Stonewalling about Facebook’s origins is now a matter for mandatory public disclosure
A new NSA scandal in Germany (PDF) reveals cooperation with the NSA—despite feigned indignation about the earlier NSA snooping of Chancellor Angela Merkel's email. SAP (headquartered in Germany and one of their largest tech companies) helped deploy The Eclipse Foundation / IBM / NSA platform stolen from inventor Leader Technologies.
In that exposé, we included a photo of Judge MacNamara with an attorney toxic waste symbol. The illustration was satire to emphasize the destructive effects that the legal profession is having on our American Republic (see Fig. 1). In SAP's filing yesterday, they implied that Dr. Arunachalam was responsible for the AFI posts. She is not, but even if she was, the last time we checked, the First Amendment is still in the U.S. Consititution. SAP America conflated the description this way: "a picture of [the Judge] superimposed on a background of simulated targets with a skull and crossbones." Really? (Tellingly, SAP failed to mention the words "CORRUPTION CENTRAL," and thus took the description out of context which takes aim at the toxic conduct of corrupt officials and judges. These "Punks with a Pen" lawyers are masters of fabricated evidence.) We are pleased that SAP is reading our posts. Critiques of the conduct of public figures is an absolute necessity to maintain our Republic from the corrosive effects of corruption and abuse of power, as is exhibited in Dr. Arunachalam's patent case, in our opinion. We invite SAP to add comments if they believe something we have posted is incorrect.
Facebook began feeding user data on American citizens to the NSA just nine weeks after Eric H. Holder, Jr. became U.S. Attorney General. Was this the greatest public-private mercantile sell out of all time?
Are your children safe on the Facebook platform?
Is our Republic's political dialogue safe in the hands of these unaccountable predators and their secret censors of "community standards?"
ORIGINAL POST
(Apr. 29, 2015)—Mark Zuckerberg was a 19-year old Harvard sophomore in 2003-2004 when Facebook began.
The Social Network movie “narrative” led the public to believe that Zuckerberg was some sort of savant who could write computer code 20 or 30 times faster than a normal programmer. Not a single mainstream media investigator has ever questioned this story.
Given the pervasiveness of social networking in our culture—the media silence about Facebook’s origins betrays the secret loyalties of media editors and their owners who appear to have been insiders in this deception.
Will a Free Press return?
Hopefully, an independent Free Press will return before our Republic is destroyed by this acquiescence to crony capitalism.
Today, Facebook is protected by a phalanx of large law firms who have stonewalled every attempt to learn the truth about Zuckerberg and Facebook in 2003-2004. Prominent among these firms are Fenwick & West LLP, Gibson Dunn LLP, Cooley Godward LLP and Orrick Herrington LLP.
Incontestably, these law firms have outright lied to numerous federal judges in trade secrets, patent and breach of contract lawsuits filed against Zuckerberg and Facebook. They have also lied to the American public in the sale of Facebook stock to the public and their reliance on stolen intellectual property.
Normally, such lies would land these people in jail. But in Obama’s brand of justice, these people are excused and elevated to high office.
How do we know that The Social Network was a false narrative meant to fool the public into believing Zuckerberg was something he never was?
Zuckerberg's story changes with each telling
In a recent Zuckerberg v. Argentieri court filing, Zuckerberg wrote that he "conceived of Facebook" "around December 2003." However, in his 2006 ConnectU testimony he was clear that it was "one to two weeks" in January 2004.
In Ceglia v. Zuckerberg he first claimed the contract was a forgery. Then later, in U.S v. Ceglia, when it became clear that his original signature was on page two, he said the 2nd page was genuine, but the 1st page was a forgery. The government accepted his claim without independent verification and threw Ceglia in jail. The U.S. Attorney Preetinder Bharara was formerly employed by Gibson Dunn LLP, Facebook's attorney, and a fellow Obama Harvard crony.
