tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post8327813332442321655..comments2024-03-26T19:51:43.322-07:00Comments on Americans for Innovation: LEADER V. FACEBOOK WALL OF SHAMEK. Crainehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-76998051568430590102013-02-14T13:34:18.510-08:002013-02-14T13:34:18.510-08:00Comment by: Judicial Corruption
FACEBOOK INSIDERS...Comment by: Judicial Corruption<br /><br />FACEBOOK INSIDERS ARE DUMPING STOCK at a feverish pace. Check out the latest Form 4 required disclosures at the SEC:<br /><br />http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1326801.htm<br /><br />What's the hurry boys and girls?<br /><br /><br /><br />K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-42172530442051521592013-02-14T06:54:39.572-08:002013-02-14T06:54:39.572-08:00Comment by: Kissablechas
Hey Kissablekaren,
Face...Comment by: Kissablechas<br /><br />Hey Kissablekaren,<br /><br />Facebook has the federal courts on their payroll. The better way is to boycott their advertisers and hit them where it hurts: their pocketbooks. Without advertisers giving them money, their revenue will dry up. 8-OK. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-61870827682718301722013-02-11T10:57:46.918-08:002013-02-11T10:57:46.918-08:00LETS ALL SUE FACEBOOK FOR VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTIT...LETS ALL SUE FACEBOOK FOR VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH!kissablekarenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05294869106606140568noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-8271972389875725632013-02-11T07:57:48.810-08:002013-02-11T07:57:48.810-08:00Dear AFI Readers:
AFI has received multiple repor...Dear AFI Readers:<br /><br />AFI has received multiple reports this weekend of Facebook censorship of posts in Facebook private chats and even friend-ing of people who are attempting to publicize and follow the growing Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption scandal.<br /><br />Facebook censorship has stopped PRIVATE conversations that were critical of Facebook, in several reports. In another, Facebook blocked friend requests between Facebook users and their U.S. Congressman, Senators and judicial reform advocacy groups like Lawless America.<br /><br />It has been suggested that those experiencing First Amendment Free Speech violations should report them to federal and state (1) Departments of Commerce, (2) Inspectors General, and (3) your members of Congress.<br /><br />U.S. Dept. of Commerce:<br />http://www.commerce.gov/<br /><br />U.S. Inspector General:<br />http://www.justice.gov/oig/<br />Go to your State's Department of Commerce and Inspectors General Websites to get the contact information in your State.<br /><br />U.S. Congress:<br />http://www.contactingthecongress.org/K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-78054877851805496232013-02-09T07:35:47.592-08:002013-02-09T07:35:47.592-08:00Comment by: snoop dog
All roads lead back to Lawr...Comment by: snoop dog<br /><br />All roads lead back to Lawrence Summers, Sheryl Sandberg and Yuri Milner when Summers was Chief Economist for the World Bank in the early 1990's. <br /><br />Curiously, <br /><br />Summers was President of Harvard when Zuckerberg got his start in 2003-2004. Explains how the 19-yr. old received more press coverage than all other world figures except Clinton and Bush in THE HARVARD CRIMSON. They're layin' down the spin, dude.<br /><br />Summers proposed the failed economic transition policy in the USSR that gave birth to the current oligarch robber barons in Russia.<br /><br />Summers is teamed with one of the Russian oligarchs through his protege Yuri Milner, second largest investor in Facebook.<br /><br />Summers is teamed with Facebook through his protege Sheryl Sandberg, Chief Operating Officer at Facebook and Zuckerberg's puppetmaster.<br /><br />Summers friends at Goldman Sachs put an executive in London before the 2008 bailout with a big basket to catch theirs and Morgan Stanley's $32 billion windfall from the bailout. That executive now works for Yuri Milner in Dubai.<br /><br />Summers arranged to have himself appointed as "special adviser" to Marc Andreessen just weeks before the scandalous $1 billion purchase of Instagram by Facebook right before the IPO. Milner's and Sandberg's payoff? Their "thank you" for the years of tutelage in how to organize global corruption?<br /><br />Milner was associated in the early 2000's with Bank Menatep that was caught laundering over $10 billion in mob money and diverting over $4 billion in IMF funds (probably World Bank funds too, according to some reports).<br /><br />The list of koinky-dinks is much longer, these are only highlightsK. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-10342582556147077412013-02-09T07:15:04.216-08:002013-02-09T07:15:04.216-08:00Comment by: Well Duhhhh
