AFI Custom Search

SEARCH by topic, keyword or phrase. Type in Custom Search box
Use this Custom Search toole.g. "IBM Eclipse Foundation" or "racketeering"

Monday, October 28, 2013

ANGELA MERKEL SHOULD LOOK PAST OBAMA TO THE FACEBOOK CLUB

Facebook’s "Dark Profiles" acquiring all the world’s personal data, voraciously

Contributing Writers | OPINION | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION  | Updated Jun. 27, 2016 | PDF
Katherine Losse, The Boy Kings - A journey into the heart of the social network
Fig. 1—Katherine Losse, Mark Zuckerberg's former ghost writer confirmed "Dark Profiles" — "Facebook's secret profiles, master passwords... and a 'hot or not' app: Insider's book reveals Zuckerberg's 'twisted' quest for total domination." The Daily Mail (UK); Photo: theboykings.com.

USPTO Officer (former employee of Facebook attorney White & Case LLP) admits secret "alias" email accounts

None of these secret emails have been produced in Leader v. Facebook  FOIA requests

(Nov. 3, 2013 Update)—AFI investigators uncovered yesterday a 2012 Patent Office directive, issued by Kathryn W. Siehndel (CLICK HERE), FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) Officer, instructing employees not use the intellectual property of third parties (like Leader Technologies’) without permission.

Update Nov. 4, 2013: Obamacare claims scandalously that Leader's technology is "open source."
Only Facebook's attorneys would make this claim. This is more strong evidence that Facebook's attorneys are colluding with the Administration.

11/5/13 Update: Obama's Chief Technology Officer, Aneesh Chopra, held large amounts of stock in Facebook, Microsoft, IBM and other Facebook Cartel members. He even took a $200-300 million investment from Microsoft before Obama hired him. (See Comments)

Facebook was judged to be in "literal infringement" of Leader's patent on 11 of 11 claims. This is the highest form of patent infringement. See: "How HealthCare.gov uses third-party websites and applications" (captured from the Obamacare website at 09:42 AM EST, Nov. 04, 2013).[10]

Just saying it doesn't make it so. Buying off federal judges to get your way is a crime.

By the time of the Siehndel memorandum, Patent Office Director, David J. Kappos, had already posted on his USPTO Facebook Page 300 times (CLICK HERE)—without asking Leader Technologies for permission to use their intellectual property. Kappos' impropriety occurred while his office was in the middle of processing Facebook's request for reexamination of Leader's patent.

Did the White House order the U.S. Patent Office to steal Leader's technology to support re-election, OBamacare & banker Buds like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan?

Equally troubling, Siehndel admits that USPTO personnel have secret “alias” accounts (p. 15) (CLICK HERE), yet she has not produced a single copy of these messages in any Leader v. Facebook FOIA inquiry. While the directive looks innocent enough on the surface (its for security and privacy), observers of the Facebook Club now know that this is their blanket excuse for all abuses of security and privacy.

Siehndel is the Patent Office FOIA Officer who has failed to disclose her conflict of interest ties to Facebook's attorneys in Leader v. Facebook, and who is stonewalling current FOIA inquiries (see below).

Technologists know that "alias" email message handling is a playground for the unscrupulous to mask misconduct in a blizzard of technospeak acronyms like SMTP, SRS, NDN, RCPT and SPF. All that laypeople really need to know here is that while the destination of an "alias" email could be one's inbox, it could just as easily be forwarded to a secret Gmail, Yahoo or Facebook account.

USPTO Rules of the Road, V. 3, Dep. 10, 2012

This practice opened the USPTO system up to mischief and concealment of collusion. If caught, Siehndel and her Facebook Club will cite this policy as "full disclosure" of their practices. Count on it. These lawyers have fabricated an excuse for every unethical deed they do. Just observe their tap dancing on President Obama's "you can keep your plan" promise. Their Leader v. Facebook conduct is more of the same confiscation of public trust and property.

Confiscation of personal property; abuse of trust

Indeed, the millions of cancelled healthcare plans are just as much a citizen's personal property as Leader Technologies' U.S. Patent No. 7,139,761 for social networking. In fact, the two are combined now that the Obamacare website is relying on Facebook links—Leader Technologies' invention and property.

