CLINTON 2005 URANIUM JUNKET NETTED $152 MILLION FOR CLINTON FOUNDATION AND $3.1 BILLION FOR DONOR

VIDEO: Breyer and Zuckerberg solicited Stanford students seven weeks after Clinton's trip

Contributing Writers | Opinion | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION  | Jan. 29, 2016, Feb. 11, 2016 | PDF

Fig. 1—More Pay-to-Play New World Order Questions for Hillary clinton

On Sep. 6, 2005, Bill Clinton met with Kazakh strongman Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Two days later, Bill’s friend, Frank Giustra, received coveted Kazakh uranium mining rights—even though Giustra had no uranium mining track record. The industry was stunned. Within months, The Clinton Foundation received $152 million in “donations” from Frank Giustra. Two years later, Giustra sold those rights for $3.1 billion. Hillary and Bill did not disclose their Foundation winnings until forced to recently by Canadian authorities. Goldman Sachs assisted Giustra, and everyone else swirling around the Clinton's New World Order community organizing.

Photo: Reuters / Shamil Zhumatov SZH/DH.

 

(Jan. 29, 2016)—On Sep. 06, 2005, Bill Clinton jetted to Kazakhstan with Canadian Frank Giustra in a hastily arranged meeting with President Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Giustra had just incorporated a shell (new, not operating) company named UrAsia Energy Ltd. with the help of Goldman Sachs.

Fig. 3—Frank Giustra, UrAsia Energy Ltd.

In the previous nine months, Clinton had been paid $925,000 in fees for six speeches to Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. [The issue is not the amount of the fees, however dubious, but rather the audience. We believe that Bill and Hillary's speaking engagements have merely been the smokescreen for their New World Order global community organizing.

Fig. 2–Anne-Marie Slaughter

Anne-Marie Slaughter, author of A New World Order, was one of Hillary's first hires as Secretary of State on Jan. 23, 2009, just three days after Obama's inauguration.]

While Bill was busy with Goldman Sachs and the uranium deal, Accel Partners invested $13 million in Facebook on May 26, 2005. A week later, Yuri Milner started Digital Sky in Moscow with Goldman Sachs as an investor. Accel Partners and Milner are Facebook’s second and third largest shareholders today. Goldman Sachs is one of Facebook's underwriters who sponsored Facebook's initial public offering (IPO).

Read synopsis

Fig. 4—A New World Order by Anne-Marie Slaughter. Princeton University Press (2004).

On Sep. 07, 2005, a day later, Kazakhstan agreed to give UrAsia coveted uranium mining rights, even though Giustra had no uranium mining experience, and UrAsia was only a shell company. The mining industry was stunned.

Clinton Played, Giustra Paid

In the months that followed, the Clinton Foundation received $152 million in donations from Giustra. Both Giustra and Clinton claim the donations were not pay to play. To paraphrase William Huntgate, a member of the Watergate Committee: "If an elephant walked into the room, some of you would insist that it was a mouse with a glandular condition." [Insert suitable snarky comment here.]

Bookmark: #breyer-zuckerberg-stanford-video

VIDEO: On Oct. 26, 2005, nine weeks later, Accel Partners’ James W. Breyer and Mark Zuckerberg spoke to Stanford University students about Facebook. During the presentation, they solicited the students to write apps to run on Facebook. That solicitation was captured on video.

Is the questioner a ringer? Watch Breyer's and Zuckerberg's body language.

Fig. 5—On Oct. 26, 2005, James W. Breyer and Mark E. Zuckerberg likely committed a crime. We believe they fraudulently solicited Stanford University students to help them write applications to run on Facebook. Facebook's software engine is the invention of Columbus, Ohio innovators Leader Technologies and their founder, Michael T. McKibben. Breyer and Zuckerberg were thus engaged in fraudulent inducement to misappropriate property that did not belong to them. The fact that they crossed state lines to commit this crime would amount to racketeering under the RICO Act, among other offenses. In our opinion. Click here to go directly to 49 minutes and 11 seconds into this one hour video capture at Stanford University. Click here for the raw video file (*.mp4).