Leader v. Facebook is exp...Comment by: Well Duhhhh<br /><br />Leader v. Facebook is exposing:<br /><br />1. Abolition of property - denying property rights to the holder of a valid U.S. Patent - rights guaranteed in Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution.<br /><br />4. Centralization of credit - Facebook Credits (oh wait, they claim the aren't doing this anymore, yeh right).<br /><br />5. Centralization of communications - Facebook and their scandal-ridden theft of Leader Technologies inventions; ripping off user privacy and shipping it to China, Russia and India.<br /><br />... three out of your six Light Reader.<br /><br />The other three are being pushed actively by the current administration, it appears to me. Of course, there is nothing inherently wrong with free education, but as the Soviet Union learned, it works for a while as a means of political indoctrination, until it falls apart from within due to its moral bankruptcy.<br /><br />Looks like those die-hard communists are back in the saddle, now in business suits, allied with the Thieving Gangs in Silicon Valley - who sold their immortal souls to the highest borscht-breath bidders.<br />K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-20965653032769385862013-02-09T07:03:36.161-08:002013-02-09T07:03:36.161-08:00Comment by: Light Reader
I was just reading the C...Comment by: Light Reader<br /><br />I was just reading the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO today written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Englels in 1848. Ran across these Communist objectives:<br /><br />1. Abolition of property<br />2. Heavy progressive graduated income tax<br />...<br />4. Centralization of credit... by means of a national bank<br />5. Centralization of the means of communication<br />...<br />6. Free education for all children<br /><br />Wow, do these planks sound contemporary? Read for yourself a summary in Wikipedia at:<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Communist_Manifesto<br /><br />K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-69154600034274473872013-02-08T15:19:37.097-08:002013-02-08T15:19:37.097-08:00Comment by: Sleuth Dog
We need people who know th...Comment by: Sleuth Dog<br /><br />We need people who know these individuals and their families to tell us which people have experienced "SUDDEN UNEXPLAINED WEALTH" or "SUDDEN UNEXPLAINED OPPORTUNITY."<br /><br />Such symptoms ALWAYS tag along, side by side, with corruption.K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-28881496562670645292013-02-08T06:30:55.866-08:002013-02-08T06:30:55.866-08:00UPDATE ON USPTO COVER-UP IN LEADER V. FACEBOOK:
W...UPDATE ON USPTO COVER-UP IN LEADER V. FACEBOOK:<br /><br />We updated the USPTO Cover-up Documents with an update that includes a new request for a new inquiry as a result of the covered-up contents. The Scribd link is automatically updated, here is the updated Google link:<br /><br /><br />https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2SfG2nEsMfqUFVNZDJxQkpyZHM/edit?usp=sharingK. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-7262141581813911862013-02-08T06:19:16.480-08:002013-02-08T06:19:16.480-08:00Comment by: Judicial Corruption
Just so everyone ...Comment by: Judicial Corruption<br /><br />Just so everyone is clear, USPTO matters are overseen by federal judges too, they're called "Administrative Patent Judges."<br /><br />In the Leader v. Facebook 3rd examination, they are:<br /><br />Judge Allen R. MacDonald<br />Judge Stephen C. Siu<br />Judge Meredith C. Petravick<br /><br />These judges are also bound by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.<br /><br />They should be asked to disclose whether they hold stock in Facebook, or whether any of their family members own stock. If they do, even a small amount, they are bound by the Code of Conduct to disqualify themselves.<br /><br />K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-31951803120495666472013-02-08T06:02:40.287-08:002013-02-08T06:02:40.287-08:00Comment by: Judicial Corruption
