Americans for Innovation: December 2017

Friday, December 29, 2017

CORPORATE TRANSNATIONAL WARLORD PIRATES ARE ON THE RUN

Little known warlord chief F. William “Bill” McNabb recently stepped down from The Vanguard Group along with hundreds of prominent CEOs

Vanguard is the largest shareholder in most warlord companies

Vanguard fleeces investors to launder money for the rogue C.I.A.?

Chief Warlord

Frederick William "Bill" McNabb, III

The Vanguard Group

Frederick William 'Bill' McNabb steps down from The Vanguard Group along with hundreds of other prominent CEOs

Fig. 1: Frederick William (“Bill”) McNabb III, was appointed CEO of the Vanguard Group. McNabb organized Vanguard's effective control of the entire U.S. economy. Who knew? Only the insiders. By controlling all companies in all sectors, Vanguard played the markets against themselves and never losing. Vanguard's control over markets makes George Soros' hedge fund scams look like school yard antics. See Table 1 below.

Photo: The Wall Street Journal.

(Dec. 29, 2017)—President Trump’s new executive order has declared a “national emergency” as a declaration of war against all forms of crime – not just human trafficking and human rights abuses. Criminals from Saudi Arabia to Washington, D.C. knew this was coming from the moment Trump was elected. The Obama “age of lawlessness” has come to an end and the new sheriff in town is the fastest gunslinger (tweet-slinger) around.

That is why Frederick William “Bill” McNabb III, Eric Schmidt, and the 200 or so other top CEOs are resigning their compromised posts and running for cover.

Of course, some have already been called out for sexual harassment, pedophilia, and theft, among others crimes. Some are just resigning, gathering up their off-shore monies and hiding, while other the corporate Alpha Dogs are just moving to another position in the company in an effort to create distance from their crimes and possible plausible deniability before the second shoe drops.

The CEOs (corporate warlords) of some of the largest companies in the world have coincidentally “stepped down” at the same time that the first president in U.S. history formally announced a “national emergency.” President Trump has declared a type of war against every criminal in America, the international corporate world, and every country and organization in the world that wishes to break U.S. laws (including the United Nations who Trump has already “called out” for their crimes and begun to defund them).

It is great to see the roaches scatter when the exterminator shows up. Just look at the tidal waves that Trump recently caused in Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq, Turkey, Iran, etc., etc., etc. by simply announcing that America was now going to be moral and honest. Does the phrase “too much winning” come to mind?

Trump has named 13 international criminals in his executive order (EO) whose funds and assets have already been seized. He also mentioned in the EO that there is an Annex list that names 39 other criminals and/or criminal organizations (including foreign nations).

Thus, every criminal in the world who has an off-shore account is shaking in their boots. The U.S. Treasury can seize assets anywhere in the world and certainly have done so many times before through executive orders. But Trump’s new EO is the most comprehensive and all-encompassing war on transnational criminals ever written by a president.

The Anonymous Patriots told their subscribers what Eric Schmidt is up to with his continuing plans to take over the world after stepping down from being the CEO of Google.

But when we see the CEO of Vanguard—one of the largest investment companies in the world with over 5 trillion dollars in managed assets—step down from the cushiest CEO job in the world – you know that Trump has the lawless corporate warlords extremely nervous.

These corporate warlords are covering their criminal trails like Hillary bleaching her server.

Decades of negligent government oversight of huge transnational corporations, like Vanguard and Google, have lead the CEOs to be very careless in their crimes which created a long and clear trail of evidence that was ignored by the Daddy Bush / Clinton / Bush Jr. / Obama administrations. Crime had become a way of life and the Queen of Thieves was ready to ascend the ultimate throne of crime – the White House.

The CEO of Vanguard, Frederick William “Bill” McNabb III, like hundreds of other CEOs simply got out while they could because they certainly know that they are guilty and could come to be identified as one of the already named Annex list 39 that are going down next.

Fig. 2: Frederick William (“Bill”) McNabb III, presided over ALL the investments in the companies in the table below. Despite being the Lord of Lords over the American economy, he resigned unexpectedly on July 13, 2017. In large public companies, a 2+% holding is enough for effective controlling interest. See Table 1 below.

Trump will be known in history for bringing back the “rule of law” to a country that had already been sold out to the highest international bidders.

Bill, Hillary and Obama sold America out to China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, the United Nations, etc., etc., etc. through criminal conspiracies. International corporate warlords (including warlord brokers like Vanguard) sold America out in lock step with the Clintons.

Vanguard is the financial death star to a free people

For instance, Vanguard is the largest investor in companies that have the greatest number of U.S. military contracts. Vanguard is the “poster corporation” for the military industrial complex that sells war to both sides and profits double. Vanguard is also a criminal enterprise that has been sued many times and has avoided approximately $65 billion in taxes through spurious means.