In like manner, each American who has just had his or her healthcare cancelled spent time, energy and resources (their intellectual property) to acquire their plan—a plan their President promised dozens if not hundreds of times they could keep.


FIRST UPDATE

Complaint against Patent Office Filed with Inspector General

Executive Branch confiscated Leader Technologies' invention to publish USPTO director newsletter—while pretending impartiality & making false insurance promises

(Nov. 1, 2013 Update)—Department of Commerce Inspector General, Todd J. Zinser, received a new complaint today against the Obama Administration's abuse of private property.

The complaint (CLICK HERE)[08] alleges that Obama's political appointee, Patent Office Director, David J. Kappos, confiscated the social networking patent of Columbus, Ohio-based innovator, Leader Technologies, Inc., for his personal newsletter to 10,000+ Patent Office employees. Kappos set up his Facebook page during the Leader v. Facebook proceedings. This conduct violates common sense and the Executive Branch's "Standards of Ethical Conduct" on fairness and impartiality. Inventors must be able to rely upon an impartial Patent Office. "That trust was resoundingly abused in our case," said a Leader spokesperson.


Fig. 2—"President Obama Promising That You Can Keep Your Health-Care Plan, Again and Again [23 times]" New York Magazine, Oct. 29, 2013.[09]

Pres. Obama made this promise: Oct-2008 (1x), Jun-2009 (3x), Jul-2009 (4x), Aug-2009 (6x), Jan-2010 (1x), Mar-2010 (6x), Apr-2010 (1x), Sep-2010 (1x).

Timing-wise, Kappos posted to his Facebook Page 302 times between May 2010 and Nov. 2012 (www.facebook.com/uspto.gov). By May 2010 President Obama had already made 22 of 23 assurances to Americans that "you can keep your current insurance," according to New York Magazine.[09] Likewise, Barack Obama carried 114 links on his Facebook Page to his political organization, Organizing for Action, between 2007 and today (www.facebook.com/barackobama).

confiscation of property and rights by a government is illegal

In short, this Administration relied on confiscated social networking property invented by Columbus-based innovator, Leader Technologies, to promote its political agenda. That agenda included confiscation of the rights of Americans to keep their health insurers.


ORIGINAL POST

(Oct. 28, 2013)—In 2012, Mark Zuckerberg’s former speech writer, Katherine Losse, revealed in her book The Boy Kings, that since 2006 Facebook has had a feature called "Dark Profiles," which creates secret accounts for people who have never signed up.[01]

This means that if your picture is ever tagged with your name, a secret, "dark" data gathering account about you is created—one that you did not authorize and will never see. Then, every time your name is mentioned anywhere in the world, or your picture appears anywhere, that data will be immediately associated with your Dark Profile. Creepy, but true. A Congressional Briefing was published after Losse's book was published.

It may be legal, but is it moral? – When "legal" is toxic

The Facebook Club lawyers are practicing a KGB/Moscow-developed tactic called "lawfare." The Soviets developed the technique to undermine Western democracies during the Cold War. Now that research has been repurposed. These unscrupulous lawyers have assured the Facebook executives that all this is perfectly "legal" since all 1 billion users on Facebook gave up their privacy rights when they signed on. Legal? Maybe. Moral? Surely not. This is a good example of why lawyers cannot be given power to run governments. Their fungible ethics will eventually drag a society over the cliff's edge.

What you don’t know can hurt you

Are you tempted to think, so what, how can my Facebook data hurt me? Think again. President Obama currently has over 47 million "likes" on Facebook.The improper way that he obtained this disproportionately high number aside, elections can be manipulated with these Dark Profiles, since there are only 1 billion Facebook users, but 7.1 billion people in the world.[06]  

What others write about you, and who tries to friend you, is a gold mine for demographers who extrapolate intimate details about your life, including your voting preferences. These secret profiles can predict how you’ll vote, and what your hot buttons are, with surprising accuracy.