This kind of cove...Comment by: Judicial Corruption<br /><br />This kind of cover-up is precisely what occurs when a government agency believes itself to be no longer accountable to the citizens who fund their very existence. Congratulations to whoever dug this up. Now we're getting somewhere. Everyone on this blog should use this material and request their own Congressional Inquiries from their Congresspersons and Freedom of Information Act requests. Suggest you ask to see all communications among every person identified on those USPTO messages and anyone on the list of Facebook cronies.<br /><br />Each of you should ask them each to disclose whether they hold Facebook stock either directly or through an investment vehicle like a mutual fund, IRA, Keogh, etc. Be sure to personalize your request with unique requests so that the USPTO cannot send a form letter response, like they did the last time.<br /><br />Make noise folks. It works. Bad guys don't like the light of day.K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-24323855075848587702013-02-07T16:04:42.105-08:002013-02-07T16:04:42.105-08:00COVER-UP AT THE US PATENT OFFICE: AFI has just rec...COVER-UP AT THE US PATENT OFFICE: AFI has just received a copy of a recent Freedom of Information response just issued by the Patent Office in the growing judicial corruption scandal. As you can see for yourself, the USPTO literally covered up all disclosure of information regarding their order of a 3rd reexamination of Leader Technologies' U.S. Patent No. 7,139,761.<br /><br />As a refresher, Facebook lost these arguments at trial. Then, they have lost them again, twice, during two earlier re-examinations. Not even the Patent Examiner Deandra M. Hughes approves of this 3rd reexam order.<br /><br />The scent of foul play is strong. This document can be obtained in two places:<br /><br />GOOGLE-DRIVE:<br />https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2SfG2nEsMfqSkJNR1RycUtWZlk/edit?usp=sharing<br /><br />SCRIBD:<br />http://www.scribd.com/doc/124428891/Patent-Office-Cover-up-in-Leader-v-Facebook-Feb-7-2013<br /><br />We'll write a post about this after we've had time to consider the implications. Clearly, the scandal hole gets deeper. As we have suspected all along it would. One cannot be this bad, for this long, without eventually getting caught.K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-2938497563754833222013-02-07T07:24:54.723-08:002013-02-07T07:24:54.723-08:00Comment by: Conflicts Checker
THEODORE W. ULLYOT,...Comment by: Conflicts Checker<br /><br />THEODORE W. ULLYOT, Facebook's General Legal Counsel, who oversaw the Leader v. Facebook judicial scandal, sorry, patent infringement case, appears to be dumping his stock:<br /><br />Here's the SEC Insider Trading Report for Theodore Warren Ullyot: <br /><br />http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1382582.htm<br /><br />Let's see, if this judicial misconduct was motivated by Facebook's law firms, directed by Mr. Ullyot, do you think the fingers might point to him? However, we all know he is only a puppet for the board of directors led by James W. Breyer, Yuri Milner (DST Moscow) and Sheryl Sandberg... the last two being bailout director Larry Summers' understudies. Hmmmmmmmm.K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-63388081051654970392013-02-07T05:47:05.627-08:002013-02-07T05:47:05.627-08:00Comment by: Bryn T
Me too! I was talking with Law...Comment by: Bryn T<br /><br />Me too! I was talking with Lawless America on Facebook too, then all of a sudden a screen popped up that I have NEVER seen before and I have been using it since high school telling me it was going to kick me off if I did not stop SPAMMING! I have never spammed in my life. THIS SOUNDS LIKE BIG BROTHER. My parents tell me this is the kind of censorship you see in a dictatorship. Very creepy. Who are these people running Facebook, a bunch of friggin NAZIS???K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-20694061433643989012013-02-05T11:13:08.751-08:002013-02-05T11:13:08.751-08:00Comment by: Platypus
This reminds me of the censo...Comment by: Platypus<br /><br />This reminds me of the censors in China? How is it different? K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-18978154750021572882013-02-05T09:35:42.165-08:002013-02-05T09:35:42.165-08:00So, we were on Facebook this Saturday past (2/2/13...So, we were on Facebook this Saturday past (2/2/13), following Lawless America (great blog, by the way). During a conversation with other followers of the blog I posted a brief synopsis of Leader Technologies’ fight. I left for a bit and came back to check on any responses, and my comment was gone. I inquired as to its disappearance, but they had neither knowledge nor control over any editing. <br /><br />“SO, WHY DID IT DISAPPEAR?!!”<br /><br />They had an open phone line, that night, for callers to call in and give their stories of any legal problems or corruption that they had either encountered, or to complain about lawyers, judges, and the like. Anyhow, I started to repost my thoughts about our case. I wanted to tell them about Facebook and how they corrupted the judicial process (apparently Facebook doesn't like truths being spread about them and their true origins). I was promptly greeted with a spam warning, threatening to block me or shut my Facebook account down if I didn’t acknowledge or agree to stop. Fearing a snooping Trojan, I quickly logged out without acknowledging anything.