Vanguard is beyond a monopoly—they were our NWO task masters

Energy

BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Eni SpA, Exxon, Haliburton, Kinder Morgan, Occidental Petroleum, Phillips 66, Schlumberger Ltd—the best of the energy warlords.

Banks

Vanguard is the largest stockholder in JPMorgan, Bank of America, Blackrock, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Canada, State Street Corp, UBS, Wells Fargo—the best of the warlord bankers.

Telecom

Vanguard is the largest stockholder in AT&T, Verizon, CenturyLink, Frontier Communications, T-Mobile—the best of the warlord telecoms.

Media

Vanguard is the largest stockholder in 21st Century Fox, ABC, CBS, CNN (Time Warner), Comcast (NBC), Disney, News Corp, Viacom—the best of the warlord media companies.

Internet/Technology

Vanguard is the largest stockholder in IBM, Samsung, Canon, Intel, Google, Qualcomm, GE, Microsoft, LG Corp, Taiwan Semiconductor, Sony, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Baidu ADR, Cisco, Dell/VMWare, Genentech, Juniper Networks, Netflix, Oracle, Twitter, Verisign, Visa, Wal-Mart, Xerox, Zynga—the best of the modern Internet warlords.

Pharma

Vanguard is the largest stockholder in Abbott Labs, Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Pfizer, Roche—the best of the Big Pharma warlords (working to extinguish you).

Military

Vanguard is the largest shareholder in BAE Systems, Boeing, General Dynamics, Humana, L3 Communications, Lockheed-Martin (second largest), Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, United Technologies—the best of the supreme warlords.

Message to McNabb: You can run but you cannot hide

Frederick William “Bill” McNabb III has very good reasons to obfuscate his CEO decisions that were criminal. This type of criminal corporate behavior was accepted as “standard operating procedure” during the Clinton/Bush/Obama administrations, which condoned unregulated corporate fleecing of America that was not policed by the criminally compromised Department of Justice.

To Frederick William “Bill” McNabb III, prior CEO of Vanguard, and Eric Schmidt, prior CEO of Google, and the other hundreds of CEOs “stepping down” from positions at the top of the corporate pyramid, we have a message for you—You can run but you cannot hide!

Why is Trump Targeting Transnational Corporations?

When you look at the shareholders of the largest corporate military contractors, media companies, technology companies, patent holders, Internet companies, telecommunications companies, you find Vanguard.

Vanguard is a notorious warlord corporation that is owned by banks and a network of corporations who are all interconnected.

Trump is up against warlord brokers and bankers who own 43,000 transnational companies which comprise 60% of the world’s income.

The top 1,300 transnational companies generate about 20% of the world’s income, and 80% of the ownership of the top 1300 corporations is in the hands of 737 corporations world-wide.

Of those 737 corporations, 147 corporations directly own 40% of the income. These corporations in turn own industry, oil, weapons, perpetual military contracts, pharmaceuticals, food, telecom, IT and the other profitable companies—especially war related.

Essentially, these elite corporations own each other through shared stock and investments.

These transnational corporations have silently declared war on America years ago and were winning until Trump came to office.

Vanguard is an excellent example of the type of transnational criminal corporations that Trump has declared war upon. He has already “kicked ass” (seized assets) and “taken names” (the Annex list of 39). Interestingly enough, some of the names on Trump’s “naughty” list are good friends of Hillary and Bill.

The bottom line is basically that the CEOs jumping ship are simply letting Trump know that they are guilty and should be put on his “naughty” list, if they were not already there to begin with.

Is Vanguard on Trump’s Naughty List?

CEO McNabb has been involved in Vanguard’s many financial scams. For instance, by design, the Vanguard Group does not earn any profits, even though every other major mutual fund company does. This is an elaborate way of paying less or no taxes. In one case, Vanguard did not charge its own “member” investors $19.8 billion in investment fees in 2007 and did not pay almost $35 billion in taxes.

In June of 2017, Vanguard had to pay Brazil’s Petrobras shareholders $445 million over corruption charges. While Petrobras managed to settle with most of the shareholders out of court, a class-action suit in which plaintiffs claim tens of billions of dollars in damages remains active in New York federal court.

The Vanguard Group is not an independent company; it is owned by all the investors in Vanguard mutual funds, and one board of directors oversees both. Vanguard Group does not take a profit from the mutual funds it manages because of its unique structure. Making a profit matters because of a widely used tax dodge involving related companies, known as transfer pricing.

The goal of such maneuvers is earning “stateless income,” so-called because no government taxes the profit. This is tax evasion, plain and simple. Also, another scam at Vanguard is that nobody has any idea what anyone at Vanguard makes as salary. They can pay themselves whatever they want because it’s a “black box without any disclosures.”

Does Vanguard sound like a corporation that might be, or need to be, on Trump’s Annex list of 39 criminals?

The 200 or more corporate CEOs who have recently resigned might just be the tip of the iceberg. Trump has upset the applecart of DC lawlessness and the criminal apple venders don’t know which way to run first to pick up their apples.