If you are a fence sitter, that's when you’ll get a personal visit from an Obama for America local organizer. That person will already know your issues, and will have an information kit customized just for you. If there are enough of you in a single voting bloc, say left-handed Californians, don’t be surprised if an Executive Order favoring left-handed Californians suddenly appears. President Obama only beat Mitt Romney by 5 million votes. So, these "Dark Profile" fence sitters are enough to swing an election.

Since that data was not equally available to the opposition, use of this data about you amounts to election manipulation. The fact that so many foreigners are associated with Facebook amounts to foreign influence on U.S. elections, which is illegal. This undue influence hurts every American. Ditto for the sovereign elections in Germany, France or any other country.

Facebook Club data spying and gathering is run amok
Photo: The Irish Times

The Facebook Club is creating Big Brother on steroids

Now, add your healthcare (Obamacare), financial (Wall Street), telephone and online data (NSA) to your Dark Profile, and you have the ultimate Big Brother file on every person on the planet. What do you think Facebook is storing in its new Swedish data center—outside the reach of US law?[2] Ask yourself why not a single investigator from the mainstream media has doggedly investigated Facebook executives to get to the bottom of their theft of intellectual properties from Leader Technologies and others, their repeated breaches of security and their now ubiquitous intrusions on people's privacy expectations. Is it because the mainstream media is drunk on the Facebook ad revenue Kool-Aid?

The Facebook Club is consolidating power, as we speak

Is it any wonder why the Facebook Club is currently pulling out all the stops to achieve their data gathering objectives, before their agenda is exposed? We believe this hidden agenda explains why the pundits who are not part of the Facebook Club are currently shaking their heads and asking what is going on. In fact, Bob Woodward in yesterday's Face the Nation interview with Bob Shieffer expressed his alarm at the out-of-control "secret government" being exposed by the NSA snooping.[03]


Fig. 3—Bob Woodward, Associate Editor, The Washington Post, discussing his concerns about a "secret government" in America on Face the Nation, Oct. 27, 2013.[03]. Video: CBS

Bob Woodward’s "Secret Government" = The Facebook Club

We believe that the privacy laws in Europe are proving to be a stumbling block to the Facebook Club's agenda. Enter the NSA. If, for example, the Facebook Club can learn what Angela Merkel's cyber policy plans are, then they can stay several steps ahead of her with the goal of fully incorporating the German and French economies into their global financial and electioneering plans.

judicial bribery
Graphic: Yosamite

Leader v. Facebook  revealed that American justice checks and balances are broken

The revelations of the Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption scandal have exposed intimate, cross-fertilized relationships among a gaggle of Washington, New York and Silicon Valley law firms, Wall Street, the Justice Branch, the Executive Branch, telecommunications and mainstream media.[5] The checks and balances firewall that traditionally separated these groups has crumbled. The schemes appear to have hatched at Harvard in the late 1980's. Who better than a gaggle of narcissistic Harvard Law graduates to break the U.S. Constitution using their inside knowledge? John Adams is surely praying for their souls right now.

We recommend to the Europeans that they not focus on Obama per se, but rather on Obama's handlers – the Facebook Club. Obama is only a pawn on the chessboard.

Europe: Focus on The Facebook Club for motive & hidden agenda

German Chancellor Angela Merkel
Fig. 4—German Chancellor Angela Merkel's personal cell phone was hacked by the U.S National Security Administration (NSA). Is a U.S. "secret government" (Bob Woodward, Oct. 27, 2013) leading the unprecedented snooping worldwide? We believe the answer is yes; it's Obama's Facebook Club. Photo: AP

We suggest that Europeans focus on Lawrence "Larry" Summers, James W. Breyer, John P. Breyer, Thomas G. Hungar, Gordon K. Davidson, Theodore B. Olson, George Soros, Alisher Usmanov, Sheryl Sandberg, Yuri Milner, Accel Partners LLP, Reid Hoffman, Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, Donald K. Stern, Thomas J. Kim, Preetinder "Preet" Bharara, David J. Kappos, Robert F. Bauer, Anita B. Dunn, Eric H. Holder, Toni Townes-Whitley, World Bank, IMF, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and the gaggle of law firms, and their in-tow federal judges and bar associations; law firms named Gibson Dunn, Cooley-Godward-McBee Strategic, White & Case, Blank & Rome, Fenwick & West, Orrick Herrington, Weil Gotshal, Latham & Watkins, Sullivan & Cromwell and Perkins Coie.