Image: Stanford University

Since Facebook was proven in federal court to have been using Leader Technologies’ social networking invention, Breyer’s and Zuckerberg’s Oct. 26, 2005 solicitation would be fraudulent inducement, and this Stanford video is hard evidence of The Greatest Financial Crime in the History of the World.

Hillary Clinton’s stonewalled emails revealed her promotion of Facebook “E-diplomacy” from the start of her tenure as Secretary of State in early 2009. At that time, the Leader v. Facebook patent infringement trial was only months old. Hillary’s policy grossly interfered with Leader Technologies’ due process rights.

In the only part of the Leader v. Facebook trial that Hillary’s lawyer cronies could not control, the jury, Leader Technologies proved on 11 of 11 counts that Facebook infringes Leader’s U.S. Patent No. 7,139,761 for social networking.

Clinton Foundation's $152 million primed the Facebook pump

Bill Clinton’s $152 million in Foundation donations from Frank Giustra appear to have been the seed money that Accel Partners and Goldman Sachs needed to get the Leader Technologies’ social networking invention ready for Barack Obama’s out-of-the-blue presidential announcement on Feb. 10, 2007, sixteen months later

The Clintons & Racketeering

The RICO Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) requires proof of a "pattern of racketeering" activity. A pattern defined as two or more activities where the person directly or indirectly invests in, maintains an interest in, participates in, conducts the affairs of, or acquires income used to acquire an interest in an enterprise, among other things.

The U.S. Supreme Court said about racketeering of the kind described in Bill Clinton's 2005 conduct alone:

“[A] democracy is effective only if the people have faith in those who govern, and that faith is bound to be shattered when high officials and their appointees engage in activities which arouse suspicions of malfeasance and corruption.” (United States v. Miss. Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520, 562 [1961]).

Bookmark: #clinton-uranium-pay-to-play-timeline

Here is the sequence of Bill Clinton events in this uranium deal corruption. Also evident is the support Goldman Sachs gave at every turn.

A Pattern of Clinton Public Corruption (Bill was our former President, he knew better) Corrected Feb. 01, 2016

Date	Subject	Who	Goldman Sachs benefited	Where	Benefit
					For Clinton	For Clinton cronies
Dec. 03, 2004	Clinton speech	Goldman Sachs	X	New York NY	$125,000
Mar. 02, 2005	Wininchina LLP	Accel Partners	X	Hong Kong		Wall Street
Apr. 20, 2005	Clinton speech	Goldman Sachs	X	Kiawah Island GA	$125,000
May. 04, 2005	Clinton speech	Deutsche Bank	?	Baltimore MD	$125,000
May 26, 2005	Facebook	Accel Partners	X	Palo Alto CA		$13 million
Jun. 01, 2005	Digital Sky	Yuri Milner	X	Moscow Russia		Wall Street
Jun. 06, 2005	Clinton speech	Goldman Sachs	X	Paris, France	$250,000
Jun. 13, 2005	Clinton speech	Goldman Sachs	X	Greensboro GA	$150,000
Aug. 11, 2005	Clinton speech	Deutsche Bank	?	New York NY	$150,000
Sep. 06, 2005	Uranium	UrAsia	X	Kazakhstan	Access	Access
Sep. 07, 2005	Uranium deal	UrAsia	X	Kazakhstan	Access	Contracts
Sep. 08, 2005 to Sep. 09, 2006	Foundation	UrAsia	X	Toronto CN	$152 million
Oct. 26, 2005	Stanford	Accel Partners	X	Palo Alto CA		Illegal apps
Feb. 10, 2007	U.S. candidacy	Barack Obama	X	Springfield IL	Secretary of State	$431 billion Wall Street "bailout"
Feb. 12, 2007	UrAsia sale	UrAsia	X	Kazakhstan		$3.1 billion

Table 1—A pattern of corruption involving Bill Clinton, Goldman Sachs, Frank Giustra, James W. Breyer, Mark E. Zuckerberg and Facebook. See previous post AFI (Aug. 12, 2015). Hillary & Bill shill for a secret intelligence agency cartel. Americans For Innovation.