It sounds like the Art of the Deal may actually be the Art of War.

Vanguard steals patents & trade secrets to create new value

On Aug. 06, 2009, IBM’s chief intellectual property counsel David J. Kappos was appointed director of the U.S. Patent Office by Barack Obama in a rare recess appointment. Notably, Kappos had to quickly sell off his up to $2.5 million in IBM stock in one month between Aug. 19 – Nov. 16, 2009.

A week later Kappos hurriedly purchased up to $1.1 million in Vanguard mutual funds, on Oct. 27, 2009.

Two weeks after Kappos bought Vanguard exclusively, Facebook filed a complaint with Kappos’ new Patent Office.

They asked Kappos to invalidate Leader’s patent on social networking using a bizarre unconstitutional “reexamination” provision that confiscates property rights already granted. The “reexamination” concept was promoted by none other than Leader Technologies former patent attorney James P. Chandler, III in the mid-1990’s under Bill Clinton.

Facebook subsequently lost these invalidation arguments three times before asking Kappos a fourth time to invoke never-used directorial power to invalidate the patent just before he departed in 2013.

As readers can see from the table below, Vanguard is now Facebook’s largest shareholder.

Vanguard is now IBM’s largest shareholder where Kappos worked for twenty-five years.

Vanguard is the largest shareholder in all the underwriter banks for Facebook’s initial public offering in which all the judges in the Leader v. Facebook lawsuit held substantial financial interests.

IBM is the largest holder of patents in the world.

Remarkably, the 12 largest patent grants in 2016 are ALL members of the IBM Eclipse Foundation. Eclipse was used to distribute Leader Technologies’ social networking invention to these companies after its formation on Nov. 29, 2001.

As described earlier, Vanguard is the largest shareholder in ALL of the chief beneficiaries of Leader Technologies’ social networking invention.