However, in recent weeks the government disclosed an August 18, 2003 email where Zuckerberg and Ceglia discussed the second contract. Then just a few weeks ago, the U.S. Secret Service Forensic Labs confirmed that both pages of the contract are genuine. Despite this hard proof, Gibson Dunn LLP's mobster "Punks with a Pen" continue to shout the stale "forgery!" fiction in an obvious attempt to cover up the new facts that expose their false "narrative."
The judges and media that Gibson Dunn is shouting at are either gullible, or complicit.
A timeline of deception, theft and collusion
Magically, this information was found to be in the custody of Facebook's appeals attorney, Gibson Dunn LLP, the entire time. This revelation occured just two days after the Federal Circuit appeals court denied Leader's appeal on a trumped up Facebook side issue that the judges affirmed.
The judges in Leader v. Facebook, just like the judges in Ceglia v. Zuckerberg, hold substantial amounts of financial interests in Facebook at its underwriters. These holdings and their prior relationships with Facebook's attorneys dictated their recusal according to the Code of Conduct.
These judges have been playing paddy cakes games trying to hide behind ambiguous guidelines that appear to let them hold stock in litigants behind mutual funds. But, the self-serving guidelines are convoluted and fail to address the overarching instruction to avoid even the appearance of impropriety—which their mutual fund games do not. Instead, they hammered down against the U.S. Constitution and sacred American property rights in order to protect their cronies. See Hijack of the Cyber World Timeline and Database.
During 2003, while Leader Technologies was busy debugging its social networking invention, Zuckerberg set about to stall at least three other campus facebook initiatives by Paul Ceglia (Facebook), the Winkelevoss Twins (ConnectU) and Aaron Greenspan (HOUSEsystem).
The various deceptions were necessary so his former PayPal handlers (James W. Breyer, Reid Hoffman, Peter Thiel), in collusion with IBM attorney David J. Kappos and IBM’s "The Eclipse Consortium," could wait for Leader's 750,000 lines of source code to be debugged and fed to them by Leader's patent counsel, IBM's chief outside counsel. For comparison, a good programmer can write and test perhaps 300-400 lines of debugged (clean up all drafting errors) code a day.
Leader's debugging was completed on Oct. 28, 2003. Magically, Zuckerberg hacked the house sites at Harvard that same night ("Let the hacking begin.").
Several months later, in the coincidence of coincidences, IBM-Eclipse sponsored its first "EclipseCON" on Feb. 2-5, 2004. Magically, Facebook launched on Feb. 4, 2004, during the convention.
Rolling forward, Barack Obama was elected on Nov. 4, 2008.
On Nov. 18, 2008, Leader Technologies sued Facebook for patent infringement.
On Nov. 28, 2008, Harvard's Larry Summers was appointed to lead the bank bailout and thereafter funneled $33 million to Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan—all Facebook underwriters.
On Dec. 12, 2008, the FISA Court quietly change thde oversight rules which effectively gave the incoming Attorney General almost dictatorial powers to allow the NSA to spy on American citizens on the flimsiest of probable cause.
On Mar. 27, 2009, Eric H. Holder, Jr. became U.S. Attorney General. Leader Technologies' patent attorney, James P. Chandler, appears to have had murky control over Holder's nomination and the relationship between the Justice Department and the NSA.
Nine weeks after that, on Jun. 06, 2009, Facebook began feeding American user data to the NSA based on a dubious FISA opinion concocted just months earlier to give incoming Eric H. Holder, Jr. almost dictatorial powers to snoop on American citizens. See previous two posts.
Also in June 2009, Facebook told Leader Technologies' attorneys that Zuckerberg's 2003-2004 information requested in discovery was all lost.
On Aug. 13, 2009, David J. Kappos, IBM's intellectual property counsel was appointed by Obama as director of the Patent Office. Both Kappos and Eric Holder were protégés of, James P. Chandler, Leader Technologies' patent attorney. Chandler was chief outside counsel to IBM and close adviser to the National Security Agency (NSA)
On Nov. 29, 2001, during Kappos' tenure at IBM, he and Chandler cajoled IBM to invest $40 million to start The Eclipse Foundation. The publicly available Eclipse minutes from Dec. 8, 2004 state they were “unable to locate” the original contributor of the code they used to start Eclipse. The minutes also declared that they must “re-implement” its founding source code. “Re-implementation” is lawyer sophistry for steal.