The evidence shows that the developments in Facebook were a direct function of Bill Clinton's collaboration with Goldman Sachs.

1. Bill met with Goldman Sachs, then Accel Partners invested in Facebook.
2. Bill spoke in Kazakhstan, then his friend Frank Giustra (Goldman Sachs) received coveted uranium mining contracts for which he was not qualified (but Goldman Sachs wanted)
3. Bill started getting $152 million from Giustra, then Breyer and Zuckerberg induced Stanford students to write apps, after which Breyer secretly started WIN-IN-CHINA in Hong Kong, outside the knowledge of U.S. regulators (revealed by HSBC whistleblower Hervé Falciani).
4. Facebook was established with Bill's and Goldman Sachs' money, then Barack Obama announced his candidacy on the platform, eventually claiming that his presidency would "fundamentally transform America."
5. Hillary became Secretary of State intent on making Facebook a cornerstone of her E-diplomacy, irrespective of whether or not Facebook was violating patent law.

Bill Clinton evidently used his influence as America's former president to cajole President Nazarbayev to give the uranium mining contracts to UrAsia within a day, even though Frank Giustra had no experience in uranium mining (but Goldman Sachs had friends who did).

At every turn, Goldman Sachs and Bill Clinton are major players in the process.

Click here for a full timeline of this public corruption.

* * *

Bookmark: #jpmorgan-pay-to-play

Feb. 04, 2016 Update:
JPMorgan Pays-to-Play U.S. Courts

Danny A. DeVito, Skadden Arps LLP, JPMorgan's pay-to-play kingpin

Jamie Dimon, CEO, JPMorgan; Cartel puppet master

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.; declared Obamacare a tax; holds JPMorgan interests

Delaware District Judge Richard G. Andrews; Obama / Clinton puppet; admits JPMorgan interests

Delaware District Judge Sue L. Robinson; redefined "financial interest" just for judges (to hide holdings inside mutual funds)

Delarware District Judge Leonard P. Stark; Obama / Clinton puppet; destroyed due process in Leader v. Facebook

Professor James P. Chandler, III; the Clinton / Obama spy master and puller of the judicial strings for the Cartel; Leader Technologies' ne'er-do-well patent attorney

On Oct. 17, 2012, Bill Clinton gave a $200,000 pay-to-play junket speech to JPMorgan—just after JPMorgan made a fortune in Facebook's May 18, 2012 initial public offering. The collusion among America's senior federal judiciary with Wall Street and Silicon Valley is further evidenced in another patent case in addition to Leader v. Facebook. Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam, Internet pioneer and former director of network architecture at Sun Microsystems, yesterday filed a motion at the U.S. Supreme Court in her patent dispute with JPMorgan who is infringing her web transactions patent. JPMorgan is muscling the judges to throw out the case on wholly unsupported grounds. Dr. Arunachalam outlines massive JPMorgan conflicts of interest among the presiding judges—they all have substantial JPMorgan financial holdings. With the exception of Delaware district court judge Sue L. Robinson who recused, the judges have obstinately refused to recuse themselves despite Judge Richard G. Andrews' admission that he has JPMorgan holdings. JPMorgan's attorney is Skadden Arps LLP. Hillary Clinton's former chief of staff, Christina M. Chen, worked for Skadden Arps LLP, as did Judge Leonard P. Stark, the very evidently corrupt Obama appointee, last-minute-entry-to-protect-Facebook-for-Hillary's-new-E-diplomacy-plan-and-the-IPO, and presiding judge in the Leader v. Facebook case.