Wood Borer Beetle is akin to the debilitating effect the Facebook Club is having on American democracy
Fig. 5—The Facebook Club Effect on American democracy. Wood Borer Beetles: Virginia Tech

The Facebook Club is almost exclusively lawyers. Lawyers are skilled at manipulating the levers of power, but are woefully inadequate at administrating power. We believe lawyers have an inherent conflict of interest in holding office and running bureaucracies while they hold an active law license. They are effectively playing on both sides of the ball. In any other profession such conflicts would not be permitted. Attorneys have bored their way into the woodwork of American democracy like borer beetles.

Stark Contrast: if Mark Zuckerberg is to be believed. Zuckerberg testified under oath that he programmed the first Facebook site in Jan. 2004 by himself, in "one to two weeks," while studying for sophomore finals, chasing girls and drinking heavily.[07] By contrast, the U.S. government had three years and $678 million to build the Obamacare site. Obama should have just hired the boy wonder and given him a six-pack. Who is lying about the sources of their website engineering?

On July 29, 2013 Facebook was found guilty on 11 of 11 counts of stealing Leader Technologies' social networking invention. but the federal judges, incl. the Chief Justice, protected their personal pre-IPO investments in Facebook, instead of judging rightly.

Why hasn't an independent press exposed this fraud?

The Obamacare design document is between 10,000 and 33,000 pages depending upon who's counting

If you doubt that the current leadership crisis in Washington DC is attorney-fabricated, just look at Obamacare. It is currently between 10,000 and 33,000 pages.[04] That's a lot of legal fees (good for lawyers) and a non-implementable instruction manual (bad for U.S. citizens).

Engineers doubt that the Obamacare site can be fixed in a few weeks, as we are currently promised, because the wrong people are driving the bus.

"Tech surge" is a silly engineering notion

America needs engineers and problem solvers, not more lawyers concocting silly notions like a "tech surge." In programming, more is generally not better. In fact, more is generally bad when one is building the first version of a program. Developers know that perhaps 20 qualified engineers is optimal to build an initial operating environment. Too many cooks spoil the broth in software research and development. Therefore, while the notion of a "tech surge" may mollify the masses, it is a silly engineering notion.

The Facebook Club voracious data-gathering vortexFig. 6—The Facebook Club has created Dark Profiles to collect data on every person on the planet, then feed those profiles with "inadvertent" data breaches from Verizon, IRS, NSA, Microsoft, Yahoo, AOL, AT&T, IBM, Google, etc. etc. etc. – all "mistakes that won't happen again." (Once they've happened once,  the damage is done.) Graphic: http://www.helago-cz.cz/ke-stazeni/

If the R&D were run properly by engineers and designers instead of lawyers, no "tech surge" would be needed now. It is evident that this supposed surge is nothing more than a smokescreen to get more Facebook Club programmers involved building Facebook Club data siphons and backdoors. Obama's former chief of staff Rahm Emanuel said: "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." What better excuse than a "tech surge" to inject your people into an otherwise closed programmer pool?

Obamacare website fiasco: more misdirection by the Facebook Club

Such mismanagement had to be intentional. Even first year project management students would have done a better job. One must work to screw up the website implementation this badly. NASDAQ also had similar "gliches" when the Facebook IPO began trading. Curiously, all the Facebook insiders cashed out under that smokescreen to the tune of $6+ billion. The hidden agenda of the Facebook Club must be exposed and stopped before the personal information of everyone on the planet is consolidated in their unelected, private hands.

Don’t sacrifice your property, privacy and security on the Facebook Club altar. "Free" is never free.

* * *

Footnotes:

[01] Facebook Dark Profiles: Ramkumar Iyer. (Jun. 29, 2012). Facebook developed ‘Stalker, Dark Profiles’ says ex-employee in new book. First Post.