Snark Alert (Sorry, we could not resist commenting on the ridiculousness of the "unable to locate" and "re-implementation" lawyer sophistry for theft in the preceding paragraph.)
Notice to the Facebook Cartel lawyers: we found the contributor you were unable to locate! Leader Technologies—true American innovators from Columbus, Ohio. Turns out, your law professor buddy, Professor James P. Chandler, was Leader's patent counsel at the time you stole Leader invention starting in late 2001! (See Eclipse formation announcement, Nov. 29, 2001; See first Eclipse board meeting minutes.) James P. Chandler—the esteemed professor emeritus of intellectual property law from George Washington University and author of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996—must've had a brain freeze not to remember his client's name. Isn't it a crazy coincidence that Chandler also happened to have two protégés who just happened to gain high office in the Obama White House in IBM/Eclipse's David J. Kappos (Patent Office director) and Eric H. Holder, Jr. (Attorney General)? Isn't it also just crazy coincidence that Chandler cut a backroom deal with IBM/Eclipse to construct a special backdoor for the NSA into the Eclipse platform Leader platform that you gave away (without Leader's permission) to every developer on the planet in 2004. As a result, the NSA can snoop on every American, including our children, at their convenience, in total secrecy. Yee Haw, it was an "open source" code free for all, wasn't it? You certainly do know how to "lose" incriminating evidence when it is convenient. No wonder Facebook looked so much like Leader's invention. It was!
the dog ate it (for national security, of course)
You high paid lawyer malcontents sure are clumsy with your evidence. You lost Lois Lerner's emails. You deleted Hillary's email. Shucks, you just cannot find DoJ emails. You have stonewalled review of Zuckerberg's 28 hard drives and Harvard emails in Leader v. Facebook, Celgia v. Zuckerberg, U.S. v. Ceglia. Yada, yada, yada.
The first whistle blower might be able to cut a deal to stay out of jail. You younger lawyers don't want to ruin your lives and families for these misguided people. Don't be fooled any longer, their conduct is greed, powermongering and criminality dressed up in the verbiage of "national security."
On Jul. 18, 2012, Facebook's experts Rose and McGowan revealed that 28 Zuckerberg hard drives and Harvard emails were not lost and were in the custody of Gibson Dunn LLP the whole time, proving that their claims to Leader Technologies were a lie.
Facebook: child predator and voyeur? The public & 1+ billion users deserve to know the truth. public safety is threatened
Over one billion Facebook users, Facebook's shareholders and the American public deserve to know the truth about Zuckerberg and Facebook’s origins.
The fact that Facebook’s lawyers have stonewalled (with extensive judicial cooperation) every lawful request to review Zuckerberg’s 2003-2004 hard drives and Harvard emails is telling.
What are they hiding? If their arguments are genuine, then they have nothing to worry about. If on the other hand, the investigation proves that Ceglia’s contract is genuine, and it proves that Facebook relies on Leader Technologies’ invention, then Facebook is led by thieves and liars who have made a pact with the devil in their cooperation with the NSA.
If the latter is true, then these are not the sorts of people to be managing the online conversations of our children.
Is our childrens' digital playground overseen by liars, thieves & Money Launderers? (Yes)
Would you drop off your children to play in playground full of thieves, liars and money launderers? That appears to be exactly what is happening on Facebook.
This issue has become one of public safety and security, and not just one of constitutional contract and patent rights.
No more stonewalling from Facebook's cadre of unscrupulous lawyers, Bankers and judges
It’s time for an independent commission to get to the truth about Zuckerberg and Facebook’s origins—before Facebook’s lawyer, Gibson Dunn LLP and McManus Faulkner LLP, cause these 28 hard drives and Harvard emails in their custody to disappear, magically.
* * *
Notice: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself.
Comment
Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to amer4innov@gmail.com and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.
