch caught Hillary’s hand in the cookie jar
Thankfully, corruption watchdog Judicial Watch caught Hillary’s hand in the proverbial cookie jar. They unearthed unequivocal proof from Hillary’s private email servers that she obstructed justice in the Leader v. Facebook patent infringement case and benefited from the stolen property.
The Facebook contracts on Hillary’s private email server had been stonewalled by the State Department. They detail a staggering scheme to rig U.S. elections. Those contracts are detailed below.
In short, Hillary helped the theft of Leader Technologies’ invention of social networking in 2009. Then she exploited it for her “eDiplomacy” strategy as Secretary of State. She promoted Facebook in her speeches. She even organized a private dinner on Mar. 22, 2012 with Facebook COO Sheryl L. Sandberg just months before the Facebook initial public offering. Her emails discuss how she field tested uses of Facebook and then issued State Department Facebook field guides (likely published much earlier than the versions in Hillary’s private email)
. . . all the while Leader v. Facebook proceeded from the Federal Circuit Court to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Leader Technologies, Inc., Columbus, Ohio filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Facebook on Nov. 19, 2008
In 2009 Hillary Clinton and the State Department confiscated McKibben's invention for her personal "eDiplomacy" policy use. During this same time, McKibben and Leader were battling Facebook in Delaware federal district court for patent infringement. Leader proved on 11 of 11 claims that the engine running Facebook is their invention. Hillary's Judicial Watch emails prove she obstructed justice in the case and engaged in election rigging
Columbus innovator Leader Technologies and its founder Michael McKibben alleged and proved on 11 of 11 claims that the engine running Facebook is Leader’s patented invention. U.S. Patent No. 7,130,761 McKibben et al.
The court ruled that Facebook was guilty of all 11 infringement claims. Subsequently, a corrupt federal court system circled the wagons around Facebook all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in utter defiance of U.S. law. On Sep. 26, 2009, while discovery was proceeding in Leader v. Facebook, Hillary and the State Department contracted with Facebook for “a template for winning elections using advance Facebook marketing.”
It is illegal for a government agency or official to interfere in an active lawsuit according to 18 U.S. Code § 1505—Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees. “Proceedings” is a broad term for essentially any official government activity in courts, agencies, grand juries and Congress.
These contracts were part of a trove of documents from Hillary’s private email servers. They prove unequivocally that Hillary obstructed justice in Leader v. Facebook. If for no other reason, because Facebook personnel were potential witnesses. By tampering with Facebook witnesses, Hillary prejudiced Leader Technologies’ rights to a fair and impartial tribunal and noninterference by public officials and agencies.
Facebook’s project manager on Hillary’s contracts was Dmitry Shevelenko. Hillary entered at least five contracts for “a template for winning elections using advanced Facebook marketing” before the 2010 midterm elections. All during this period, the Leader v. Facebook lawsuit moved from trial into appeal.
See previous AFI post for full analysis of the Hillary contracts with Facebook.
|Some of Hillary’s election rigging contracts (2009-2010) with Facebook during Leader v. Facebook|
|Purpose: Facebook’s Dmitry Shevelenko: “a template for winning elections using advanced Facebook marketing” See Fig. 4 below.|
|Sep. 26, 2009||$120,000||Judicial Watch (GSA removed)|
|Apr. 09, 2010||$168,000||GSA|
|Aug. 19, 2010||$40,000||GSA|
|Sep. 01, 2010||$40,800||GSA|
|Sep. 30, 2010||$265,000||Judicial Watch (GSA removed)|
|Table 1: GSA contracts between the U.S. Department of State and Facebook prior to the 2010 midterm elections.
Sources: Judicial Watch / U.S. Department of State / GSA.
Hillary’s smoking guns
Dmitry Shevelenko LinkedIn profile boasts about FaCebook election rigging contracts with U.S. State Department
Hillary’s private email server evidence provided by the State Department to Judicial Watch is proof on its face that Hillary obstructed justice in Leader v. Facebook. She tampered with witnesses and prejudiced Leader Technologies’ rights to a fair and impartial tribunal.
When Google Met WikiLeaks provides more evidence
In an extract titled "Google is not what it seems" from Julian Assange's book When Google Met WikiLeaks (2014, O/R Books), he reveals more damning evidence of Hillary's obstruction of justice in Leader v. Facebook.
On Oct. 16, 2009, Hillary's State Department funded the second in three conferences in Mexico City named the Youth Movement Summit. In Hillary's big-screen remote presentation to the attendees, she promoted Facebook, YouTube (Google) and Twitter (three spy-state creatures of the secret White House intelligence agency formed by Bill Clinton in 1995 by executive order) to support her eDiplomacy, 21st century statecraft strategy contrived by her political advisers Anne-Marie Slaughter and Sidney Blumenthal to promote the globalist agenda of The Clinton Foundation (TCF) / Clinton Global Initiative (CGI).
In short, Hillary videotaped her personal Leader v. Facebook obstruction of justice as Secretary of State, which is an agregious violation of 18 U.S. Code 1505 - obstruction of proceedings.
obstruction of justice by Hillary in Leader v. Facebook demands a special prosecutor
Despite Leader proving that Facebook infringes its patent on 11 of 11 claims, the federal courts circled the wagons around Hillary’s darling Facebook and illegally confiscated Leader’s property. Notably, all of the judges held substantial Facebook financial interests in an evident collusion to enrich and influence senior judiciary in the run up to Facebook's initial public offering.
Barack Obama exploited Facebook. Hillary and the State Department exploited it. The Patent Office exploited it.
When government systems breakdown or cannot be impartial, special prosecutors are called for.
Hillary’s obstruction of justice and confiscation of private property in Leader v. Facebook requires a special prosecutor.
Damages to Leader could top $1 trillion
Hillary participated in the confiscation of Leader Technologies’ social networking patent. The IBM Eclipse Foundation became the distribution medium for providing Leader’s invention to the entire “social” technology world who put their morals, ethics and American property law on the shelf and have exploited it as well.
The value of the social networking easily reaches the $1 trillion number. If all of that value is founded upon Leader’s invention, which it appears to be, then Hillary is liable for the Greatest Financial Crime in the History of the World.
* * *
Notice: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Photos used are for educational purposes only and were obtained from public sources. No claims whatsoever are made to any photo.
Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to firstname.lastname@example.org and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.