[02] Facebook Swedish Data Center: Ashlee Vance. (Oct. 04, 2013). Inside the Arctic Circle, Where Your Facebook Data Lives. BusinessWeek.

[03] Bob Woodward "secret government:" Bob Woodward. (Oct. 27, 2013). The Secret NSA/C.I.A. Government. YouTube. Face The Nation. MP4.

[04] 10,000 to 33,000 page Obamacare design specification: Glenn Kessler. (May 15, 2013). How many pages of regulations for 'Obamacare'? The Washington Post.

[05] Leader v. Facebook  courts ignored law; held Facebook investments. Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Leader Technologies, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., No. 12-617 (U.S. Nov. 16, 2012) HTML.

[06] How did 47 million Obama FB "likes" appear? "U.S. Politics Must Quit Facebook – Facebook agenda is a clear and present danger to American democracy." Americans For Innovation, Sep. 17, 2013 http://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2013/09/us-politics-must-quit-facebook.html

[07] Mark Zuckerberg's "I built Facebook in 'one to two' weeks" testimony. Mark Zuckerberg Deposition, Apr. 25, 2006, ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg et al, 04-cv-11923-DPW (D.Mass. 2004) <http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/zuckerberg/2006-04-25-Mark-Zuckerberg-Deposition-Apr-25-2006-ConnectU-LLC-v-Zuckerberg-et-al-1-04-cv-11923-DPW-D-Mass-2004.pdf>.

[08] Inspector General Complaint. Dept. of Commerce COMPLAINT to the Inspector General against the U.S. Patent Office, incl. former Director David J. Kappos; Judges Stephen C. Siu, Allen r. MacDonald, Meredith C. Petravick; and FOIA Officer Kathryn W. Siehndel, Oct. 31, 2013 <http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/foia/2013-12-09-USPTO-CORRUPTION-COMPLAINT-TO-COMMERCE-INSPECTOR-GENERAL-Supplement-Dec-9-2013.pdf>.

[09] Pres. Obama's Healthcare Promises. ''Video: President Obama Promising That You Can Keep Your Health-Care Plan, Again and Again'' by Dan Amira. New York Magazine, Oct. 29, 2013 <http://videos.nymag.com/video/If-You-Like-Your-Plan-Supercut>.

[10] Obamacare makes false, Facebook Club "open source" intellectual property claims. ''How HealthCare.gov uses third-party websites and applications.'' HealthCare.gov Privacy Policy, Nov. 4, 2013, 09:42 AM'' <http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/obamacare/HealthCare.GOV-Privacy-Policy-Nov-4-2013.pdf#page=5>.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

JAMIE DIMON'S WEB OF ASSOCIATIONS ALL LEAD TO THE FACEBOOK CLUB

Obamacare confusion, IRS, AP, JPMorgan, Leader v. Facebook—All part of a grand scheme?


Contributing Writers | OPINION | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION  | Oct. 22, 2013
Barack Obama and Jamie Dimon have a cozy relationship
Fig. 1—Cozy is the only way to describe the longstanding relationship between Barack Obama and JP MorganChase's CEO, Jamie Dimon. Obama's Wall Street handlers appear to be Jamie Dimon, Lawrence "Larry" Summers, and Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs—all of whom Obama and Summers bailed out in 2008 to the tune of $30+ billion, not counting the Facebook IPO misrepresentation in collaboration with the SEC, and the "green" energy stimulus to cronies. Photo: Reuters.

(October 22, 2013)—The Obama Facebook Club orchestration of crisis on top of crisis continues. Layered on top of the Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption and the fraudulent use of Leader Technologies’ social networking invention, we now add Obama's/Eric Holder’s dubious settlement with Jamie Dimon, and the Obamacare website crisis.

Like Obama's confiscation of Leader Technologies' invention, Obama is now allowing JP MorganChase to turn over $13 billion to his government—property of the bank's shareholders, not Jamie Dimon's or Obama's. In short, this government is further shredding constitutional private property rights, just like the Federal Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court had no right to confiscate Leader's patent property rights by judicial fiat.