<br /><br />As I am sure many on this site are aware, Facebook is obviously trolling their users’ pages and other sites for info or key words. These are nefarious, dirty people and are always looking over their shoulders! <br /><br />Stay the course everyone!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03060210908195201324noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-38374774822855873182013-02-02T06:34:23.607-08:002013-02-02T06:34:23.607-08:00Comment by: Law Blogger
Judge Evan J. Wallach spe...Comment by: Law Blogger<br /><br />Judge Evan J. Wallach speaks with forked tongue. He denied Leader Technologies their rights and their property, and abused the Code of Conduct for United States Judges in Leader v. Facebook. HOWEVER, in 2005 he self-righteously called for accountability when he criticized the U.S. military and Bush Administration regarding the mistreatment of prisoners in Abu Graib. He wrote:<br /><br />“Our values are non-negotiable for members of our profession. They are what a professional military force represents to the world. Those who do battle with monsters must take care that they do not thereby become a monster. Always remember that when you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes back into you . . . The abyss is gazing back at us.” Pages 537, 538, 621.<br /><br />“In the civilian context, where government officials operate under the color of law have entered into an agreement to violate federal law, all persons who joined in that agreement are liable for all reasonably foreseeable violations of law which were done in its furtherance.” Pages 618-619.<br /><br />OK Judge Wallach, your LEADER V. FACEBOOK MONSTERS are staring at you. Are you going to do the right thing, or are you just another moral hypocrite who likes to hear himself pontificate?<br /><br />I suspect the later. Prove me wrong.<br /><br />CITATION: <br /><br />http://www.pegc.us/archive/Journals/Wallach_CWR_nexus.pdf<br /><br />Wallach, E. J. “The Logical Nexus Between the Decision to Deny Application of the Third Geneva Convention to the Taliban and al Qaeda and the Mistreatment of Prisoners in Abu Ghraib.” CASE WESTERN RESERVE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2004, VOL 36; NUMB 2/3, pages 541-638.<br />K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-71000628448086973532013-02-01T13:48:49.153-08:002013-02-01T13:48:49.153-08:00Comment by: Must look stupid
The Federal Circuit ...Comment by: Must look stupid<br /><br />The Federal Circuit BARFED AND LAUGHED ALL OVER these guidelines on judicial disqualification from the FEDERAL JUDICIAL CENTER: <br /><br />"even the smallest financial interest (e.g., ownership <br />of a single share of stock) requires disqualification. Under § 455(c), it is a judge’s duty to keep abreast of all of his or her financial interests."<br /><br />http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/judicialdq.pdf/$file/judicialdq.pdf<br /><br />Do ya think Judges Moore and Lourie had at least a "single" share in Facebook between their five or ten funds. Do you think it is possible that NONE of the Federal Circuit judges purchased stock in Facebook during the IPO? Did ANY of them disclose and disqualify? Nope. This is outrageous conduct from people we are supposed to trust.K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-15498639356686455222013-02-01T08:20:49.785-08:002013-02-01T08:20:49.785-08:00Comment by: Well Duhhhh
You guys should be runnin...Comment by: Well Duhhhh<br /><br />You guys should be running Congress. You're doing a better job at figuring out what's wrong than they have been able to!!!!! You must actually solve problems and produce results for a living!K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-4195644378536721502013-02-01T08:06:46.888-08:002013-02-01T08:06:46.888-08:00Comments by: Lucy
Right on Peanuts! When you cons...Comments by: Lucy<br /><br />Right on Peanuts! When you consider that the Federal Circuit handles ALL U.S. Patent Office appeals, you see a corrupt and scandalously unaccountable TRIFECTA among: (1) corrupt attorneys, (2) corrupt patent office directors and examiners, and (3) a corrupt patent appeals court. Its a formula for friggin disaster. We are seeing that disaster in living color in the Leader v. Facebook scandal. Speaking of corrupt trifectas, what's the status of Facebook's USPTO-Director-ordered 3rd reexam BTW?<br /><br />Anybody know how Fenwick & West's Christopher P. King aka Christopher-Charles King is holding up in their shell game at the patent office having not disclosed Leader's patents as prior art in the Facebook patent family? LOLK. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-50742575841780925052013-02-01T07:31:19.492-08:002013-02-01T07:31:19.492-08:00Comment by: Peanuts