Bookmark: #vanguard-holdings

The Vanguard Group holdings in: (a) the top 12 patent grantees in 2016, plus Facebook, (b) banks and underwriters promoting the Facebook initial public offering, (c) technology/social companies, (d) mainstream media, (e) telecommunications companies, (f) military-industrial companies, (g) pharmaceutical companies, (h) energy companies
Year:		2009 Patents issued		2016 Patents issued		2009-current	2017
Company:		Rank:	No. of Patents Issued in the year:	Rank:	No. of Patents Issued in the year:	IBM Eclipse Foundation Member:	%-age	The Vanguard Group holdings in the Company:
(a) Patent Holders:
Co.	Stock Ticker:
IBM	IBM	1	4,887	1	8,023	Yes	12.92	Largest
Samsung	005930	2	3,592	2	5,504	Yes	02.72	Second*
Canon	7751	4	2,241	3	3,865	Yes	04.03	Largest
Intel	INTC	10	1,134	4	3,414	Yes	13.85	Largest
Google	GOOGL	144	141	5	3,267	Yes	05.93	Largest
Qualcomm	QCOM	60	356	6	3,118	Yes	15.87	Largest
GE	GE	11	1,739	7	2,566	Yes	13.79	Largest
Microsoft	MSFT	3	2,929	8	2,558	Yes	13.80	Largest
LG Corp	006570	11	1,064	9	2,426	Yes	02.85	Largest
Taiwan Semi	TSM	67	311	10	2,261	Yes	02.55	Largest
Sony	SNE	8	1,565	11	2,168	Yes	01.84	Largest
Apple	AAPL	72	289	12	2,101	Yes	12.50	Largest
Facebook	FB	~	20	90	442	Yes	11.42	Largest
(b) Banks: (Facebook Underwriters)		Stock Ticker / Direct Vanguard Group Ownership (%) (not including prorated ownership of other Top 10 stockholders which may double or triple these numbers. In these large companies, these ownership %-ages are controlling.)				Click here for zipped PDF package (*.zip, 10.8 MB)
JPMorgan		JPM		14.23		Yes		Largest
Bank of America		BAC		12.97		Yes		Largest
Blackrock		BLK		12.28		Yes		Largest
Citigroup		C		13.89		Yes		Largest
Deutsche Bank		DB		04.18		Yes		Largest
Goldman Sachs		GS		12.19		Yes		Largest
Morgan Stanley		MS		09.79		Yes		Third
Royal Bank of Canada		RY		04.16		Yes		Second
State Street Corp		STT		12.26		Yes		Largest
T. Rowe Price Group		TROW		12.79		Yes		Largest
UBS		UBS		04.99		Yes		Largest
Wells Fargo		WFC		12.26		Yes		Largest
(c) Technology/Social:
Amazon		AMZN		11.85		Yes		Largest
Baidu ADR		BIDU		09.90		Yes		Largest
Cisco		CSCO		15.04		Yes		Largest
Dell/VMWare		DVMT		17.36		Yes		Largest
Genentech		ROG		17.23		Yes		Largest
Juniper Networks		JNPR		18.85		Yes		Largest
Netflix		NFLX		12.16		Yes		Largest
Oracle		ORCL		09.83		Yes		Largest
Symantec		SYMC		18.35		Yes		Largest
Twitter		TWTR		13.00		Yes		Largest
Verisign		VRSN		17.55		Yes		Largest
Visa		V		10.32		Yes		Largest
Wal-Mart		WMT		06.81		Yes		Largest
Xerox		XRX		16.35		Yes		Largest
Zynga		ZNGA		13.67		Yes		Largest
(d) Media:
21st Century Fox		FOXA		09.31		Yes		Largest
ABC (Disney)		DIS		13.60		Yes		Largest
CBS		CBS		10.82		Yes		Largest
CNN (Time Warner)		TMX		11.82		Yes		Largest
Comcast (NBC)		CMCSA		13.60		Yes		Largest
Disney		DIS		13.60		Yes		Largest
News Corp		NWSA		17.06		Yes		Largest
Viacom		VIAB		16.67		Yes		Largest
(e) Telecommunications:
AT&T		T		13.22		Yes		Largest
Verizon		VZ		14.39		Yes		Largest
CenturyLink		CTL		18.90		Yes		Largest
Frontier Comm.		FTR		19.18		Yes		Largest
T-Mobile		TMUS		03.43		Yes		Largest
(f) Military-Industrial:
Boeing		BA		11.55		Yes		Largest
General Dynamics		GD		14.13		Yes		Largest
Humana		HUM		12.72		Yes		Largest
L3 Communications		LLL		20.91		Yes		Largest
Lockheed-Martin		LMT		14.20		Yes		Second
Monsanto		MON		15.00		Yes		Largest
Northrop Grumman		NOC		15.23		Yes		Largest
Raytheon		RTN		15.61		Yes		Largest
United Technologies		UTX		14.97		Yes		Largest
(g) Pharmaceuticals:
Abbott Labs		ABT		16.14		Yes		Largest
Abbvie		ABBV		13.16		Yes		Largest
Amgen		AMGN		14.44		Yes		Largest
Biogen		BIIB		20.40		Yes		Largest
Bristol-Meyers Squibb		BMY		18.73		Yes		Largest
Eli Lilly		LLY		19.29		Yes		Largest
Gilead Sciences		GILD		13.29		Yes		Largest
Johnson & Johnson		JNJ		14.97		Yes		Largest
Merck		MRK		16.03		Yes		Largest
Pfizer		PFE		14.58		Yes		Largest
Roche		ROG		17.23		Yes		Largest
(h) Energy:
BP		BP		00.89		Yes		Largest
Chevron		CVX		15.08		Yes		Largest
ConocoPhillips		COP		15.65		Yes		Largest
Eni SpA		E-ENI-SPA		00.24		Yes		Largest
Exxon		XOM		14.28		Yes		Largest
Haliburton		HAL		13.01		Yes		Largest
Kinder Morgan		KMI		13.51		Yes		Largest
Occidental Petroleum		OXY		14.08		Yes		Largest
Phillips 66		PSX		14.18		Yes		Largest
Schlumberger Ltd		SLB		13.77		Yes		Largest
Table 1: Companies in which Vanguard holds a controlling interest.

Bookmark: #mcnabb-bio

Frederick William “Bill” McNabb Resume (NWO cutout)

Year	Mo/Day	Organization/Location	Title/Activity
1957		Alexandria VA	Born
1979		Dartmouth College	BA
1979-1983		Haverford School	Teacher, Coach
1983		UPenn - Wharton School of Business	MBA
1986		The Vanguard Group, Inc.	Joined
1995		The Vanguard Group, Inc.	Managing Director, Institutional and International Businesses
2008	Mar 01	The Vanguard Group, Inc. , Vanguard Plc	President, Director
2008	Aug 31	The Vanguard Group, Inc. , Vanguard Plc	CEO
2010 - Present	Jan	The Vanguard Group, Inc. , Vanguard Plc	Chairman
Unknown		Investment Company Institute	Member, Board of Governors
Unknown		Vanguard Marketing Corporation	Director
Unknown		Zoological Society of Philadelphia, Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce	Director
2012	Aug 09	Vanguard Investment Series Public Limited Company	Director, retired
2012	Aug 09	Vanguard Group (Ireland) Limited	Director, retired
2017	Jul	The Vanguard Group, Inc. , Vanguard Plc	Resigned as CEO (effective Jan 01, 2018)
Table 2: Frederick William ("Bill") McNabb III Biograhy.

McNabb, presided over ALL the investments in the table above, resigned unexpectedly on July 13, 2017.

Spread the word. These criminals must be shut down by We The People.

Thank you to the American Intelligence Media Conclave for assistance with this post.

