Chief Justice holds 49 investments in Obamacare vendors and 193 in Eclipse Foundation members feeding the NSA spy-state machine
(Jun. 29, 2015)—More schizophrenic Supreme Court rulings beg the question: “Who is the judicial pied piper in Washington?” When did lies and Gruber-deception replace veracity as the legal standard?
Washington Cartel Agenda: Usurp the Power of the People
Viewed through the lens of the “Washington Cartel,” these decisions are consistent with an agenda to rewrite the Constitution by scrambling historical precedent.
While most judicial policy making is concealed behind black robes, one very public aspect of a judge’s conduct is his or her annual financial disclosure. The purpose of the disclosure is to enable the public to assess judicial impartiality.
However, even there judges have, without public hearings or debate, slipped in self-serving interpretations of the law that excuse their fraudulent conduct.
Judges have sanctioned lying
On Oct. 11, 1996, lawyers for the Cartel slipped in Subsection (b) into the False Statement Accountability Act of 1996. Subsection (b) excuses all lying by judges, lawyers and parties. Few public officials appear to know about this law. See previous post.
Judges have sanctioned bribery
On Mar. 14, 2001, the Judicial Conference issued an “advisory” discussing a “safe harbor concept.” This sloppy "concept" has been elevated to the status of an unwritten rule without public debate. It exempts judges from disclosing their holdings in deep-pocket litigants by masking them behind mutual funds. Judges are totally ignoring the pages of exceptions to this concept and are giving themselves carte blanche permission to abuse the Code of Conduct Canon 2 exhortation to flee even the appearance of impropriety. See previous post.
Certain mutual fund managers popular with certain judges and members of the Administration are mere tools of these litigants, most notably Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, Fidelity, T. Rowe Price and Vanguard. So in effect, investments in certain mutual funds by judges and public officials have become sophisticated bribes.
Harvard Law inbreeding
Four of the six justices who sustained Obamacare, for a second time, are from Harvard Law, the other two are from nearby Ivy sisters, Princeton and Yale. In short, Obamacare was sustained by judicial inbreeding. Any sophistry that these few schools produce the only worthy legal minds in the country is pretentious and egotistical.
Justice Roberts is mired in inexcusable financial conflicts of interest
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.’s 2012 financial disclosure shows a substantial appearance of impropriety.
Justice Roberts holds 49 investments in Obamacare vendors and at least 193 investments in members of IBM’s NSA spy-machine named The Eclipse Foundation.
The Washington Cartel
How is it possible that Justice Roberts has holdings of up to $6.2 million on a federal judge's salary? Genius investor? Uncannily lucky investor? Or, who really pulls his strings? The answer is evident from his financial disclosure: Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, Vanguard, Microsoft, JPMorgan, Facebook, Google, Apple, HP, Dell, IBM, Time Warner, NBC Universal and their lackeys at the NSA—The "Washington Cartel" (all companies in which he holds more than 10 stocks).
Justice Roberts has failed to oversee the FISA Court and NSA abuses of privacy and property
A little known fact is that Justice Roberts unilaterally appoints judges to the secret FISA Court that is a rubber stamp for NSA requests to spy on Americans. The court has denied only 12 of 34,000 NSA requests. See previous post.
According to Edward Snowden’s leaks, the NSA is currently monitoring 1.2 million American citizens. This sounds more like former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover’s enemies list than a terrorist list. See previous post.
Justice Roberts failed to disclose these same financial holdings and conflicts in Leader v. Facebook
Leader Technologies’ petition in Leader v. Facebook came before Justice Roberts in 2012. There too, he was silent about his substantial financial holdings in Facebook, Facebook’s underwriters, The Eclipse Foundation members and the Washington Cartel who appear to be controlling his every step. See previous post.
Justice Roberts should step down
Given an ounce of decency, Justice Roberts should step down voluntarily, as should any other justice who voted on Obamacare without disclosing his or her financial holdings in Obamacare vendors.
The trust of the American people hangs in the balance.
Remember: Fraudulent decisions by judges are reversible, including these Obamacare rulings.
* * *
Notice: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself.
Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to firstname.lastname@example.org and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.