It just struck me while the F...Comment by: Peanuts<br /><br />It just struck me while the Federal Circuit is sick. It was the creation in 1982 by, of and for attorneys. It's purpose seemed like a good idea at the time, namely to populate it with judges who know patents. However, what it lacked was any semblance of accountability other than to itself. That was a prescription for corruption. The founders implemented a system of checks and balances. The attorneys who framed the Federal Circuit's charter built a self-serving entity that is now rife with corruption, lack of accountability and no checks and balances??? Worse, many of the new appointees don't even know patents, like Judge Evan J. Wallach on the Leader v. Facebook panel.K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-72842097096035027872013-01-31T06:49:00.053-08:002013-01-31T06:49:00.053-08:00Comment by: AFJ Reader
According to ALLIANCE FOR ...Comment by: AFJ Reader<br /><br />According to ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE information about Judge Evan J. Wallach:<br /><br />"From 1987-1988 he worked as General Counsel and Public Policy Advisor to Senator Harry Reid."[1] <br /><br />Harry Reid seems to have no problems with duplicity and lining one's family's pockets, as was reported by AFI in a "Postscript AFI Editorial."[2] <br /><br />Harry Reid's son-in-law Steven G Barringer lobbied for a Henderson, Nev. development that Reid grandfathered into the 2009 Omnibus Act. Harry Reid's son Josh is now the city attorney for Henderson.<br /><br />Did Judge Wallach learn his craft all too well from the Senate Majority leader? Is that why he is so sure the Senate Judiciary Committee won't investigate him?<br /><br />[1] http://www.afj.org/judicial-selection/nominees/evan-j-wallach.html?templateName=template-30435193<br /><br />[2] http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/p/dc-bar-refuses-to-investigate-attorney.htmlK. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-29833840318462679442013-01-30T21:25:47.911-08:002013-01-30T21:25:47.911-08:00Comment by: Law Blogger
These libel lawsuits by j...Comment by: Law Blogger<br /><br />These libel lawsuits by judges should be allowed to run their course. It's a two-edged sword for a crooked judge. He or she may be counting on an early settlement to maintain his or her ruse. However, if the allegations are true, then discovery should unearth the truth. I would love to see the phone records and meeting logs of these judges' contacts with Facebook attorneys, not to mention their bank accounts and Homeland Security's reports on their foreign holdings and those of their family members. We can already see that Judges Moore and Lourie (and probably others, not to mention their families) had Facebook stock during the Leader case. That alone is enough to impeach IMHO, especially since they were asked to disclose their holdings and other conflicts. It is inconceivable that no one in the Federal Circuit, or their families, did not invest in the Facebook IPO. Proving just one who invested will invalidated the En Banc denial and the entire Federal Circuit opinion in this case. K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-26196782071392624462013-01-30T20:56:10.837-08:002013-01-30T20:56:10.837-08:00Comment by: Judicial Corruption
Attorneys pretend...Comment by: Judicial Corruption<br /><br />Attorneys pretend to tell the truth, and judges pretend to police them. Then they sue for libel to maintain the charade if exposed. This system of endemic corruption must be fixed. It is totally, completely and utterly out of hand.K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9186912903670110532.post-25435119274928983042013-01-30T15:42:17.551-08:002013-01-30T15:42:17.551-08:00Comment by: Platypus
I like this shame idea. I sa...Comment by: Platypus<br /><br />I like this shame idea. I saw a CNN interview with some comedian who says he thinks that shame may be the new way to "encourage" people to do the right thing. People who just keep doing the wrong things and have no moral compass. To bad we have to use this tactic with judges. They are supposed to be smart and above this. These judges jumped in the Facebook minivan on the way to Woodstock. I need to go shower. Yuck.K. Crainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00907125616515499417noreply@blogger.com