***

Friday, December 22, 2017

THE URANIUM ONE TREASON: WHY ROBERT MUELLER MUST BE REMOVED AND HIS PARTISAN HIT SQUAD DISMANTLED

Roger Stone Speaks: On Nov. 18, 2017, Twitter censored Roger Stone completely. We must break this embargo and support Roger's First Amendment right to Free Speech. Click here to read and share Roger's latest perspectives on the Battle for our Republic, including his responses to his critics (who have not been censored)

Op-Ed by Roger stone

Roger Stone calls for Meuller to be dismissed, and indicted himself for high crimes

Graphic: Getty Images/WPA Pool, Getty Images/Alex Wong, Reuters/Jim Young.

Bookmark: #roger-stone-cspan-interview

Breaking! Dec. 22, 2017: Roger Stone C-Span Interview on the Robert Mueller Hit Squad
https://www.c-span.org/video/?438879-1/newsmakers-roger-stone

Update: DEc. 27, 2017: Why do you think these 50 CEO's suddenly resigned? Could this be the Podesta connection everyone is talking about?

(Dec. 22, 2017)—President Donald Trump has only one viable option to repel the partisan lynch mob now nipping at his heels in the form of a taxpayer-funded pack of legal hyenas. These hyenas are masquerading as objective prosecutors under the droopy eyes of old reliable deep state hatchet man Robert Swan Mueller III, the special counsel appointed to “investigate” the Clinton-Podesta-Schiff-Democrat Party-Corporate Media fabricated Russia collusion delusion.

As the GOP Congress finally begins to stir, as events make it increasingly impossible to deny the true nature of Mueller’s handpicked partisan hit squad of Trump-hating, Hillary-supporting D.C. swamp lawyers and arrogant federal careerists, as firings and other departures quickly erode the carefully-contrived, totally-counterfeit veneer of credibility ascribed to Mueller and his hench-people, my advice to the president has only become more apropos…and more imperative.

President Trump can, and must, kill two birds with one Stone.

First, the president must completely disempower and dismantle Robert S. Mueller’s fraudulent rogue prosecution gang, which is merely an extension of a larger corruption of power that is unparalleled in our history.

Second, the president must use every resource at his disposal to prosecute the almost-seditious abuses of power by lawless Clinton-Obama FBI and NSA apparatchiks who:

1) Politically weaponized the federal government’s electronic intelligence capabilities to spy on a presidential candidate and his campaign,

2) Colluded with foreign and non-state intelligence agents to manufacture evidence used as false pretexts for securing Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) warrants(s) that employed the national security laws of the United States to give illicit, illegal cover to this political espionage,

3) Used the fruits of this political espionage activity to damage or otherwise hinder this candidate after he had become president-elect and eventually president of the United States through surreptitious releases of the criminally-procured information,

4) Fabricated and instigated false allegations about foreign state collusion implicating the president’s election campaign and family members, and

5) Perpetuated this massive criminal fraud on the American people for nearly a full year by manipulating and abusing the investigatory and prosecutorial powers of the Department of Justice.

To this end, President Trump must begin at the intersection of these seditious current and former federal officials who had previously facilitated and covered up a similarly-breathtaking criminal fraud on the country during the previous presidential administration, to include the previous president.

The president must order his attorney general to appoint a special counsel to investigate the Obama-Clinton-Mueller-Rosenstein criminal collusion that enriched the Clinton-Democrat crime syndicate by hundreds of millions of dollars and further embedded the power of the deep state operators who facilitated the multi-billion-dollar Uranium One pay-to-play scam.

This incredible scheme perpetrated by the criminal Clintons — and their coterie of minions and fellow travelers — implicates top officials of our federal government…including and especially the U.S Department of Justice, including and especially Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein.

An investigation is manifestly in the best interests of this country and of justice. It is not some political maneuver against the president’s cynical partisan persecutors or some clever machination to spare his presidency from the illegitimate cabal that is single-minded in its intent to fraudulently remove the president from office, by any means possible.

This course of action by the president is both legally and constitutionally necessary to preserve any remaining credibility in our institutions of government, which now hinges on whether or not justice will, once and for all, be visited upon the Clintons and their well-placed partisan accomplices, finally vindicating our system of law and justice after decades of yet-unpunished corruption that the Clintons and their ilk have insinuated into these institutions, bringing unparalleled and a now-accelerating degradation to American civic life itself.

Proactive Republican lawmakers have already demanded the resignation of Robert Mueller, as a start, and are calling for a thorough probe of his entire ad hoc operation, which is now coming apart at the seams with almost daily revelations of its rotten fraudulent core.

Mueller’s decades as an establishment federal careerist, which only ended with his ceding of the FBI’s top job to his good pal, criminal leaker and manipulator Big Jim Comey, offer more than enough grounds for Mueller’s disqualification for merely the appearances of impropriety and professional conflicts of interest they raise. They are of such incestuous nature as it concerns key figures of the conspiracy to remove the president that Mueller should never even have been considered for appointment.