"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste," Rahm Emanuel, Mr. Obama's new chief of staff, told a Wall Street Journal conference.[01]

Barack Obama and the Facebook Club further muddy the waters with each new scandal
Fig. 2—Each new Obama scandal further muddies the waters. Photo: Lake Clinic.org.

Why are these new crises good for the Obama Facebook Club Agenda? They muddy the waters further.

  1. Bailout Scam. They obscure Jamie Dimon’s intertwined associations with Goldman Sachs’ and Morgan Stanley’s $30 billion from U.S. taxpayers in the 2008 bailout—funds with significant portions sent to dubious foreign partner banks, including Russian banks associated with Russian oligarchs and Goldman Sachs-Moscow;
  2. Green Energy Stimulus Scam. They obscure the ongoing investigation into the funneling of "green" stimulus funds to Obama donors, including the families of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority leader Harry Reid—funds managed by JPMorganChase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Facebook law firm Cooley Godward LLP;
  3. Judicial Corruption. They take Congress’s attention away from the massive judicial corruption at the Federal Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court exposed by Leader v. Facebook.
  4. Property Confiscation. They delay redress of the confiscation of Leader Technologies’ patent properties by the Obama administration (47 million Obama Facebook “likes,” Patent Office’s 16,000 “likes,” etc.), not to mention Facebook’s illegal use of Leader’s property to drive the Facebook engine;
  5. Voter Manipulation. The delay enables Obama and Facebook to continue manipulating the LOFO voter (low-information voter) data and fund raising from Facebook that will be critical for the 2014 and 2016 elections;
  6. Corrupt Law Firms. They obscure the culpability of Washington DC and Silicon Valley law firms directly associated with these layers of corruption, including Gibson Dunn, Fenwick & West, Cooley Godward, Weil Gotshal, White & Case, Latham & Watkins, Blank Rome, Perkins Coii, Orrick Herrington, Federal Circuit Bar Assoc., DC Bar Assoc.
  7. Masters of Misdirection:
    Beware the hacker offering "help" to the Obamacare website; Facebook's NASDAQ website was broken too. All the Facebook Club insiders cashed out during that confusion.
    Securities Fraud. The delay obscures the massive Facebook IPO securities fraud perpetrated by JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and the SEC;
  8. Money Laundering. The delay obscures investigation of the Facebook Club ties among the IPO, 2008 bail out and energy stimulus.
  9. Obamacare Backdoors. The delay enables Obamacare to solicit website “help” from Facebook crony hackers to build privacy-violating backdoors “to enhance user experience.”

Real leadership creates peace, not confusion

Merriam Webster defines confusion as “a state or situation in which many things are happening in a way that is not controlled or orderly.” Contrast the confusion and injustice emanating from Washington DC with the words of St. Paul in I Corinthians 14:33: “God is not the author of confusion, but of peace.” Confusion is equated with madness and blindness in Deuteronomy 28: 20: “The Lord will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind.” From time immemorial, confusion has been associated with lack of humanity, injustice and unrighteousness. "You shall know them by their fruit." A bad tree cannot produce good fruit.

Is it just us, or does the Obama Administration appear to be orchestrating these crises? Are they stealing properties and information as tools to radically alter American democracy? It is readily apparent that they rely heavily on the global communication system invented by Leader Technologies. It appears their strategy also includes control of healthcare and electioneering data, as well as financial and banking data. It appears that The People must stop this since Washington is already caught in this web of confusion.

Is American confusion actually a well-conceived Facebook Club plan?
Fig. 3—Is the confusion actually a well-conceived plan to unravel American Democracy in the name of "hope and change." Graphic: After Class Lounge.

Engineering 101: Define the confusion problem correctly

The first step in solving a problem is to define it correctly. It behooves our uncompromised American leadership to consider that these layers of crises emanate from a single strategy for political, financial, legal and technological control by the Facebook Club.

Pulling on the many threads of Jamie Dimon’s fabric of associations seems to lead to the same spool of Facebook Club thread. Congress should stop chasing each of these crises separately, and instead, dig into the unifying motive.

* * *

Footnote:


[01] “In Crisis, Opportunity for Obama.” The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 21, 2008 <http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB122721278056345271>; See also <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs6TgitlNIA>.