Bookmark: #lynch-harvard-law

News Flash, Feb. 09, 2015:
White House Hillary email Interference: "Ask the Chinese & Israelis." Lynch: "no close ties" to Hillary false

News Flash, Feb. 10, 2016: Obama would become an "enemy of the state" to pardon Hillary for a SAP compromise. "Compromising a SAP is an absolute 'disqualifier' for public office and access to our nation's sensitive information - period." Read full article by Major Ed Coet (US Army, ret.)

A senior security insider who trains law enforcement in digital forensics reported to AFI investigators that Hillary's "smoking gun" treachery has likely been found, but that it is up to Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch to indict. This person believes Lynch will stonewall since the data fingers too many Washington insiders. The source complained about White House interference in the investigation, and said "The Chinese would be the ones that really know what went on with Hillary's server, along with the Israelis."

 Loretta E. Lynch's Harvard Law Support Group

Loretta E. Lynch,
Harvard Law

Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Harvard Law

Preetinder Bharara
Harvard Law

James P. Chandler,
Harvard Law

Michelle L. R. Obama,
Harvard Law

Barack H. Obama,
Harvard Law

See Hattem, J. (Feb. 08, 2016). Pressure on Lynch to step aside in Clinton email probe. The Hill. [Editors: Lynch claims "no close ties" to the Clintons. This is false. Lynch, a Harvard lawyer, is close to the shadowy spymaster, Professor James P. Chandler (see photo below), another Harvard lawyer and former patent attorney for Leader Technologies. Chandler was Bill Clinton's chief outside national security adviser and has been close to Billary for decades. Chandler recommended Eric H. Holder, Jr., yet another Harvard lawyer, as Attorney General, and is believed to have recommended Lynch to the Obamas, more Harvard lawyers. Preetinder Bharara is Obama's notorious NY U.S. Attorney legal hitman from Harvard Law. On Jan. 18, 2001, buried in his last acts as President, Bill Clinton appointed Chandler to the National Infrastructure Assurance Council (NIAC)—on Bill's last day as president. Chandler exploited this appointment secretly during the Bush years, and paved the way for the Obama IBM NSA Eclipse spy state. Some pundits now believe the illegal metadata collected by the NSA was used by Hillary and Bill to blackmail corporate leaders into large Clinton speaking fees and donations to The Clinton Foundation (see Original Post below). This would explain why the Clintons' fees and donations have been so suspiciously uniform and high ("Pay my fee or I'll expose you" is a strong motivator."]

10% to whistleblower(s)

Leader Technologies has indicated they are willing to pay a 10% reward for information that leads to the recovery of funds by their shareholders.

Bookmark: #stop-the-cartel

Letter to Congress:
Word Doc
PDF Doc

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment empowers Congress to legislate a payday for Leader Technologies shareholders. This would provide adequate financing for Leader to offer a rational social networking environment—one that offers the application utility that people have come to enjoy about Leader’s invention without sacrificing security and privacy.

Contact your elected representatives and ask them to use Congress' power of the purse to pay Leader Technologies and unplug the Cartel.

Fig. 6—Obama's Fundamental Transformation of America. His wheel of corruption.

Graphic: AFI.

Click here for hijack of the cyber world timeline and database.

Bookmark: #spy-state-surveillance

Fig. 7—The evidence is unmistakable. A Cartel of private companies, in collusion with the NSA, collect ALL relationship data between American citizens and the federal government. Much of that data is stored overseas, e.g., Lulea, Sweden, outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution ("Inside the Arctic Circle, Where Your Data Lives," Business Week).

Graphic: AFI.

Bookmark: #spy-state-players

Fig. 8—Primary Participants in the American NSA - C.I.A. Spy State "Public-Private" Cartel. See AFI. (Oct. 19, 2015). The social networking patent property case every American needs to fight. Americans For Innovation.

Graphic: AFI.

Notice: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself.

Comment

Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to amer4innov@gmail.com and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.