That Mueller took the special counsel appointment without even blinking, despite his own close professional and personal connections to key figures implicated in the Department of Justice, National Security Agency and FBI corruption in service to ulterior partisan ends, via the Clinton crime family, was a major red flag, right from the beginning.

Reinforcing this red flag was the fact that Mueller’s entire (supposed) vetting for this sensitive, consequential special counsel position amounted a single-sentence approval letter signed by some faceless deputy attorney general barely a day after the appointment was promulgated.

Aside from Mueller’s blatant disregard for both attorney and public service ethics in accepting the special counsel appointment, some GOP lawmakers have also cited the former FBI director’s close involvement with the Obama administration’s secret Russian-U.S. uranium deal as more than enough reason for his immediate removal and the commencement of a real (untainted) investigation of the Obama-Clinton Russia-connected treason that Mueller has been instrumental in abetting and covering up.

So exactly what is the story with Uranium One?

Uranium One 101

The short version is that in 2010, when Mueller was FBI director, members of an interagency committee working under the Obama administration facilitated a highly-suspicious business deal that had grave public implication. The result of it was that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton effectively handed Russia and Vladimir Putin control over as much as 20 percent of the uranium production capacity of the United States.

As this deal was coming to fruition, after years of nefarious Clintonian machinations urging it along, Mueller’s FBI was investigating — and may have uncovered clear evidence of — Russian bribery and fraud to the detriment of U.S. uranium contractors, as part of a larger Russian (Putin) racketeering scheme to gain control of global uranium resources, namely by purchasing the power and influence being peddled by the Clintons to anyone who would meet their terms.

The FBI appears to have been investigating a Moscow-compromised uranium trucking company called Tenex As early as 2009. Tenex was allegedly engaged in racketeering through a pattern of bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Tenex was operating out of Bethesda, Maryland through a subsidiary named “Tenam USA.” The company was run by a Russian official named Vadim Mikerin. As the FBI was investigating Tenam’s alleged extortion and bribery scheme, Russia was seeking permission from the Obama administration and the Clinton State Department to acquire ownership in Uranium One. Despite evidence of Tenex’s and Mikerim’s alleged corruption as early as 2009, the Obama administration rubber-stamped a U.S. work visa twice for Mikerim, as late as 2014.

And what did our intrepid paragon of justice Robert Swan Mueller III do to thwart this alleged scheme and arrest its perpetrators? The answer is absolutely NOTHING. In fact, a confidentiality agreement prevented a key witness to the Clinton-Russia uranium treason from testifying. The Justice Department only just lifted on October 25, 2017, a full seven years after the fact, under pressure from congressional intelligence committee leadership.

Robert Mueller ensured that his own FBI investigators were effectively walled off from exposing the real players in our own government who were complicit in this epic influence-peddling scam founded on the Clintons’ ruthless greed and epic criminality.

Obama’s Justice Department and Mueller’s FBI knowingly kept Congress and the American people in the dark about Russia’s significant and quite possibly illegalmanipulations involving American uranium companies and the highest officials of American government, possibly among them U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. The result was that the Clintons’ criminal treason, in collusion with Russian nuclear criminals, went full steam ahead, unperturbed.

Mueller’s key role in the covering up of these Russia-Clinton uranium dealings constitutes more than enough justification for Robert Mueller’s immediate and unceremonious removal as an autonomous, secretive inquisitor limitlessly probing the newly-inaugurated president who defeated Mueller’s former Obama administration crony and cohort, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

There are probably a dozen other reasons why Mueller should be criminally charged but, for now, let’s just focus on this most heinous of schemes to which Mueller has been party: the transfer of our precious uranium resources to criminal Russian oligarchs to benefit the Clinton-Obama crime junta and sleazy hucksters from the ranks of the Democratic Party.

You might ask: How is it even possible that Russia (a supposed enemy) could acquire an in U.S. uranium capacity? The answer is that while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State under President Barack Obama, the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, was handed official U.S. government authorization to purchase a Canadian company named Uranium One which controlled uranium mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West..

Uranium One, as handed over to the Russians by the Obama-Clinton cabal, was effectively the creation of a Canadian entrepreneur named Frank Giustra. Mr. Giustra conveniently happened to be a major Clinton donor and a personal friend of Bill Clinton.

Photo: Guistra and Clinton Getty Images/Joaquin Sarmiento.

The Clinton-Giustra genesis of the Uranium One scam was detailed in a lengthy New York Times story in April 2015 titled “Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal.”

(Based on the old Grey Lady’s incessant animus for Donald Trump and its complicity in puffing up the Russia collusion delusion about the president, it would seem that Clintonian amnesia is the order of the day at the New York Times.)

In 2005, Clinton was flown on Giustra’s lavish private jet to Kazakhstan, a central Asian country once part of the former Soviet Union. By some estimates, Kazakhstan possesses around 12 percent of the world’s uranium resources and Giustra wanted to acquire ownership interest in several uranium mines.

Using his substantial network of contacts as a former U.S. president, Bill Clinton reportedly had arranged for Giustra and himself to dine with Kazakhstan’s despotic ruler, Nursultan Nazarbeyev. During the meal, Clinton handed the Kazakh president a propaganda coup when Clinton expressed support for Nazarbayev’s bid to head an international elections monitoring group.

On Sep. 6, 2005, Bill Clinton met with Kazakh strongman Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Two days later, Bill’s friend, Frank Giustra, received coveted Kazakh uranium mining rights—even though Giustra had no uranium mining track record. The industry was stunned. Within months, The Clinton Foundation received $152 million in “donations” from Frank Giustra. Two years later, Giustra sold those rights for $3.1 billion. Hillary and Bill did not disclose their Foundation winnings until forced to recently by Canadian authorities. Goldman Sachs assisted Giustra, and everyone else swirling around the Clinton's New World Order community organizing.

Photo: Reuters / Shamil Zhumatov SZH/DH.

Apparently it was of no consequence or concern to officialdom in Washington that this move by Clinton ran directly counter to American foreign policy and undermined much-deserved criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, Clinton’s wife, at the time a U.S. senator.

The new company Giustra formed to effectuate the Uranium One deal, UrAsia Energy Ltd., reportedly signed a preliminary deal giving it stakes in three uranium mines controlled by Kazatomprom, the government agency that runs Kazakhstan’s uranium mines and nuclear energy industry. In 2007 UrAsia merged with Uranium One in what was described as a $3.5 billion transaction, with the successor company retaining the name Uranium One.

Mukhtar Dzhakishev, president of Kazatomprom, subsequently alleged that then-Senator Hillary Clinton had pressured Kazakh officials to cede the uranium rights to Giustra.

Basically, Hillary served as the stick to her husband Bill’s proverbial carrot in making the deal happen.

According to The Washington Post, Dzhakishev “described the deal as ‘a financing mechanism of the Democratic Party’ and said a Clinton adviser named Tim Phillips championed it in meetings with him and other officials.”

From the same WaPo article:

At the time, Clinton denied taking any action to support Giustra’s purchase. Giustra also said Clinton played no role in the deal and rejected any link between the deal and his Clinton Foundation donations.

But in the leaked video of him speaking to the authorities, Dzhakishev said a senior Kazakh official told him to look into the deal after then-Sen. Hillary Clinton canceled a meeting with him. Dzhakishev said he was told that “investors who currently work in Kazakhstan and have ties to Clinton have problems and meetings will be resumed only after Kazakhstan resolves the problems.”

“I called them, and they came. I met them in Astana and then Clinton’s aide, Tim Phillips, began to scream that this deal involves Democrats and is financed by them, and that we were hampering the deal,” Dzhakishev said.

When all was said and done, UrAsia’s investors controlled the new Uranium One. The chairman of the new company was Canadian Ian Telfer.

Telfer reportedly donated $2.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Frank Giustra, who had shepherded Bill Clinton’s influence with the Kazakhstanis, held a personal stake in the deal estimated by some reports at about $45 million. Through a spokesperson, Giustra said he sold his stake in 2007. According to the New York Times, one year after the 2005 uranium deal was final Giustra donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation with a promise of $100 million more.

One adviser on the Uranium One-UrAsia merger was Paul Reynolds.

Reynolds reportedly donated $1 to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation.

A company called U.S. Global Investors Inc. held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares. A U.S. Global executive named Frank Holmes reportedly donated $250,000 to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

This is just the short list of Uranium One-connected donations that flowed back to the Clintons. Although the Clintons had an obligation to report these donations, they conveniently waited until 2008 to do so, and only when The New York Times was poised to expose and publish details about this obvious multi-million dollar pay-to-play scheme.

As is modus operandi with all of the Clintons’ sleazy machinations, any questions or suggestions posed about the connections between shady Clinton influence-peddling business deals and the inevitable cash windfalls realized by the Clintons were glibly pooh-poohed as either mere coincidence (please!) or lacking any “evidence” (as if we need signed receipts and written agreements to connect the obvious dots of the Clintons’ epic lucre).

With classic Clintonian prevarication, treating the public as either blind or stupid (or both), the Clintons steadfastly deny the obvious quid pro quo connections at the root of the Uranium One Kazakhstan acquisitions.

Of course, the Clinton crony-beneficiaries of the deal knew enough to follow suit with similar huffy denials, lest they meet with an unfortunate premature demise like so many others who have dared run afoul of the Clintons’ scamming and scheming, all the way back to their Arkansas backwater days.

Russo-Clinton Treason: Phase II

Once Uranium One was set up with the Kazakhstani uranium holdings firmly in the control of Clinton cronies, the stage was set for the next step in the Clintons’ treasonous plot: handing over Uranium One and its holdings to the Russians, or more accurately to Vladimir Putin.

Photo: Clinton and Putin AFP/Getty Images/Alexey Druzhinin.

The Clinton cabal’s uranium wheelings and dealings began immediately at the commencement in 2009 of the Obama administration, under the close direction of newly-installed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

In order for Russian nuclear entity Rosatom to purchase Uranium One the deal required approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS. The committee consists of top officials from nine different federal agencies. Not surprisingly, given the foreign subject matter intrinsic to the committee’s work, the key agency — the main driver out of all government players involved — is the U.S. Department of State, which was conveniently headed by Mrs. Bill Clinton in 2009.

To be clear, Hillary Clinton did not have the authority to push such a potentially-controversial deal through by herself. Such power ultimately resides with the president, in this case Barack Obama.

The CFIUS voted twice, first in 2010 and then in 2013, to approve Rosatom’s acquisition of Uranium One, thereby conceivably giving Vladimir Putin control of up to 20 percent of all U.S. uranium capacity.

It would be ridiculous to think that Obama, Hillary, Holder and Mueller would not have been well aware of the FBI’s investigation into the Russian racketeering and all of the bribes and kickbacks — in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act — that formed a backdrop to the Uranium One acquisition by Russia.

These sworn federal officials did not step in to expose and halt the tainted Uranium One deal. They may have cleared the way for it.

Robert Mueller appears to have known about the delivery of 10 grams of HEU (highly enriched uranium) to the Russians in September 2009.

The highly enriched uranium in question had been confiscated in 2006 by the U.S. Department of Energy in a “nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian accomplices.” A cable, one of several released by WikiLeaks, details Director Mueller’s mission to personally deliver the HEU to Russian law enforcement at the behest of Hillary Clinton.

Another interesting bit of “innocent timing” or convenient coincidence (take your pick): In June of 2010, the same month that Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One, Bill Clinton spoke in Moscow for the tidy sum of $500,000, the second-highest fee he had ever received for a speech.

Clinton’s half-million dollar bonanza for 90 minutes of “work” was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin. Renaissance Capital analysts talked up Uranium One’s stock, assigning it a “buy” rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was “the best play” in the uranium markets. Of course this, too, is just a “coincidence.”

If you think all of these connections and occurrences are too mind-boggling to accept as mere coincidence, hold onto your seat for this next one. Remember how the alleged Tenam/Rosatom racketeering activities were centered in Bethesda, Maryland at the Tenex U.S. offices? As rank-and-file FBI agents were assiduously investigating these Russian schemes to obtain U.S. uranium resources through corruption of public officials, Robert Mueller handed his longtime legal crony the Uranium One case to be buried and forgotten, clearing the way for approval of the Rosatom deal by the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton.

The crony’s name was Rod Rosenstein.

And the rest is history.

I leave you, good reader, to draw the obvious conclusions about what is really behind this cozy little bromance between Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein, the two lawyers who promulgated Mueller’s grotesque, unaccountable partisan hit squad that is clearly intent on taking out our president.

Let’s not forget what Donald Trump said to Hillary Clinton and the entire nation in a televised presidential debate on October 9, 2016:

“I’ll tell you what. I didn’t think I’d say this, but I’m going to say it, and I hate to say it. But if I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation, because there has never been so many lies, so much deception. There has never been anything like it, and we’re going to have a special prosecutor.”

After his election, Donald Trump chose to be magnanimous and forward-looking rather than follow through on his words and appoint that special prosecutor. Trump naively thought he could commence his presidency free from the tentacles of his seething, embittered dragon lady of an opponent.

Donald Trump genuinely did not want his presidency tangled up with the Clinton stain. He knew this would be impossible to avoid were he to see to the much-deserved prosecution of Hillary Clinton and her extensive syndicate of cohorts, cronies, flunkies and fellow travelers, including the likes of Mueller and Rosenstein, for their countless crimes and endless scandals.

Unfortunately for Donald Trump, they turned his debate promise around and gave him his “special prosecutor.” And now this “prosecutor” is ruthlessly and illegitimately driving towards nothing less than a coup d’état, that will only end with Donald Trump’s removal as the duly-elected President of the United States.

It will be ugly. It will be noisy. It will be dirty. It will be extremely difficult. The deep state’s spooky guardians will threaten the president with everything they can summon. But, by God, it is high time for President Trump to end this despicable sedition being perpetrated by repugnant, monomaniacal partisan degenerates and begin the work of draining the swamp…for real.

Roger Stone is a legendary Republican political consultant and a veteran of many national Republican presidential campaigns. He’s also the men’s fashion correspondent for The Daily Caller and editor of Stonezone.com. This article first appeared in The Daily Caller on Dec. 20, 2017.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author.

* * *